Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Germline pathogenic variants in metaplastic breast cancer patients and the emerging role of the BRCA1 gene

A Comment to this article was published on 17 August 2023

Abstract

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare, aggressive breast cancer (BC) histotype. Scarce information is available about MpBC genetic predisposition. Previous studies, mainly consisting of case reports, retrospective reviews and others on target therapies, pointed to a possible involvement of the BRCA1 gene in increasing MpBC risk, without ever confirming it. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed all BC patients counseled at our Institute for genetic testing of at least BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) genes and we found that 23 (23/5226 = 0.4%) were affected by MpBC. About 65% (15/23) of MpBC patients harbored a germline pathogenic variant (PV): 13 in BRCA1 (86.7%), including two patients who received genetic testing for known familial PV, one in TP53 (6.7%), and one in MLH1 (6.7%). We observed a statistically different frequency of MpBC in patients who carried a PV in the BRCA genes (13/1114 = 1.2%) vs. all other BC patients (10/4112 = 0.2%) (p = 0.0002). BRCA carriers proved to have an increased risk of developing MpBC compared to all other BC patients who were tested for BRCA genes (OR = 4.47; 95% CI: 1.95–10.23). Notably, MpBCs were diagnosed in 2.1% (13/610) of BRCA1 carriers. No MpBCs were observed in BRCA2 carriers (0/498 = 0%), revealing a statistically significant difference between the prevalence of MpBCs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (p = 0.0015). Our results confirmed that BRCA1 is involved in MpBC predisposition. Further studies on unselected patients are needed to elucidate the authentic role of BRCA1 and to explore the possible implication of other genes in MpBC predisposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Distribution of unique germline BRCA1 PVs identified in MpBC patients (modified from BRCA Exchange https://brcaexchange.org/).

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). WHO classification of tumours of the breast, 4th edition. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2012.

  2. Reddy TP, Rosato RR, Li X, Moulder S, Piwnica-Worms H, Chang JC. A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22:121.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McCart Reed AE, Kalaw E, Nones K, Bettington M, Lim M, Bennett J, et al. Phenotypic and molecular dissection of metaplastic breast cancer and the prognostic implications. J Pathol. 2019;247:214–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1346–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2105–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Corso G, Frassoni S, Girardi A, De Camilli E, Montagna E, Intra M, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic considerations. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:61–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corso G, D’Ecclesiis O, Magnoni F, Mazzotta E, Conforti F, Veronesi P, et al. Metaplastic breast cancers and triple-negative breast cancers of no special type: are they prognostically different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022;31:459–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hahnen E, Hauke J, Engel C, Neidhardt G, Rhiem K, Schmutzlera RK. Germline mutations in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12:15–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Mavaddat N, Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J, González-Neira A, Keeman R, et al. Pathology of tumors associated with pathogenic germline variants in 9 breast cancer susceptibility genes. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:e216744.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2023). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (version 1.2023). Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf.

  11. Chen H, Wu J, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Li X, Liu S, et al. Association between BRCA status and triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Pharm. 2018;9:909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Packwood K, Martland G, Sommerlad M, Shaw E, Moutasim K, Thomas G, et al. Breast cancer in patients with germline TP53 pathogenic variants have typical tumour characteristics: the Cohort study of TP53 carrier early onset breast cancer (COPE study). J Pathol Clin Res. 2019;5:189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Frebourg T, Bajalica Lagercrantz S, Oliveira C, Magenheim R, Evans DG. European Reference Network GENTURIS. Guidelines for the Li-Fraumeni and heritable TP53-related cancer syndromes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:1379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Reis-Filho JS, Lakhani SR, Gobbi H, Sneige N. Metaplastic carcinomas. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). WHO Classification of tumours of the breast. 4th edn. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2012. p. 48–52.

  15. Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, Foulkes WD, Genuardi M, Greenblatt MS, et al. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1282–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rashid MU, Shah MA, Azhar R, Syed AA, Amin A, Hamann U. A deleterious BRCA1 mutation in a young Pakistani woman with metaplastic breast carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2011;207:583–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noël JC, Buxant F, Engohan-Aloghe C. Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast–A case report with a BRCA1 germline mutation. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:511–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Breuer A, Kandel M, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Sutter C, Schwaab E, Lück HJ, et al. BRCA1 germline mutation in a woman with metaplastic squamous cell breast cancer. Onkologie. 2007;30:316–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamashita M, Kamei Y, Murakami A, Ozaki E, Okujima K, Takemoto K, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast and BRCA1 germline mutation: a case report and review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021;19:3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vohra LM, Ali D, Hashmi SA, Angez M. Breast cancer in a teenage girl with BRCA mutation: a case report from a low middle-income country. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;98:107513.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghilli M, Mariniello DM, Fanelli G, Cascione F, Fontana A, Cristaudo A, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the breast: an aggressive subtype of metaplastic cancer. report of a rare case in a young BRCA-1 mutated woman. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:e31–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suspitsin EN, Sokolenko AP, Voskresenskiy DA, Ivantsov AO, Shelehova KV, Klimashevskiy VF, et al. Mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) of the breast in BRCA1 carrier. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bell K, Hodgson N, Levine M, Sadikovic B, Zbuk K. Double heterozygosity for germline mutations in BRCA1 and p53 in a woman with early onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146:447–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamad L, Khoury T, Vona K, Nestico J, Opyrchal M, Salerno KE. A case of metaplastic breast cancer with prolonged response to single agent liposomal doxorubicin. Cureus. 2016;8:e454.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong W, Brogi E, Reis-Filho JS, Plitas G, Robson M, Norton L, et al. Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Hilli Z, Choong G, Keeney MG, Visscher DW, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176:709–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Litton JK, Scoggins ME, Hess KR, Adrada BE, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, et al. Neoadjuvant talazoparib for patients with operable breast cancer with a germline BRCA pathogenic variant. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:388–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moukarzel LA, Ferrando L, Da Cruz Paula A, Brown DN, Geyer FC, Pareja F, et al. The genetic landscape of metaplastic breast cancers and uterine carcinosarcomas. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:1024–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Malas S, Krawitz HE, Sur RK, Uijs RR, Nayler SJ, Levin CV. Von recklinghausen’s disease associated with a primary malignant schwannoma of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:273–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura M, Tangoku A, Kusanagi H, Oka M, Suzuki T. Breast cancer associated with Recklinghausen’s disease: report of a case. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1998;67:3–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chaudhry US, Yang L, Askeland RW, Fajardo LL. Metaplastic breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Natsiopoulos I, Chatzichristou A, Stratis I, Skordalaki A, Makrantonakis N. Metaplastic breast carcinoma in a patient with Von Recklinghausen’s disease. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7:573–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hegyi L, Thway K, Newton R, Osin P, Nerurkar A, Hayes AJ, et al. Malignant myoepithelioma arising in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast and coincident multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:653–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vivas APM, Bomfin LE, Pinto CAL, Nicolau UR, Alves FA. Oral metastasis of metaplastic breast carcinoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis 1. Case Rep. Oncol Med. 2014;2014:719061.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nogimori M, Yokota K, Sawada M, Matsumoto T, Kono M, Akiyama M. Spindle cell carcinoma of the breast in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur J Dermatol. 2014;24:397–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Suarez-Kelly LP, Akagi K, Reeser JW, Samorodnitsky E, Reeder M, Smith A, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and somatic loss of heterozygosity. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018;4:a002352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodríguez-Fernández V, Cameselle-Cortizo L, Valdés-Pons J, De Castro-Parga GJ, Figueiredo-Alonso E, Novo-Domínguez A, et al. New criteria to select patients with breast cancer to perform germline BRCA1/2 testing. Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2021;7:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Idos G, Valle L. Lynch Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, et al. eds. GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA). Seattle: University of Washington; 2004. 1993–2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1211/.

  40. Lynch HT, Snyder CL, Shaw TG, Heinen CD, Hitchins MP. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:181–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dominguez-Valentin M, Sampson JR, Seppälä TT, Ten Broeke SW, Plazzer JP, Nakken S, et al. Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020;22:15–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tolva G, Gandini S, Marabelli M, Calvello M, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Bertario L, et al. Response to Dominguez-Valentin M et al. 2019: Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020;22:811–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rebbeck TR, Friebel TM, Friedman E, Hamann U, Huo D, Kwong A, et al. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:593–620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shimelis H, LaDuca H, Hu C, Hart SN, Na J, Thomas A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer risk genes identified by multigene hereditary cancer panel testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:855–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Corso G, Criscitiello C, Nicosia L, Pesapane F, Vicini E, Magnoni F, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2023;32:348–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This manuscript was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente 5 × 1000 funds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept and design: GC, MC, MM, AGG, and BB; Supervisor board: AGG, BB, and PV; Iconography and graphic design: MM, MR, IF, and SM; Acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data: EM, LB, EGR, AG, AMDS, FM; Statistical analyses: SG; Drafting of the manuscript: MM, MC, and GC with input of all authors; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: AGG, BB, MB, and PV; Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Marabelli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the European Institute of Oncology (UID 0833, date of approval 23/05/2018). Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corso, G., Marabelli, M., Calvello, M. et al. Germline pathogenic variants in metaplastic breast cancer patients and the emerging role of the BRCA1 gene. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 1275–1282 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01429-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01429-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links