Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Associations between satellite-derived estimates of PM2.5 species concentrations for organic carbon, elemental carbon, nitrate, and sulfate with birth weight and preterm birth in California during 2005–2014

Abstract

Background

Characterizing the spatial distribution of PM2.5 species concentrations is challenging due to the geographic sparsity of the stationary monitoring network. Recent advances have enabled valid estimation of PM2.5 species concentrations using satellite remote sensing data for use in epidemiologic studies.

Objective

In this study, we used satellite-based estimates of ambient PM2.5 species concentrations to estimate associations with birth weight and preterm birth in California.

Methods

Daily 24 h averaged ground-level PM2.5 species concentrations of organic carbon, elemental carbon, nitrate, and sulfate were estimated during 2005–2014 in California at 1 km resolution. Birth records were linked to ambient pollutant exposures based on maternal residential zip code. Linear regression and Cox regression were conducted to estimate the effect of 1 µg/m3 increases in PM2.5 species concentrations on birth weight and preterm birth.

Results

Analyses included 4.7 million live singleton births having a median 28 days with exposure measurements per pregnancy. In single pollutant models, the observed changes in mean birth weight (per 1 µg/m3 increase in speciated PM2.5 concentrations) were: organic carbon −3.12 g (CI: −4.71, −1.52), elemental carbon −14.20 g (CI: −18.76, −9.63), nitrate −5.51 g (CI: −6.79, −4.23), and sulfate 9.26 g (CI: 7.03, 11.49). Results from multipollutant models were less precise due to high correlation between pollutants. Associations with preterm birth were null, save for a negative association between sulfate and preterm birth (Hazard Ratio per 1 µg/m3 increase: 0.973 CI: 0.958, 0.987).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: California zip code tabulation areas displaying the percentage of days with ambient speciated particulate matter concentration estimates.
Fig. 2: Scatterplots and Pearson coefficient matrix showing correlations between pregnancy-averaged ambient pollutant concentrations in a sample of 1000 births.
Fig. 3: Distribution of mean ambient pollutant concentrations during pregnancy.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. Crosswalk tables to match non-geographically bound zip codes to a ZCTA, such as the Uniform Data System Mapper (https://udsmapper.org/zip-code-to-zcta-crosswalk/), are available; however, we could not guarantee the mother would physically reside in the matched ZCTA, so we elected to not match the non-geographically bound zip codes to a ZCTA.

References

  1. Harris G, Thompson WD, Fitzgerald E, Wartenberg D. The association of PM2.5 with full term low birth weight at different spatial scales. Environ Res. 2014;134:427–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, Perin J, Rugan I, Lawn J, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2015;385:430–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun X, Luo X, Zhao C, Zhang B, Tao J, Yang Z, et al. The associations between birth weight and exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its chemical constituents during pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:38–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun X, Luo X, Zhao C, Chung RW, Lim C, Zhang B. The association between fine particulate matter exposure during pregnancy and preterm birth: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated science assessment for particulate matter. Research Triangle Park; 2019.

  6. Chen L, Lippmann M. Effects of metals within ambient air particulate matter (PM) on human health. Inhal Toxicol. 2009;21:1–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly F, Fussell J. Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos Environ. 2012;60:504–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rohr A, Wyzga R. Attributing health effects to individual particulate matter constituents. Atmos Environ. 2012;62:130–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schlesinger R. The health impact of common inorganic components of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in ambient air: a critical review. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:811–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stanek L, Sacks J, Dutton S, Dubois JJ. Attributing health effects to apportioned components and sources of particulate matter: an evaluation of collective results. Atmos Environ. 2011;45:5655–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Committee on Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council, and National Academy of Sciences. Research priorities for airborne particulate matter: IV. Continuing research progress. Washington, D.C: National Press Academies; 2004.

  12. Bell M, Dominici F, Ebisu K, Zeger S, Samet J. Spatial and temporal variation in PM(2.5) chemical composition in the United States for health effects studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bove H, Bongaerts E, Slenders E, Bijnenes E, Saenen N, Gyselaers W, et al. Ambient black carbon particles reach the fetal side of human placenta. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Institute of Medicine. Preterm birth: causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2007.

  15. Strickland M, Ying L, Darrow L, Warren J, Mulholland J, Chang H. Associations between ambient air pollutant concentrations and birth weight a quantile regression analysis. Epidemiology 2019;30:624–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Belle J, Chang HH, Wang Y, Hu X, Lyapustin A, Liu Y. The potential impact of satellite-retrieved cloud parameters on ground-level PM2.5 mass and composition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14:1244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin X, Fiore A, Curci G, Lyapustin A, Civerolo K, Ku M, et al. Assessing uncertainties of a geophysical approach to estimate surface fine particulate matter distributions from satellite-observed aerosol optical depth. Atmos Chem Phys. 2019;19:295–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Manuck T, Rice M, Bailit J, Grobman W, Reddy U, Wapner R, et al. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: A contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:103

  19. Raju T, Higgins R, Stark A, Leveno K. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute Of Child Health And Human Development. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1207–14.

  20. Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Kleeman M, Bartell S, Cockburn M, et al. A statewide nested case-control study of preterm birth and air pollution by source and composition: California, 2001–2008. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:1479–86.

  21. Geng G, Meng X, He K, Liu Y. Random forest models for PM2.5 speciation concentrations using MISR fractional AODs. Environ Res Lett. 2020;15:034056.

  22. National Vital Statistics System. Guide to completing the facility worksheets for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; 2022.

  23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. Methods for Estimating the Due Date. Committee Opinion Number 700; 2017.

  24. Strand, Barnett AG, Tong S. Methodological challenges when estimating the effects of season and seasonal exposures on birth outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Prediction and prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: ACOG practice bulletin, number 234. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138:e65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson PK, Gill RD. Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study. Ann Stat. 1982;10:1100–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fong K, Di Q, Kloog I, Laden F, Coull B, Koutrakis P, et al. Relative toxicities of major particulate matter constituents on birthweight in Massachusetts. Environ Epidemiol. 2019;3:e047.

  28. Darrow L, Klein M, Strickland M, Mulholland J, Tolbert P. Ambient air pollution and birth weight in full-term infants in Atlanta, 1994–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:731–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebisu K, Bell M. Airborne PM2.5 chemical components and low birth weight in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1746–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ha S, Zhu Y, Liu D, Sherman S, Mendola P. Ambient temperature and air quality in relation to small for gestational age and term low birthweight. Environ Res. 2017;155:394–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Takeda Y, Michikawa T, Morokuma S, Yamazaki S, Makahara K, Yoshino A, et al. Trimester-specific association of maternal exposure to fine particulate matter and its components with birth and placental weight in Japan. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63:771–8.

  32. Darrow L, Klein M, Flanders W, Waller L, Correa A, Marcus M, et al. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth: a time-series analysis. Epidemiology 2009;20:689–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Brauer M, Lencar C, Tamburic L, Koehoorn M, Demers P, Karr C. A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:680–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Laurent O, Hu J, Li L, Cockburn M, Escobedo L, Kleeman M, et al. Sources and contents of air pollution affecting term low birth weight in Los Angeles County, California, 2001–2008. Environ Res. 2014;134:488–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bell M, Belanger K, Ebisu K, Gent J, Lee H, Koutrakis P, et al. Prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter and birth weight: variations by particulate constituents and sources. Epidemiology 2010;21:884–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fleish A, Rifas-Shiman S, Koutrakis P, Schwartz J, Kloog I, Melly S, et al. Prenatal exposure to traffic pollution: associations with reduced fetal growth and rapid infant weight gain. Epidemiology 2015;26:43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. U.S. EPA. Supplement to the 2019 Integrated Science Assessment for Particulate Matter (Final Report, 2022). Washington D.C.: Federal Information & News Dispatch, LLC; 2022.

  38. World Health Organization. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: WHO Press; 2021.

Download references

Funding

Sources of financial support: NIH grants R01ES028346 and R01ES029528, and support from the MAIA science team at JPL, California Institute of Technology (Subcontract #1588347).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PR analyzed the data and was the primary manuscript author. GG and YL provided access to satellite data and modeled the ground-level pollution estimates. LD and MS were both major contributors to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Strickland.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This research was performed in accordance with the approval given by the following ethics committees: California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects IRB# 2019-027 and the University of Nevada, Reno IRB# 1164285-13.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reuther, P.S., Geng, G., Liu, Y. et al. Associations between satellite-derived estimates of PM2.5 species concentrations for organic carbon, elemental carbon, nitrate, and sulfate with birth weight and preterm birth in California during 2005–2014. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00673-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-024-00673-y

Keywords

Search

Quick links