Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

A quality improvement initiative to reduce necrotizing enterocolitis in high-risk neonates

Journal of Perinatology volume 43, pages 97–102 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective

Prompted by an acute increase in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) rates, we aimed to decrease the rate of stage 2 or greater NEC in infants born at <1500 grams or <30 weeks gestational age from 19.5% to less than 9.7% (a 50% reduction) within 18 months, without adversely affecting central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates.

Study design

We utilized Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) as our improvement model. Informed by our key driver diagram and root cause analyses, six Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were completed.

Results

147 infants in the QI initiative had a median gestational age of 28.1 weeks and a median birthweight of 1070 grams. NEC rates decreased from the QI baseline of 19.5% to 6% (p = 0.03). Oral care administration increased, and maximal gavage tube dwell time decreased.

Conclusion

NEC rates decreased during this QI initiative through a combination of multidisciplinary interventions aimed at reducing dysbiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Key driver diagram summarizing the improvement theory.
Fig. 2: Annotated P-chart of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) rate during the quality improvement (QI) initiative.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sharma R, Hudak ML. A clinical perspective of necrotizing enterocolitis: past, present, and future. Clin Perinatol. 2013;40:27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neu J. Necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1996;43:409–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mowitz ME, Dukhovny D, Zupancic JAF. The cost of necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:416–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bazacliu C, Neu J. Necrotizing enterocolitis: long term complications. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2019;15:115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rose AT, Patel RM. A critical analysis of risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;23:374–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cacho NT, Parker LA, Neu J. Necrotizing enterocolitis and human milk feeding. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xiong T, Maheshwari A, Neu J, Ei-Saie A, Pammi M. An overview of systematic reviews of randomized-controlled trials for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Neonatology. 2020;117:46–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Denning NL, Prince JM. Neonatal intestinal dysbiosis in necrotizing enterocolitis. Mol Med. 2018;24:4.

  9. Pammi M, Cope J, Tarr PI, Warner BB, Morrow AL, Mai V, et al. Intestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2017;5:31.

  10. Bazacliu C, Neu J. Pathophysiology of necrotizing enterocolitis: an update. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2019;15:68–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas A, Cole TJ. Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 1990;336:1519–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawöger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, et al. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatrics. 2010;156:562–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan RL, Preidis GA, Kashyap PC, Weizman AV, Sadeghirad B. Probiotics reduce mortality and morbidity in preterm, low-birth-weight infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:467–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cotten CM, Taylor S, Stoll B, Goldberg RN, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ, et al. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123:58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenwood C, Morrow AL, Lagomarcino AJ, Altaye M, Taft DH, Yu Z, et al. Early empiric antibiotic use in preterm infants is associated with lower bacterial diversity and higher relative abundance of Enterobacter. J Pediatr. 2014;165:23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Romaine A, Ye D, Ao Z, Fang F, Johnson O, Blake T, et al. Safety of histamine-2 receptor blockers in hospitalized VLBW infants. Early Hum Dev. 2016;99:27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma A, Yang J, Li Y, Zhang X, Kang Y. Oropharyngeal colostrum therapy reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in very low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Res. 2021;89:54–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garofalo NA, Caplan MS. Oropharyngeal mother’s milk: state of the science and influence on necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46:77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel AL, Trivedi S, Bhandari NP, Ruf A, Scala CM, Witowitch G, et al. Reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants using quality-improvement methods. J Perinatol. 2014;34:850–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yee WH, Soraisham AS, Shah VS, Aziz K, Yoon W, Lee SK. Incidence and timing of presentation of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129:e298–e304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Battersby C, Santhalingam T, Costeloe K, Modi N. Incidence of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis in high-income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F182–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walsh MC, Kliegman RM. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1986;33:179–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moreno-Fernandez J, Sánchez-Martínez B, Serrano-López L, Martín-Álvarez E, Diaz-Castro J, Peña-Caballero M, et al. Enhancement of immune response mediated by oropharyngeal colostrum administration in preterm neonates. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019;30:234–41.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quigley M, Embleton ND, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7:1465–858.

  25. American Society for Quality. The Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) Process. [Accessed June 20, 2022]. Available from: https://asq.org/quality-resources/dmaic

  26. Pyzdek T, Keller PA. The Six Sigma Handbook: A Complete Guide for Green Belts, Black Belts, and Managers at All Levels, Third edn. McGraw Hill: New York, NY, 2010.

  27. Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. NeoMed. NeoConnect Feeding Tubes for ENFit Instructions for Use. 2018. [Accessed June 11, 2020]. Available from: https://www.neomedinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/NeoConnect-Feeding-Tubes-for-ENFit-Instructions-for-Use.pdf

  29. Patel AL, Meier PP, Canvasser J. Strategies to increase the use of mother’s own milk for infants at risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res. 2020;88:21–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Meier PP, Johnson TJ, Patel AL, Rossman B. Evidence-based methods that promote human milk feeding of preterm infants. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Miracle DJ, Meier PP, Bennett PA. Mothers’ decisions to change from formula to mothers’ milk for very-low-birth-weight infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33:692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Patel AL, Jegier BJ, Bruns NE. Improving the use of human milk during and after the NICU stay. Clin Perinatol. 2010;37:217–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Committee on nutrition, Section on breastfeeding, Committee on fetus and newborn, Daniels S, Corkins M, de Ferranti S, et al. Donor Human Milk for the High-Risk Infant: Preparation, Safety, and Usage Options in the United States. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20163440.

  34. Montgomery DC. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013.

  35. Hurrell E, Kucerova E, Loughlin M, Caubilla-Barron J, Hilton A, Armstrong R, et al. Neonatal enteral feeding tubes as loci for colonisation by members of the Enterobacteriaceae. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. van den Akker CHP, van Goudoever JB, Shamir R, Domellöf M, Embleton ND, Hojsak I, et al. Probiotics and preterm infants: a position paper by the European society for paediatric gastroenterology hepatology and nutrition committee on nutrition and the European society for paediatric gastroenterology hepatology and nutrition working group for probiotics and prebiotics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70:664–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bafeta A, Koh M, Riveros C, Raaud P. Harms reporting in randomized controlled trials of interventions aimed at modifying microbiota. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Esaiassen E, Cavanagh P, Hjerde E, Simonsen GS, Støen R, Klingenberg C. Bifidobacterium longumSubspeciesinfantisBacteremia in 3 Extremely Preterm Infants Receiving Probiotics. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:1664–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vermeulen MJ, Luijendijk A, Toledo L, Kaam AH, Reiss IKM. Quality of probiotic products for preterm infants: Contamination and missing strains. Acta Paediatrica. 2020;109:276–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Poindexter B, Cummings J, Hand I, Adams-Chapman I, Aucott SW, Puopolo KM, et al. Use of probiotics in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2021;147:e2021051485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaplan HC, Provost LP, Froehle CM, Margolis PA. The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Larson CE, Larson C, LaFasto FMJ, Fasto FML. Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong. SAGE Publications, 1989.

  43. Gray KD, Messina JA, Cortina C, Owens T, Fowler M, Foster M, et al. Probiotic use and safety in the neonatal intensive care unit: a matched cohort study. J Pediatr. 2020;222:59–64.e51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Javidi D, Wang Z, Rajasekaran S, Hussain N. Temporal and seasonal variations in incidence of stage II and III NEC—a 28-year epidemiologic study from tertiary NICUs in Connecticut, USA. J Perinatol. 2021;41:1100–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Roxanne Torgerson, RN and Angela Giese, RN for their advocacy in promoting QI interventions in the NICU during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Stephanie C. Mavis, Megan M. Misgen, Laura A. Schram, Virginia S. Schuning, Raymond C. Stetson & Jennifer L. Fang

  2. Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Maria C. Gallup & Mikael Meyer

  3. Clinical Nutrition, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Danielle L. Herzog

  4. Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

    Brandi N. Smith

Authors
  1. Stephanie C. Mavis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria C. Gallup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mikael Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Megan M. Misgen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura A. Schram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danielle L. Herzog
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brandi N. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Virginia S. Schuning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Raymond C. Stetson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jennifer L. Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SCM: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualization, writing- original draft. CMG: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing- review & editing. MM, DLH, BNS, RCS: Methodology, writing- review & editing. MMM and LAS: Methodology, investigation, writing- review & editing. VSS: Project administration, writing- review & editing. JLF: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, supervision, writing- review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie C. Mavis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mavis, S.C., Gallup, M.C., Meyer, M. et al. A quality improvement initiative to reduce necrotizing enterocolitis in high-risk neonates. J Perinatol 43, 97–102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01476-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-022-01476-5

Search

Advanced search

Quick links