Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Consensus Statement
  • Published:

Recommended standards for newborn ICU design, 9th edition

Abstract

The environment of care has a lasting impact on the patients, families, and caregivers who experience it. A newborn intensive care unit (NICU) is typically in use for 10–30 years, over which time decisions made during its design will have human and financial impacts far beyond the initial cost. Good planning is crucial, yet most participants in the planning process have little experience designing a NICU and may be driven as much by what they do not like in their existing NICU as by the evidence and experience reported by others. Standards generated by a group of experts in multiple disciplines can inform these planners, as well as the agencies developing building codes for NICUs. Now in its ninth iteration, these Recommended Standards continue to be refined as new evidence and experience accumulates, along with new guidance for couplet care in the NICU and for detection of latent safety risks prior to occupancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. White RD, Smith JA, Shepley MM. Committee to establish Recommended Standards for Newborn ICU Design. J Perinatol. 2013;33 Suppl 1:S2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Participants from the Ninth Consensus Conference on Newborn ICU Design, March 5, 2019, Clearwater Beach, Florida are listed in the “Appendix”.

Funding

This article is published as part of a supplement sponsored by Philips.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert D. White.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RDW has received consulting fees from Philips HealthTech, owns equity in Mednax, and received lecture fees from P+G (Pampers). The author also holds patents for two products (not for sale).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Consensus Committee on Recommended Design Standards for Advanced Neonatal Care

Appendix: Consensus Committee on Recommended Design Standards for Advanced Neonatal Care

Jesse Bender, Joy Browne, Michael S. Dunn, Skip Gregory, James Harrell, Debra Harris, Carol B. Jaeger, Beverley H. Johnson, Carole Kenner, Kathleen J.S. Kolberg, Von Lambert, George A. Little, Gilbert L. Martin, Lynne Wilson Orr, M. Kathleen Philbin, Kate Robson, Mardelle McCuskey Shepley, Judith A. Smith, Tammy S. Thompson, Scott Waltz, Robert D. White. Valuable technical assistance to the committee was also provided by Mark Rea and Jack Evans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

White, R.D., on behalf of the Consensus Committee on Recommended Design Standards for Advanced Neonatal Care. Recommended standards for newborn ICU design, 9th edition. J Perinatol 40 (Suppl 1), 2–4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0766-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-0766-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links