Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Is umbilical coiling genetically determined?

Abstract

Objective

Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes; however, the etiology of the umbilical coiling pattern is poorly understood.

Study design

Retrospective cohort of all twin deliveries >20 weeks in 2014. Pregnancies were dichotomized by chorionicity and the umbilical coiling index (UCI) and placental cord insertion location were compared. In cases with one or both cords hypercoiled, the direction and pattern of coiling were compared by chorionicity. A similar analysis was performed stratified by zygosity.

Results

Three hundred sisty two twin pairs were included; 26 (7.2%) monochorionic and 174 (87.0%) definitively dizygotic. Concordance in the UCI and coiling category were similar between dichorionic and monochorionic as well as dizygous and monozygous gestations, (73.2% vs 80.8%, pā€‰=ā€‰0.399 and 71.4% vs 80.8%, pā€‰=ā€‰0.399, respectively). Analyses of the coiling direction and pattern also demonstrated no difference by chorionicity or zygosity.

Conclusion

These data do not support a genetic basis for umbilical cord coiling.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaurasia B, Agarwal B. Helical structure of the human umbilical cord. Acta Anat. 1979;103:226ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:213689.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Herman A, Zabow P, Segal M, Ron-el R, Bukovsky Y, Caspi E. Extremely large number of twists of the umbilical cord causing torsion and intrauterine fetal death. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1991;35:165ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Rana J, Ebert GA, Kappy KA. Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:573ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Ezimokhai M, Rizk D, Thomas R. Maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol. 2000;17:441ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Devel Pathol. 2000;3:462ā€“71.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Strong T, Elliott J, Radin T. Non-coiled umbilical blood vessels: a new marker for the fetus at risk. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:409ā€“11.

    PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;95:8ā€“13.

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. De Laat MW, Franx A, Nikkels PG, Visser GH. Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse pregnancy outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:704ā€“9.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. de Laat MW, Franx A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Nikkels PG. Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1049ā€“55.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Patil NS, Kulkarni SR, Lohitashwa R. Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:1675ā€“7.

    PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Jessop FA, Lees CC, Pathak S, Hook CE, Sebire NJ. Umbilical cord coiling: clinical outcomes in an unselected population and systematic review. Virchows Arch. 2014;464:105ā€“12.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Dutman AC, Nikkels PG. Umbilical hypercoiling in 2nd- and 3rd-trimester intrauterine fetal death. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015;18:10ā€“6.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:763ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Lacro R, Jones K, Benirschke K. The umbilical cord twist: origin, direction, and relevance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:833ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Degani S, Lewinsky R, Aharoni A, Gonen R, Ohel G. Differences between twin umbilical coiling indices correlate to differences in twin weight and doppler indices. J Matern Fetal Investig. 1998;8:130ā€“3.

    PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Durig P, Di Naro E, Raio L. Sonographic umbilical cord morphometry and coiling patterns in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:851ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Beggan C, Mooney E, Downey P, Carroll S, Reardon W. A case of recurrent familial male miscarriages with hypercoiled umbilical cord: a possible X-linked association? Clin Dysmorphol. 2014;23:26ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Hoffman JD, Kleeman L, Kennelly K, Honey E, Reardon W. Three new families with recurrent male miscarriages and hypercoiled umbilical cord. Clin Dysmorphol. 2015;24:128ā€“31.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  20. Strong T, Jarles D, Vega J, Feldman D. The umbilical coiling index. Am J ofObstet Gynecol. 1994;170:29ā€“32.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ. Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta. 2013;34:583ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  22. Moessinger AC. Fetal akinesia deformation sequence: an animal model. Pediatrics. 1983;72:857ā€“63.

    PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  23. Miller M, Higginbottom MH, Smith DW. Short umbilical cord: its origin and relevance. Pediatrics. 1981;67:618ā€“21.

    PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Soernes S, Bakke T. The length of the human umbilical cord in twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:1229ā€“30.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  25. Ochshorn Y, Bibi G, Ascher-Landsberg J, Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB, Many A. Coiling characteristics of umbilical cords in breech vs. vertex presentation. J Perinat Med. 2009;37:525ā€“8.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Soernes S, Bakke T. The length of the human umbilical cord in vertex and breech presentations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154:1086ā€“7.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Cambiaso O, Zhao DP, Abasolo JI, Aiello HA, Oepkes D, Lopriore E, et al. Discordance of cord insertions as a predictor of discordant fetal growth in monochorionic twins. Placenta. 2016;47:81ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. De Paepe ME, Shapiro S, Hanley LC, Chu S, Luks FI. Correlation between cord insertion type and superficial choriovasculature in diamniotic-monochorionic twin placentas. Placenta. 2011;32:901ā€“5.

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding

The authors report no source of financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina K. Ayala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayala, N.K., Ernst, L.M. & Miller, E.S. Is umbilical coiling genetically determined?. J Perinatol 38, 653ā€“657 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0078-y

Search

Quick links