Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Severe maternal morbidity and related hospital quality measures in Maryland

Subjects

Abstract

Objective

To determine hospital characteristics and quality metrics associated with severe maternal morbidity (SMM) in Maryland.

Study Design

A population-based observational study of 364,113 statewide delivery hospitalizations during 2010–2015 linked with socio-economic community measures and hospital characteristics and quality measures. Multivariable logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations estimated SMM adjusting for individual, community, and hospital-level factors and clustering within hospitals and residence zip codes.

Results

The SMM prevalence was 197 per 10,000 deliveries. Adjusted SMM risk ratios were higher for younger (<20 years), older (35+ years), non-White non-Hispanic, unmarried, multiple substance users, women with multiple gestations, and chronic medical and mental health conditions than their counterparts. Communities with greater socio-economic disadvantage and hospitals with poorer patient experience and clinical care quality had higher rates of SMM.

Conclusion

Addressing socio-economic disparities and improving quality of care in delivery hospitals are key to reducing the SMM burden in Maryland.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Ko JY, Farr SL, Tong VT, Bruce FC, et al. Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now? J Women’s Health. 2014;23:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Maryland Maternal Mortality Review 2016 Annual Report. 2016. https://phpa.health.maryland.gov/mch/Documents/2016MMR_FINAL.pdf

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Compressed Mortality File 2010–2014 on CDC WONDER Online data base. http://wonder.cdc.gov/mortSQL.html [Accessed 22 March 2017]. Note: maternal deaths in Alaska, Delaware, Maine, Vermont and Wyoming excluded due to suppressed data.

  4. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Severe Maternal Morbidity in New York City, 2008–2012. New York, NY, 2016. Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/data/maternal-morbidity-report-08-12.pdf

  5. Furuta M, Sandall J, Cooper D, Cooper D, Bick D. The relationship between severe maternal morbidity and psychological health symptoms at 6–8 weeks postpartum: a prospective cohort study in one English maternity unit. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Severe maternal morbidity in the United States. 2017. www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/MaternalInfantHealth/Severematernalmorbidity.html

  7. Callaghan WM, MacKay AP, Berg CJ. Identification of severe maternal morbidity during delivery hospitalizations, United States, 1991-2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:133.e1–133.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray KE, Wallace ER, Nelson KR, Reed SD, Schiff MA. Population-based study of risk factors for severe maternal morbidity. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012;26:506–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geller SE, Rosenberg D, Cox SM, Brown ML, Simonson L, Driscoll CA, et al. The continuum of maternal morbidity and mortality: factors associated with severity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:939–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Huang Y, D’Alton ME, Wright JD. Hospital delivery volume, severe obstetrical morbidity, and failure to rescue. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;1:e1–e14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howell EA, Zeitlin J, Hebert PL, Balbierz A, Egorova N, et al. The association between hospital-level obstetric quality indicators and maternal and neonatal morbidity. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;312:1531–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Callaghan WM, Creanga AA, Kuklina EV. Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1029–36.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howell EA, Egorova N, Balbierz A, Zeitlin J, Herbert PL. Black-white differences in severe maternal morbidity and site of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:122e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Hospital Compare. http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/ [Accessed 19 April 2017].

  15. Jonkers M, Richters A, Zwart J, Roosmalen JV. Severe maternal morbidity among immigrant women in the Netherlands: patients’ perspectives. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19:144–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goffman D, Madden RC, Harrison EA, Merkatz IR, Chazotte C. Predictors of maternal mortality and near-miss maternal morbidity. J Perinatol. 2007;27:597–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Creanga AA, Bateman B, Kuklina E, Callaghan WM. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity: a multi-state analysis, 2008-10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:435.e1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindquist A, Noor N, Sullivan E, Knight M. The impact of socio-economic position on severe maternal morbidity outcomes among women in Australia: a national case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:1601–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Callaghan WM, Grobman WA, Kilpatrick SJ, Main EK, D’Alton M. Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: it’s time to start. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:978–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The Joint Commission. Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals, Update 2, January 2015: Sentinel Events: SE-1. http://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/CAMH_24_SE_all_CURRENT.pdf [Accessed 3 June 2016].

  21. Maurer M, Firminger K, Dardess P, Ikeler K, Sofaer S, Carman KL. Understanding consumer perceptions and awareness of hospital-based maternity care quality measures. Health Serv Res. 2016;51:1188–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Angood PB, Armstrong EM, Ashton D, Burstin H, Corry MP, Delbanco SF, et al. Blueprint for Action: steps toward high-quality, high volume maternity care system. Women’s Health Issues. 2010;20:S18–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyser KL, Lu X, Santillan DA, Santillan MK, Hunter SK, Cahill AG, et al. The association between hospital obstetrical volume and maternal postpartum complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:42.e1–42.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Janakiraman V, Lazar J, Joynt KE, Jha AK. Hospital volume, provider volume, and complications after childbirth in U.S. hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:521–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the support of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC) for supplying the hospitalization data used for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence D. Reid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reid, L.D., Creanga, A.A. Severe maternal morbidity and related hospital quality measures in Maryland. J Perinatol 38, 997–1008 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0096-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-018-0096-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links