Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Population Study Article
  • Published:

Outcomes up to age 36 months after congenital Zika virus infection—U.S. states

Abstract

Background

To characterize neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children up to 36 months of age with congenital Zika virus exposure.

Methods

From the U.S. Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry, a national surveillance system to monitor pregnancies with laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection, pregnancy outcomes and presence of Zika associated birth defects (ZBD) were reported among infants with available information. Neurologic sequelae and developmental delay were reported among children with ≥1 follow-up exam after 14 days of age or with ≥1 visit with development reported, respectively.

Results

Among 2248 infants, 10.1% were born preterm, and 10.5% were small-for-gestational age. Overall, 122 (5.4%) had any ZBD; 91.8% of infants had brain abnormalities or microcephaly, 23.0% had eye abnormalities, and 14.8% had both. Of 1881 children ≥1 follow-up exam reported, neurologic sequelae were more common among children with ZBD (44.6%) vs. without ZBD (1.5%). Of children with ≥1 visit with development reported, 46.8% (51/109) of children with ZBD and 7.4% (129/1739) of children without ZBD had confirmed or possible developmental delay.

Conclusion

Understanding the prevalence of developmental delays and healthcare needs of children with congenital Zika virus exposure can inform health systems and planning to ensure services are available for affected families.

Impact

  • We characterize pregnancy and infant outcomes and describe neurodevelopmental abnormalities up to 36 months of age by presence of Zika associated birth defects (ZBD).

  • Neurologic sequelae and developmental delays were common among children with ZBD.

  • Children with ZBD had increased frequency of neurologic sequelae and developmental delay compared to children without ZBD.

  • Longitudinal follow-up of infants with Zika virus exposure in utero is important to characterize neurodevelopmental delay not apparent in early infancy, but logistically challenging in surveillance models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Frequency of neurologic sequelae by presence of ZBD.
Fig. 2: Age at assessment (in months) of neurodevelopment by presence of ZBD.
Fig. 3: Children with confirmed or possible developmental delay across developmental domains by presence of ZBD.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

These data are collected under relevant provisions of the Public Health Service Act and are protected at CDC by an Assurance of Confidentiality (Section 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. §242 m(d)) (https://www.cdc.gov/od/science/integrity/confidentiality/), which prohibits use or disclosure of any identifiable or potentially identifiable information collected under the Assurance for purposes other than those set out in the Assurance. Requests for access will be considered on a case-by-case basis, and inquiries should be directed to setnet@cdc.gov.

References

  1. Wheeler, A. C. Development of infants with congenital Zika syndrome: What do we know and what can we expect? Pediatrics 141, S154–s60 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds, M. R. et al. Vital signs: Update on Zika virus-associated birth defects and evaluation of all U.S. infants with congenital Zika virus exposure—U.S. Zika pregnancy registry, 2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 66, 366–73 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Honein, M. A. et al. Birth defects among fetuses and infants of US women with evidence of possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy. JAMA 317, 59–68 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rice, M. E. et al. Vital signs: Zika-associated birth defects and neurodevelopmental abnormalities possibly associated with congenital Zika virus infection—U.S. territories and freely associated states, 2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 67, 858–67 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Alves, L. V., Paredes, C. E., Silva, G. C., Mello, J. G. & Alves, J. G. Neurodevelopment of 24 children born in Brazil with congenital Zika syndrome in 2015: a case series study. BMJ Open 8, e021304 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Faical, A. V. et al. Neurodevelopmental delay in normocephalic children with in utero exposure to Zika virus. BMJ Paediatr. Open 3, e000486 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopes Moreira, M. E. et al. Neurodevelopment in infants exposed to Zika virus in utero. N. Engl. J. Med 379, 2377–2379 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stringer, E. M. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of children following in utero exposure to Zika in Nicaragua. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72, e146–e53 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mercado-Reyes, M. et al. Pregnancy, birth, infant, and early childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes among a cohort of women with symptoms of Zika virus disease during pregnancy in three surveillance sites, project Vigilancia de Embarazadas con Zika (VEZ), Colombia, 2016–2018. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 6, 183 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Marbán-Castro, E. V. G. L. et al. Neurodevelopment in normocephalic children exposed to Zika virus in utero with no observable defects at birth: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J. Environ. Res Public Health 19, 7319 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mulkey, S. B. et al. Neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children with in utero Zika virus exposure without congenital Zika syndrome. JAMA Pediatr. 174, 269–276 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nielsen-Saines, K. et al. Delayed childhood neurodevelopment and neurosensory alterations in the second year of life in a prospective cohort of ZIKV-exposed children. Nat. Med. 25, 1213–1217 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Roth, N. M. et al. Zika-associated birth defects reported in pregnancies with laboratory evidence of confirmed or possible Zika virus infection—U.S. Zika pregnancy and infant registry, December 1, 2015-March 31, 2018. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. report. 71, 73–79 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Villar, J. et al. International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st). International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 384, 857–868 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paixao, E. S. et al. Mortality from congenital Zika syndrome—nationwide cohort study in Brazil. N. Engl. J. Med 386, 757–67 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olson, S. M. et al. Updated baseline prevalence of birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection. Birth Defects Res. 111, 938–40 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Adebanjo, T. et al. Update: Interim guidance for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection—United States, October 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 66, 1089–99 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoyert, D. L. & Gregory, E. C. W. Cause-of-death data from the fetal death file, 2015–2017. Natl. Vital-. Stat. Rep. 69, 1–20 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoen, B. et al. Pregnancy outcomes after ZIKV infection in French territories in the Americas. N. Engl. J. Med 378, 985–94 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Osterman M. J. K. Births in the United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief. 2021; 1–8.

  21. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Osterman M. J. K. Births in the United States, 2015. NCHS Data Brief. 2016; (no 258): 1–8.

  22. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Osterman M. J. K. Births in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017; (no 287): 1–8.

  23. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Osterman M. J. K. Births in the United States, 2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018; (no 318): 1–8.

  24. Martin J. A., Hamilton B. E., Osterman M. J. K. Births in the United States, 2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2019; (no 346): 1–8.

  25. Cooper, H. J. M. et al. Maternal Zika virus infection. Obstet. Gynecol. 134, 1197–204 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Satterfield-Nash, A. et al. Health and development at age 19–24 months of 19 children who were born with microcephaly and laboratory evidence of congenital Zika virus infection during the 2015 Zika virus outbreak—Brazil, 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 66, 1347–1351 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Daza, M. et al. Clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes based on brain imaging studies in a Colombian cohort of children with probable antenatal Zika virus exposure. Birth Defects Res. 113, 1299–312 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bergman, K., Forestieri, N. E., Di Bona, V. L., Grosse, S. D. & Moore, C. A. Medicaid healthcare expenditures for infants with birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection in North Carolina, 2011–2016. Birth Defects Res. 114, 80–89 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Black L. I., Vahratian A. & Hoffman H. J. Communication disorders and use of intervention services among children aged 3–17 years: United States, 2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2015; (205): 1-8.

  30. CDC. Learn the Signs. Act Early. 2021 [updated February 18, 2021]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/actearly/index.html.

  31. Lipkin, P. H. et al. Trends in pediatricians’ developmental screening: Pediatrics 145, 2002–2016 (2020).

Download references

Funding

Funding

CDC provided funding support and technical assistance to all U.S. states, territories, and freely associated states that reported cases to the U.S. Zika Pregnancy and Infant Registry (USZPIR) through the Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Prevention and Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases (ELC) cooperative agreement (https://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dpei/epidemiology-laboratory-capacity.html) and to selected jurisdictions through the Zika Local Health Department Initiative (https://www.cdc.gov/pregnancy/zika/research/lhdi.html).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.N., K.W., D.C., N.R., M.R., C.C., V.T. conceptualized the study; K.W., V.T., took responsibility for the integrity of the study; M.R., A.A., E.L., A.E., S.S., S.S., N.L., M.A., P.L., S.K., S.B., L.L., K.S., M.G., R.B., S.K., U.H., A.L., M.C., T.W., J.T., N.M., N.A.B., C.S., J.F., S.H., A.N., L.I., S.A., E.P., E.S., D.R., M.M., B.S., E.L., L.D., D.C., P.R., E.F., M.M., K.S., A.C., V.L., S.B., L.O., L.C., L.R. coauthors conducted the data collection, data quality checks, are reported data to CDC; S.G.C., C.A.M., K.W., N.R., K.A., S.B., R.D., C.B. participated in the clinical review to determine whether pregnancies met surveillance case definition; V.N., D.C., N.R. conducted the data analysis and replication; V.N., D.C., K.W., N.R., S.B., V.T. participated in drafting the manuscript; all authors contributed to reviewing and revising the manuscript’s content and approving the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varsha Neelam.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the California Department of Public Health or the California Health and Human Services Agency nor the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Patient consent

Patient consent was not required as this activity was conducted as part of public health surveillance and deemed not research at CDC, thus exempt from IRB review.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neelam, V., Woodworth, K.R., Chang, D.J. et al. Outcomes up to age 36 months after congenital Zika virus infection—U.S. states. Pediatr Res 95, 558–565 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02787-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02787-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links