Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Case Report
  • Published:

Navigating the complexity of spinal cord injuries with retained foreign bodies and the diagnostic challenge of lead toxicity—a case report

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Retained shrapnel from gunshots is a common occurrence; however, retained shrapnel within the spinal canal is exceedingly uncommon. Guidelines for removal and treatment of these cases are a difficult topic, as surgical removal is not necessarily without consequence, and retention can lead to possible further injury or a secondary disease process of plumbism, which can be difficult to diagnose in this population.

Case presentation

This case report provides a unique example of a young patient with retained shrapnel from a gunshot. This patient suffered an initial spinal cord injury due to a gunshot and secondarily presented with abdominal pain, fatigue, elevated blood lead levels, and was diagnosed with plumbism. This was addressed with operative removal of shrapnel and posterior instrumented spinal fusion, resulting in decreased lead levels and symptom resolution postoperatively.

Discussion

Lead toxicity risk in patients with retained shrapnel, particularly in the spine, warrants vigilant monitoring. While management guidelines lack consensus, symptomatic lead toxicity may necessitate intervention. Residual neurological deficits complicate evaluation, emphasizing individualized management decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pre-operative full spine X-rays.
Fig. 2: Pre-operative advanced imaging.
Fig. 3: Post op full spine X-rays.
Fig. 4: Patient’s lead levels over time.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data generated or analyzed during this study was made up of several single data points recording this patient’s lead levels over time can be found within the published article and its supplementary files.

Change history

  • 29 April 2024

    The last word of the article title has been corrected.

References

  1. Zwald ML, Holland KM, Bowen DA, Simon TR, Dahlberg LL, Stein Z, et al. Using the centers for disease control and prevention’s national syndromic surveillance program data to monitor trends in us emergency department visits for firearm injuries, 2018 to 2019. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79:465–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.01.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman EJ, Wiebe DJ, Xiong RA, Morrison CN, Seamon MJ, Delgado MK. Epidemiologic trends in fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries in the US, 2009-2017. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181:237–44. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nickel WN, Steelman TJ, Sabath ZR, Potter BK. Extra-articular retained missiles; is surveillance of lead levels needed? Mil Med. 2018;183:e107–e113. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usx076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen MP, Reich MS, OʼDonnell JA. Infection and complications after low-velocity intra-articular gunshot injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:330–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000823.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rentfrow RV, Elia C, Sethi A. Lead toxicity and management of gunshot wounds in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2353–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2805-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Towner JE, Pieters TA, Maurer PK. Lead toxicity from intradiscal retained bullet fragment: management considerations and recommendations. World Neurosurg. 2020;141:377–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shefa ST, Héroux P. Both physiology and epidemiology support zero tolerable blood lead levels. Toxicol Lett. 2017;280:232–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.08.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Araújo GC, Mourão NT, Pinheiro IN, Xavier AR, Gameiro VS. Lead toxicity risks in gunshot victims. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140220. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitra P, Sharma S, Purohit P, Sharma P. Clinical and molecular aspects of lead toxicity: an update. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2017;54:506–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2017.1408562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dienstknecht T, Horst K, Sellei RM, Berner A, Nerlich M, HardCastle TC. Indications for bullet removal: overview of the literature, and clinical practice guidelines for European trauma surgeons. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-011-0170-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ezekial J Koslosky MD—Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing Review and Editing, Project Administration. Samuel Oshoba BA—Writing—Original Draft, Writing Review and Editing. Connor Armstrong MD—Investigation, Writing Review, and Editing. Christopher Chaput MD—Conceptualization, Supervision. Matthew Landrum MD—Conceptualization, Writing Review and Editing, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezekial Koslosky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Ethical approval was not required for this case report as it involved the retrospective analysis of de-identified patient data and did not involve any interventions or procedures beyond routine clinical care. Furthermore, the study did not involve any identifiable information, and strict adherence to patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the data collection and reporting process. Thus, no formal ethical approval was sought or obtained for this case report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koslosky, E., Oshoba, S., Armstrong, C. et al. Navigating the complexity of spinal cord injuries with retained foreign bodies and the diagnostic challenge of lead toxicity—a case report. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 10, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00640-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00640-7

Search

Quick links