Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The acceptability and feasibility of emailed parent questionnaires for medical and developmental surveillance after NICU discharge

Abstract

Objectives

The following are the objectives of this study: (1) Assess the feasibility and acceptability of emailing parent-reported measures of infant health and development after NICU discharge. (2) Examine whether post-discharge questionnaire data helps identify infants most likely to benefit from specialized follow-up care.

Study design

Parents of 51 infants <32 weeks’ gestation received email questionnaires at 44 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) and 6 months corrected age (CA). Adverse infant outcomes were assessed in-person at 6 months: (1) Bayley-III cognitive or motor score <85; (2) weight, length, or head circumference <10th percentile; (3) new referral for medical or developmental services.

Results

Questionnaire response was 48 (94%) at 44 weeks PMA and 46 (90%) at 6 months CA. 36 (70%) infants were assessed at 6 months; 72% had at least 1 adverse outcome. Poorer transition home, feeding problems, and special health care needs at 44 weeks PMA predicted adverse outcomes. Feeding problems, maternal depression, and lower infant health-related quality of life at 6 months CA correlated with adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

Emailed questionnaires after NICU discharge were feasible to implement and acceptable to families. Repeated post-discharge assessments may help identify infants at heightened health and developmental risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mathews J. National vital statistics-births: final data 2006. In: Statistics NCfH, editor. Hyattsville” NCHS; 2006.

  2. McCormick MC, Litt JS, Smith VC, Zupancic JA, Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;32:367–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milligan DW. Outcomes of children born very preterm inEurope. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(4):F234–40.

  4. Synnes AR, Anson S, Arkesteijn A, Butt A, Grunau RE, Rogers M, et al. School entry age outcomes for infants with birth weight </=800 grams. J Pediatr. 2010;157(6):989-94e1.

  5. Follow-up Care. of High-risk infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1377–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuppala VS, Tabangin M, Haberman B, Steichen J, Yolton K, Current state of high-risk infant follow-up care in the United States: results of a national survey of academic follow-up programs. J Perinatol. 2011;32:293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF, Das A, Hintz SR, Stoll BJ, et al. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1801–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lapcharoensap W, Gage SC, Kan P, Profit J, Shaw GM, Gould JB, et al. Hospital variation and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a population-based cohort. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:e143676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knapp C. e-Health in pediatric palliative care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010;27:66–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa C, Menesatti P, Brighetti MA, Travaglini A, Rimatori V, Di Rienzo Businco A, et al. Pilot study on the short-term prediction of symptoms in children with hay fever monitored with e-Health technology. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;46:216–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benyakorn S, Riley SJ, Calub CA, Schweitzer JB. Current state and model for development of technology-based care for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Telemed J E Health. 2016 22:761–8.

  12. Maleka BK, Van Der Linde J, Glascoe FP, Swanepoel W. Developmental screening-evaluation of an m-health version of the parents evaluation developmental status tools. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:1013–8.

  13. Lakshmanan A, Santo E, McCormick MC, Belfort M, Parental preference and ability to participate in web-based developmental screening and surveillance: preliminary evidence for preterm infants after NICU discharge. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53:1278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman K, Goldmann DA, Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology: a physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 1993;91:617–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman EA, Smith JD, Frank JC, Eilertsen TB, Thiare JN, Kramer AM, Development and testing of a measure designed to assess the quality of care transitions. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e02

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. DeMauro SB, Patel PR, Medoff-Cooper B, Posencheg M, Abbasi S, Postdischarge feeding patterns in early- and late-preterm infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50:957–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bramlett MD, Blumberg SJ, Ormson AE, George JM, Williams KL, Frasier AM, et al. Design and operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2009-2010. Vital Health Stat 1. 2014;57:1–271.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaper AM, Rooney BL, Kay NR, Silva PD, Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to identify postpartum depression in a clinical setting. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:620–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beck CT, The effects of postpartum depression on child development: a meta-analysis. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1998;12:12–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayer ML, Skinner AC, Slifkin RT, National Survey of Children With Special Health Care N. Unmet need for routine and specialty care: data from the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs. Pediatrics. 2004;113:e109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fung EB, Samson-Fang L, Stallings VA, Conaway M, Liptak G, Henderson RC, et al. Feeding dysfunction is associated with poor growth and health status in children with cerebral palsy. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:361–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Latal-Hajnal B, von Siebenthal K, Kovari H, Bucher HU, Largo RH, Postnatal growth in VLBW infants: significant association with neurodevelopmental outcome. J Pediatr. 2003;143:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith VC, Hwang SS, Dukhovny D, Young S, Pursley DM, Neonatal intensive care unit discharge preparation, family readiness and infant outcomes: connecting the dots. J Perinatol. 2013;33:415–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Belfort MB, Santo E, McCormick MC, Using parent questionnaires to assess neurodevelopment in former preterm infants: a validation study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sheldrick RC, Henson BS, Neger EN, Merchant S, Murphy JM, Perrin EC, The baby pediatric symptom checklist: development and initial validation of a new social/emotional screening instrument for very young children. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13:72–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Landgraf JM, Vogel I, Oostenbrink R, van Baar ME, Raat H, Parent-reported health outcomes in infants/toddlers: measurement properties and clinical validity of the ITQOL-SF47. Qual life Res: Int J Qual life Asp Treat, care Rehabil. 2013;22:635–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG, Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Group WMGRS. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development.. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Early Childhood; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW, Victorian Infant Collaborative G. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:352–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khoo K, Bolt P, Babl FE, Jury S, Goldman RD, Health information seeking by parents in the Internet age. J Paediatr Child Health. 2008;44:419–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Epstein JN, Langberg JM, Lichtenstein PK, Kolb R, Altaye M, Simon JO, Use of an Internet portal to improve community-based pediatric ADHD care: a cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1201–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lane TS, Armin J, Gordon JS, Online recruitment methods for web-based and mobile health studies: a review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuppala VS, Tabangin M, Haberman B, Steichen J, Yolton K, Current state of high-risk infant follow-up care in the United States: results of a national survey of academic follow-up programs. J Perinatol: Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2012;32:293–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, Perritt R, Poole WK, Tyson JE, et al. Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004;113:781–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the Center for Patient Safety and Quality Research and by the Division of Newborn Medicine, both at Boston Children’s Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S. Litt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Litt, J.S., Agni, M., Jacobi-Polishook, T. et al. The acceptability and feasibility of emailed parent questionnaires for medical and developmental surveillance after NICU discharge. J Perinatol 38, 392–401 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-017-0022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-017-0022-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links