Abstract
The mechanical properties of unidirectional carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced polyamide 6 (PA6) composites subjected to transverse tension were studied in terms of the structure of the PA6 matrix among the CFs. Two types of CFs with different surface profiles (one smooth and one rough) were used as reinforcements in this study. The surface profile of the CFs had no effect on the tensile strength or Young’s modulus of the composites, whereas the surface profile influenced the strain at break of the composites. According to the results of X-ray diffraction analyses, the crystalline structure of the PA6 matrix in the composites was not substantially influenced by the type of CF. Polarized micrographs of the composites revealed that the birefringence of the PA6 matrix at the interface of the CFs with rough surfaces was remarkably higher than that of the matrix away from the fibers (i.e., in the bulk region). The difference in the local crystalline structure of the PA6 matrix among the CFs can affect the mechanical behavior of the unidirectional PA6/CF composites under transverse tension.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Talreja R, Singh CV. Damage and Failure of Composite Materials. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
Chohan V, Galiotis C. Effects of interface, volume fraction and geometry on stress redistribution in polymer composites under tension. Compos Sci Technol. 1997;57:1089–101.
Hayes SA, Lane R, Jones FR. Fibre/matrix stress transfer through a discrete interphase. Part 1: single-fiber model composites. Compos A. 2001;32:379–89.
Gao SL, Mäder E. Characterisation of interphase nanoscale property variations in glass fiber reinforced polypropylene and epoxy resin composites. Compos A. 2002;33:559–76.
Wang XQ, Zhang JF, Wang ZQ, Zhou S, Sun XY. Effects of interphase properties in unidirectional fiber reinforced composite materials. Mater Des. 2011;32:3486–92.
González C, LLorca J. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymers under transverse compression: microscopic mechanisms and modeling. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67:2795–806.
Yang L, Yan Y, Liu YJ, Ran ZG. Microscopic failure mechanisms of fiber-reinforced polymer composites under transverse tension and compression. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72:1818–25.
Liu BY, Liu Z, Wang XJ, Zhang G, Long SR, Yang J. Interfacial shear strength of carbon fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide measured by the microbond test. Polym Test. 2013;32:724–30.
Liu WB, Zhang S, Hao LF, Jiao WC, Yang F, Li XF, et al. Interfacial shear strength in carbon fiber-reinforced poly(phthalazinone ether ketone) composites. Polym Composite. 2013;34:1921–6.
Thomason JL, Yang L. Temperature dependence of the interfacial shear strength in glass-fiber polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71:1600–5.
Ning NY, Fu SR, Zhang W, Chen F, Wang K, Deng H, et al. Realizing the enhancement of interfacial interaction in semicrystalline polymer/filler composites via interfacial crystallization. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37:1425–55.
Sihn S, Kim RY, Kawabe K, Tsai SW. Experimental studies of thin-ply laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67:996–1008.
Kawabe K. International Patent 2010. Wo 2010/137525 Al.
Kang SK, Lee DB, Choi NS. Fiber/epoxy interfacial shear strength measured by the microdroplet test. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:245–51.
Choi NS, Park JE. Fiber/matrix interfacial shear strength measured by a quasi-disk microbond specimen. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:1615–22.
Illers KH. Polymorphie, kristallinität und Schmelzwärme von poly(ε‐caprolactam), 2. Kalorimetrische Untersuchungen. Makromol Chem. 1978;179:497–507.
Irisawa T, Inagaki R, Iida J, Iwamura R, Ujihara K, Kobayashi S, et al. The influence of oxygen containing functional groups on carbon fibers for mechanical properties and recyclability of CFRTPs made with in-situ polymerizable polyamide 6. Compos A. 2018;112:91–99.
Olympus Mircroscopy Resouce Center. Michel-Levy Birefriengence chart. 2019. https://www.olympus-lifescience.com/ja/microscope-resource/primer/java/polarizedlight/michellevy/. Accessed 26 Dec 2019.
Vautard F, Fioux P, Vidal L, Stiffer F, Roucoules V, Schultz J, et al. Use of plasma polymerization to improve adhesion strength in carbon fiber composites cured by electron beam. ACS Appl Mater Inter. 2014;6:1662–74.
Sang L, Wang YK, Chen GY, Liang JC, Wei ZY. A comparative study of the crystalline structure and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/polyamide 6 composites enhanced with/without silane treatment. RSC Adv. 2016;6:107739–47.
Millot C, Fillot LA, Lame O, Sotta P, Seguela R. Assessment of polyamide-6 crystallinity by DSC. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2015;122:307–14.
Liang JC, Xu YQ, Wei ZY, Song P, Chen GY, Zhang WX. Mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behaviors of carbon fiber-reinforced PA6 composites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2014;115:209–18.
Yan XL, Imai Y, Shimamoto D, Hotta Y. Relationship study between crystal structure and thermal/mechanical properties of polyamide 6 reinforced and unreinforced by carbon fiber from macro and local view. Polymer. 2014;55:6186–94.
Park SJ, Seo MK, Lee YS. Surface characteristics of fluorine-modified PAN-based carbon fibers. Carbon. 2003;41:723–30.
Ho KKC, Lee AF, Bismarck A. Fluorination of carbon fibers in atmospheric plasma. Carbon. 2007;45:775–84.
Kobayashi D, Hsieh YT, Takahara A. Interphase structure of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 revealed by microbeam X-ray diffraction with synchrotron radiation. Polymer. 2016;89:154–8.
Cain Y, Petermann J, Wittich H. Transcrystallization in fiber-reinforced isotactic polypropylene composites in a temperature gradient. J Appl Polym Sci. 1997;65:67–75.
Zhang S, Xu D, Yang W, Tang P, Bin Y. Temperature dependence of morphology of transcrystalline at the interface of carbon fiber and poly (l-lactic acid) composite under a temperature gradient stage. Macromol Symp. 2016;365:10–16.
Thomason JL, Van Rooyen AA. Transcrystallized interphase in thermoplastic composites. Part II Influence of interfacial stress, cooling rate, fibre properties and polymer molecular weight. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:897–907.
Yang S, Yu H, Lei F, Li J, Guo S, Wu H, et al. Formation mechanism and morphology of β‑transcrystallinity of polypropylene induced by two-dimensional layered interface. Macromolecules. 2015;48:3965–73.
Gao Y, Xie M, Liu L, Li J, Kuang J, Ma W, et al. Effect of supra-molecular microstructures on the adhesion of SWCNT fiber/iPP interface. Polymer. 2013;54:456–63.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant No. JP18K14001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Uematsu, H., Kurita, D., Nakakubo, S. et al. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 composites under transverse tension and the structure of polyamide 6 among carbon fibers. Polym J 52, 1195–1201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0371-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-020-0371-4