Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Dilemmas in establishing preterm enteral feeding: where do we start and how fast do we go?

Journal of Perinatology volume 43, pages 1194–1199 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Beginning and achieving full enteral nutrition is a key step in the care of preterm infants, particularly very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. As is true for many organ system-specific complications of prematurity, the gastrointestinal tract must complete in utero development ex utero while concurrently serving a physiologic role reserved for after completion of full term development. The preterm gut must assume the placental function of the interface between a source of energy, precursors for anabolism, and micronutrients, and the developing infant–through digestion and absorption of milk, instead of directly from the mother via the uteroplacental interface. The benefits of enteral nourishment in preterm infants are counterbalanced by gastrointestinal complications of prematurity: dysmotility leading to difficulty establishing and advancing feeds, and the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Concern for these complications can prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with an associated increase in risk for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis or liver disease (PNALD). Thus, a daily issue facing neonatologists caring for preterm infants is how to optimally begin, advance, and reach full enteral nutrition sufficient to satisfy the nutrient, energy, and fluid requirements of VLBW infants while minimizing risk. In this perspective, we provide an overview of the approaches and supporting data for starting and advancing enteral feeds in preterm infants, particularly very low birth weight infants, and we discuss the significant gaps in knowledge that accompany current approaches. This framework recognizes the dilemmas of preterm feeding initiation and advancement and identifies areas of opportunity for further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Dilemmas in starting and progressing feedings in preterm infants.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boscarino G, Conti MG, Di Chiara M, Bianchi M, OnestĂ  E, Faccioli F, et al. Early Enteral Feeding Improves Tolerance of Parenteral Nutrition in Preterm Newborns. Nutrients. 2021;13:3886.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rigo J, Pieltain C, Salle B, Senterre J. Enteral calcium, phosphate and vitamin D requirements and bone mineralization in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:969–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Demay MB, Sabbagh Y, Carpenter TO. Calcium and vitamin D: what is known about the effects on growing bone. Pediatrics. 2007;119:S141–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fenton TR, Cormack B, Goldberg D, Nasser R, Alshaikh B, Eliasziw M, et al. “Extrauterine growth restriction” and “postnatal growth failure” are misnomers for preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2020;40:704–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Young L, Oddie SJ, McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;1:CD001970.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker MG, Stellwagen LM, Noble L, Kim JH, Poindexter BB, Puopolo KM. Promoting Human Milk and Breastfeeding for the Very Low Birth Weight Infant. Pediatrics. 2021;148:e2021054272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sullivan S, Schanler RJ, Kim JH, Patel AL, Trawöger R, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, et al. An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. J Pediatr. 2010;156:562–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sisk PM, Lovelady CA, Dillard RG, Gruber KJ, O’Shea TM. Early human milk feeding is associated with a lower risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2007;27:428–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patra K, Hamilton M, Johnson TJ, Greene M, Dabrowski E, Meier PP, et al. NICU Human Milk Dose and 20-Month Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Neonatology. 2017;112:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kantorowska A, Wei JC, Cohen RS, Lawrence RA, Gould JB, Lee HC. Impact of Donor Milk Availability on Breast Milk Use and Necrotizing Enterocolitis Rates. Pediatrics. 2016;137:e20153123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Veenstra M, Danielson L, Brownie E, Saba M, Natarajan G, Klein M. Enteral nutrition and total parenteral nutrition components in the course of total parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Surgery. 2014;156:578–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shores DR, Bullard JE, Aucott SW, Stewart FD, Haney C, Tymann H, et al. Implementation of feeding guidelines in infants at risk of intestinal failure. J Perinatol. 2015;35:941–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kulkarni S, Mercado V, Rios M, Arboleda R, Gomara R, Muinos W, et al. Breast milk is better than formula milk in preventing parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in infants receiving prolonged parenteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:383–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher D, Cochran KM, Provost LP, Patterson J, Bristol T, Metzguer K, et al. Reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections in North Carolina NICUs. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD000504.

  16. Heiman H, Schanler RJ. Enteral nutrition for premature infants: the role of human milk. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;12:26–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Morgan J, Bombell S, McGuire W. Early trophic feeding versus enteral fasting for very preterm or very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD000504.

  18. Cilieborg MS, Boye M, Thymann T, Jensen BB, Sanglid PT. Diet-dependent effects of minimal enteral nutrition on intestinal function and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm pigs. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2011;35:32–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan J, Young L, and McGuire W. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD001970.

  20. Oddie SJ, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;8:CD001241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwok TC, Dorling J, Gale C. Early enteral feeding in preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43:151159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, Wilson J, Janes M, McDonald K, et al. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients. 2015;7:423–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Klingenberg C, Embleton N, Jacobs SE, O’Connell LAF, Kuschel CA. Enteral feeding practices in very preterm infants: an international survey. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97:F56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haschke F, Binder C, Huber-Dangl M, Haiden N. Early-Life Nutrition, Growth Trajectories, and Long-Term Outcome. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2019;90:107–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Waard M, Li Y, Zhu Y, Ayede AI, Berrington J, Bloomfield FH, et al. Time to Full Enteral Feeding for Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants Varies Markedly Among Hospitals Worldwide But May Not Be Associated With Incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The NEOMUNE-NeoNutriNet Cohort Study. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2019;43:658–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennedy KA, Tyson JE, Chamnanvanikij S. Early versus delayed initiation of progressive enteral feedings for parenterally fed low birth weight or preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD001970.

  27. McClure RJ. Trophic feeding of the preterm infant. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2001;90:19–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salas AA, Li P, Parks K, Lal CV, Martin CR, Carlo WA. Early progressive feeding in extremely preterm infants: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018;107:365–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Brown HO, Levine ML, Lipkin M. Inhibition of intestinal epithelial cell renewal and migration induced by starvation. Am J Physiol. 1963;205:868–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes CA, Dowling RH. Speed of onset of adaptive mucosal hypoplasia and hypofunction in the intestine of parenterally fed rats. Clin Sci (Lond). 1980;59:317–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Berseth CL, Lichtenberger LM, Morriss FH Jr. Comparison of the gastrointestinal growth- promoting effects of rat colostrum and mature milk in newborn rats in vivo. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;37:52–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berseth CL, Nordyke CK, Valdes MG, Furlow BL, Go VL. Responses of gastrointestinal peptides and motor activity to milk and water feedings in preterm and term infants. Pediatr Res. 1992;31:587–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Berseth CL, Nordyke C. Enteral nutrients promote postnatal maturation of intestinal motor activity in preterm infants. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:G1046–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Baker JH, Berseth CL. Duodenal motor responses in preterm infants fed formula with varying concentrations and rates of infusion. Pediatr Res. 1997;42:618–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burrin D, Sangild PT, Stoll B, Thymann T, Buddington R, Marini J, et al. Translational Advances in Pediatric Nutrition and Gastroenterology: New Insights from Pig Models. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2020;8:321–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Berseth CL, Bisquera JA, Paje VU. Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2003;111:529–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dorling J, Hewer O, Hurd M, Bari V, Bosiak B, Bowler U, et al. Two speeds of increasing milk feeds for very preterm or very low-birthweight infants: the SIFT RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24:1–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramaswamy VV, Bandyopadhyay T, Ahmed J, Bandiya P, Zivanovic S, Roehr CC. Enteral Feeding Strategies in Preterm Neonates </=32 weeks Gestational Age: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Ann Nutr Metab. 2021;77:204–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Paul SP, Kirkham EN, Hawton KA, Mannix PA. Feeding growth restricted premature neonates: a challenging perspective. Sudan J Paediatr. 2018;18:5–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kempley S, Gupta N, Linsell L, Dorling J, McCormick K, Mannix P, et al. Feeding infants below 29 weeks’ gestation with abnormal antenatal Doppler: analysis from a randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F6–F11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Aradhya AS, Mukhopadhyay K, Saini SS, Sundaram V, Dutta S, Kumar P. Feed intolerance in preterm neonates with antenatal reverse end diastolic flow (REDF) in umbilical artery: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33:1846–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Boehm G, Senger H, Müller D, Beyreiss K, Räihä NC. Metabolic differences between AGA- and SGA-infants of very low birthweight. II. Relationship to protein intake. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1988;77:642–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Walsh V, Brown JVE, Copperthwaite BR, Oddie SJ, McGuire W. Early full enteral feeding for preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;12:CD013542.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hair AB, Scottoline B, Good M. Dilemmas in human milk fortification. J Perinatol. 2023;43:103–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Saha LC YR, Hoque M, Chowdhury MAKA. Slow versus Rapid Advancement of Enteral Feeding in Preterm Infants Less than 34 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatol Clin Pediatr. 2019;6:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Montealegre-Pomar ADP, Bertolotto-Cepeda AM, Romero-Marquez Y, Muñoz-Ramírez KJ. Effectiveness and Safety of Fast Enteral Advancement in Preterm Infants Between 1000 and 2000 g of Birth Weight. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2021;45:578–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang WC, Fogel A, Lauria ME, Ferguson K, Smith ER. Fast Feed Advancement for Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2022;150:e2022057092G–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jasani B, Patole S. Standardized feeding regimen for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: an updated systematic review. J Perinatol. 2017;37:827–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maas C, Franz AR, von Krogh S, Arand J, Poets CF. Growth and morbidity of extremely preterm infants after early full enteral nutrition. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103:F79–F81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Alshaikh B, Dharel D, Yusuf K, Singhal N. Early total enteral feeding in stable preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34:1479–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bell KA, Ramel SE, Robinson DT, Wagner CL, Scottoline B, Belfort MB. Body composition measurement for the preterm neonate: using a clinical utility framework to translate research tools into clinical care. J Perinatol. 2022;42:1550–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank those who contributed to the research that provided the foundation for what is currently known for this topic and those who will continue discovery in the future.

Funding

BS is funded by the Gerber Foundation grant #9161 and the National Institutes of Health grant R01HD097367. Neither of the funding sources had any role in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts T.H.Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA

    Maushumi Assad & Kerri Gosselin

  2. Graduate Programs in Human Nutrition, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Maggie Jerome

  3. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Amy Olyaei, Samantha Nizich, Madeline Hedges & Brian Scottoline

Authors
  1. Maushumi Assad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maggie Jerome
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amy Olyaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Samantha Nizich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Madeline Hedges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kerri Gosselin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Brian Scottoline
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BS, MA, and MJ conceptualized and designed the perspective; all authors made substantitive contributions to drafting the original paper; BS edited the paper; MA, MJ, AO, SN, and MH provided additional review, editing and feedback. All authors have approved the final paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Scottoline.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assad, M., Jerome, M., Olyaei, A. et al. Dilemmas in establishing preterm enteral feeding: where do we start and how fast do we go?. J Perinatol 43, 1194–1199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01665-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01665-w

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links