Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Expert Review
  • Published:

The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concept of hebephrenia: a close reading of relevant texts of Hecker, Daraszkiewicz, and Kraepelin

Molecular Psychiatry volume 25, pages 180–193 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In developing his mature concept of hebephrenic dementia praecox (DP) in his 4th (1893) through 6th textbook editions (1899), Kraepelin worked from the hebephrenic syndrome first described by Hecker (1871) and then carefully studied by his student Daraszkiewicz (1892). Working under Kraepelin’s supervision, Daraszkiewicz followed Hecker in emphasizing several key features of hebephrenia (distinctive deteriorative course, importance of silliness and minimal positive psychotic symptoms) but expanded the syndrome to include cases developing severe dementia, rejected the link to prodromal depressive and manic phases, and reduced the emphasis on thought disorder. Daraszkiewicz proposed a soft subtyping of hebephrenia based on level of deterioration, which Kraepelin adopted in his 4th edition with an additional emphasis on severe positive psychotic symptoms. In his 5th edition, Kraepelin created a third subform with even more pronounced and bizarre delusions and hallucinations. In his 6th edition, which contained his first articulation of DP, Kraepelin eliminated his hebephrenia subforms presenting a single syndrome, which, compared to Hecker, included more emphasis on positive psychotic and catatonic symptoms and severe dementia. Kraepelin’s paths to hebephrenic and paranoid DP differed in important ways. Paranoid DP was a de novo syndrome created by differentiation from paranoia. Hebephrenia, by contrast, evolved from a disorder created in the Kahlbaum/Hecker paradigm of the iterative study of clinical features, course and outcome. Kraepelin further implemented this approach in substantially reworking, over several drafts, the hebephrenic syndrome to fit into his emerging construct of dementia praecox.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kendler KS. The development of Kraepelin’s Mature diagnostic concepts of paranoia (Die Verrücktheit) and paranoid dementia praecox (Dementia Paranoides): A close reading of his textbooks from 1887 to 1899. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75.12:1280–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hecker E. Die hebephrenie: Ein beitrag zur klinischen psychiatrie. Archiv fur pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und fur klinische Medizin. 1871;52:394–429.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kraam A. Classic text no. 78: ‘Hebephrenia. A contribution to clinical psychiatry’ by Dr. Ewald Hecker in Gorlitz (1871) (Translation (Part 2) by Abdullah Kraam). Hist Psychiatry. 2009;20:233–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraam A. Classic text no. 77: ‘Hebephrenia. A contribution to clinical psychiatry’ by Dr. Ewald Hecker in Gorlitz (1871) (Introduction and translation (Part 1) by Abdullah Kraam). Hist Psychiatry. 2009;20:87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daraszkiewicz L. Ueber Hebephrenie, insbesondere deren schwere Form. Inaugural-Dissertation. (Dorpat: Laakmann’s Buch- und Steindruckerei); 1892.

  6. Kraepelin E. Psychiatry, a textbook for students and physicians (Translation of the 6th edition of Psychiatrie-Translator Volume 2-Sabine Ayed). Jaques Quen. ed. Canton, MA: Science History Publications; 1990.

  7. Kahlbaum K. Die Gruppierung der psychischen Krankheiten und die Einteilung der Seelenstörungen. Danzig: A.W. Kafemann; 1863.

  8. Kraam A, Phillips P. Hebephrenia: a conceptual history. Hist Psychiatry. 2012;23:387–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraepelin E. Compendium der Psychiatrie: Zum Gebrauche für Studirende und Aerzte. Leipzig: Verlag von Ambr. Abel; 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie: Ein kurzes Lehrbuch für Studirende un Aerzte. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Abel; 1887.

  11. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie: Ein kurzes Lehrbuch für Studirende un Aerzte. 3rd ed. Leipzig: J.A. Barth; 1889.

  12. Kendler KS, Engstrom EJ. Kahlbaum, Hecker, and Kraepelin and the transition from psychiatric symptom complexes to empirical disease forms. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:102–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berrios GE. Dementia: historical overview. In: Burns A, Levy R, editors. Dementia. 1st ed. London, UK: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1994. p. 5–19.

  14. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie: Ein kurzes Lehrbuch für Studirende un Aerzte. 4th ed. Leipzig: Abel; 1893.

  15. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie: Ein Lehrbuch fur Studirende und Aerzte. 5 ed. Leipzig: Barth; 1896.

  16. Kraepelin E. Psychiatrie: Ein Lehrbuch fur Studirende und Aerzte. 6th ed. Leipzig: Barth; 1899.

  17. Diem O. Dementia simplex. Arch Psychiat Nervenkr. 1903;37:111–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraepelin E. Memoirs/Emil Kraepelin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kraepelin E. Dementia praecox and paraphrenia. Huntington, NY: Krieger Publishing; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kendler KS. The transformation of American psychiatric nosology at the dawn of the twentieth century. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;21:152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Mental Diseases. Public Document Number 20: Forty-Second Annual Report of The Trustees of the Danvers State Hospital at Danvers, Mass. for the Year Ending November 30, 1919. Boston, MA: Wright & Potter Printing Company, State Printers; 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Department of Mental Diseases. Public Document Number 20: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Annual Report of the Trustees of the Danvers State Hospital for the Year Ending November 30, 1920. Boston, MA: Wright & Potter Printing Company, State Printers; 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Department of Mental Diseases. Public Document Number 20: The Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Annual Report of the Trustees of the Danvers State Hospital for the Year Ending November 30, 1921. Boston, MA: Wright & Potter Printing Company, State Printers; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boisen AT. Types of dementia praecox - a study of psychiatry classification. Psychiatry. 1938;1:233–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morrison JR. Changes in subtype diagnosis of schizophrenia: 1920-1966. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:674–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stompe T, Ortwein-Swoboda G, Ritter K, Marquart B, Schanda H. The impact of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of schizophrenic subtypes. Compr Psychiatry. 2005;46:433–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Inoue S. Hebephrenia as the most prevalent subtype of schizophrenia in Japan. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1993;47:505–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stephens JH. Long-term prognosis and followup in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1978;4:25–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kendler KS, Gruenberg AM, Tsuang MT. Outcome of schizophrenic subtypes defined by four diagnostic systems. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41:149–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fenton WS, McGlashan TH. Natural history of schizophrenia subtypes. I. Longitudinal study of paranoid, hebephrenic, and undifferentiated schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48:969–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Astrup C, Fossum A, Holmboe R. Prognosis in functional psychoses: Clinical, social and genetic aspects. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas: Publisher; 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Braff DL, Ryan J, Rissling AJ, Carpenter WT. Lack of use in the literature from the last 20 years supports dropping traditional schizophrenia subtypes from DSM-5 and ICD-11. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:751–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tandon R, Gaebel W, Barch DM, Bustillo J, Gur RE, Heckers S, et al. Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blustein BE. Preserve your love for science: Life of William S Hammond, American neurologist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hammond WA. A treatise on insanity in its medical relations. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1883.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Craig M. Psychological medicine: A manual on mental diseases for practitioners and students. London: J. & A. Churchill; 1912.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cole RH. Mental diseases: a text-book of psychiatry for medical students and practitioners. first ed. London: University of London Press; 1913.

  38. White WA. Outlines of psychiatry: Nervous and Mental Disease Monograph Series No. 1. Fourth ed. New York: The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company; 1913.

  39. Jelliffe SE, White WA. Diseases of the nervous system: A text-book of neurology and psychiatry. Fourth ed., revised, rewritten and enlarged ed. Philadelphia and New York: Lea & Febiger; 1923.

  40. Yellowlees H. Clinical Lectures on psychological medicine. Baltimore, MD: J. & A. Churchill; 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sadler WS. Theory and practice of psychiatry. St Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1936.

  42. Noyes AP. A textbook of psychiatry. Second ed. New York: The Macmillan Company; 1936.

  43. Henderson DK, Gillespie RD. A text-book of psychiatry for students and practitioners. Sixth ed. London: Oxford University Press; Oxford Medical Publications; 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Biddle WE, Van Sickel M. Introduction to psychiatry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1948.

  45. Mayer-Gross W, Slater E, Roth M. Clinical psychiatry. First ed. London: Cassell and Company LTD; 1954.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Translations from the German used in this report were performed in collaboration with Ms. Astrid Klee. Dr. Joel Braslow provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript and references to US state hospital reports. Dr. Eric Engstrom guided me to key historical documents.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, and Departments of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Kenneth S. Kendler

Authors
  1. Kenneth S. Kendler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth S. Kendler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kendler, K.S. The development of Kraepelin’s mature diagnostic concept of hebephrenia: a close reading of relevant texts of Hecker, Daraszkiewicz, and Kraepelin. Mol Psychiatry 25, 180–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0411-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0411-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links