Abstract
Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare, aggressive breast cancer (BC) histotype. Scarce information is available about MpBC genetic predisposition. Previous studies, mainly consisting of case reports, retrospective reviews and others on target therapies, pointed to a possible involvement of the BRCA1 gene in increasing MpBC risk, without ever confirming it. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed all BC patients counseled at our Institute for genetic testing of at least BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) genes and we found that 23 (23/5226 = 0.4%) were affected by MpBC. About 65% (15/23) of MpBC patients harbored a germline pathogenic variant (PV): 13 in BRCA1 (86.7%), including two patients who received genetic testing for known familial PV, one in TP53 (6.7%), and one in MLH1 (6.7%). We observed a statistically different frequency of MpBC in patients who carried a PV in the BRCA genes (13/1114 = 1.2%) vs. all other BC patients (10/4112 = 0.2%) (p = 0.0002). BRCA carriers proved to have an increased risk of developing MpBC compared to all other BC patients who were tested for BRCA genes (OR = 4.47; 95% CI: 1.95–10.23). Notably, MpBCs were diagnosed in 2.1% (13/610) of BRCA1 carriers. No MpBCs were observed in BRCA2 carriers (0/498 = 0%), revealing a statistically significant difference between the prevalence of MpBCs in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (p = 0.0015). Our results confirmed that BRCA1 is involved in MpBC predisposition. Further studies on unselected patients are needed to elucidate the authentic role of BRCA1 and to explore the possible implication of other genes in MpBC predisposition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). WHO classification of tumours of the breast, 4th edition. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2012.
Reddy TP, Rosato RR, Li X, Moulder S, Piwnica-Worms H, Chang JC. A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22:121.
McCart Reed AE, Kalaw E, Nones K, Bettington M, Lim M, Bennett J, et al. Phenotypic and molecular dissection of metaplastic breast cancer and the prognostic implications. J Pathol. 2019;247:214–27.
Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1346–66.
Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2105–22.
Corso G, Frassoni S, Girardi A, De Camilli E, Montagna E, Intra M, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic considerations. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:61–70.
Corso G, D’Ecclesiis O, Magnoni F, Mazzotta E, Conforti F, Veronesi P, et al. Metaplastic breast cancers and triple-negative breast cancers of no special type: are they prognostically different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022;31:459–66.
Hahnen E, Hauke J, Engel C, Neidhardt G, Rhiem K, Schmutzlera RK. Germline mutations in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12:15–9.
Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Mavaddat N, Dorling L, Carvalho S, Allen J, González-Neira A, Keeman R, et al. Pathology of tumors associated with pathogenic germline variants in 9 breast cancer susceptibility genes. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:e216744.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2023). Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (version 1.2023). Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf.
Chen H, Wu J, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Li X, Liu S, et al. Association between BRCA status and triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Front Pharm. 2018;9:909.
Packwood K, Martland G, Sommerlad M, Shaw E, Moutasim K, Thomas G, et al. Breast cancer in patients with germline TP53 pathogenic variants have typical tumour characteristics: the Cohort study of TP53 carrier early onset breast cancer (COPE study). J Pathol Clin Res. 2019;5:189–98.
Frebourg T, Bajalica Lagercrantz S, Oliveira C, Magenheim R, Evans DG. European Reference Network GENTURIS. Guidelines for the Li-Fraumeni and heritable TP53-related cancer syndromes. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:1379–86.
Reis-Filho JS, Lakhani SR, Gobbi H, Sneige N. Metaplastic carcinomas. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (eds). WHO Classification of tumours of the breast. 4th edn. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2012. p. 48–52.
Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D, Foulkes WD, Genuardi M, Greenblatt MS, et al. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1282–91.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.
Rashid MU, Shah MA, Azhar R, Syed AA, Amin A, Hamann U. A deleterious BRCA1 mutation in a young Pakistani woman with metaplastic breast carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2011;207:583–6.
Noël JC, Buxant F, Engohan-Aloghe C. Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast–A case report with a BRCA1 germline mutation. Pathol Res Pract. 2010;206:511–3.
Breuer A, Kandel M, Fisseler-Eckhoff A, Sutter C, Schwaab E, Lück HJ, et al. BRCA1 germline mutation in a woman with metaplastic squamous cell breast cancer. Onkologie. 2007;30:316–8.
Yamashita M, Kamei Y, Murakami A, Ozaki E, Okujima K, Takemoto K, et al. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast and BRCA1 germline mutation: a case report and review. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2021;19:3.
Vohra LM, Ali D, Hashmi SA, Angez M. Breast cancer in a teenage girl with BRCA mutation: a case report from a low middle-income country. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022;98:107513.
Ghilli M, Mariniello DM, Fanelli G, Cascione F, Fontana A, Cristaudo A, et al. Carcinosarcoma of the breast: an aggressive subtype of metaplastic cancer. report of a rare case in a young BRCA-1 mutated woman. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:e31–5.
Suspitsin EN, Sokolenko AP, Voskresenskiy DA, Ivantsov AO, Shelehova KV, Klimashevskiy VF, et al. Mixed epithelial/mesenchymal metaplastic carcinoma (carcinosarcoma) of the breast in BRCA1 carrier. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:137–40.
Bell K, Hodgson N, Levine M, Sadikovic B, Zbuk K. Double heterozygosity for germline mutations in BRCA1 and p53 in a woman with early onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146:447–50.
Hamad L, Khoury T, Vona K, Nestico J, Opyrchal M, Salerno KE. A case of metaplastic breast cancer with prolonged response to single agent liposomal doxorubicin. Cureus. 2016;8:e454.
Wong W, Brogi E, Reis-Filho JS, Plitas G, Robson M, Norton L, et al. Poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in metaplastic breast carcinoma. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:96.
Al-Hilli Z, Choong G, Keeney MG, Visscher DW, Ingle JN, Goetz MP, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176:709–16.
Litton JK, Scoggins ME, Hess KR, Adrada BE, Murthy RK, Damodaran S, et al. Neoadjuvant talazoparib for patients with operable breast cancer with a germline BRCA pathogenic variant. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:388–94.
Moukarzel LA, Ferrando L, Da Cruz Paula A, Brown DN, Geyer FC, Pareja F, et al. The genetic landscape of metaplastic breast cancers and uterine carcinosarcomas. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:1024–39.
Malas S, Krawitz HE, Sur RK, Uijs RR, Nayler SJ, Levin CV. Von recklinghausen’s disease associated with a primary malignant schwannoma of the breast. J Surg Oncol. 1995;59:273–5.
Nakamura M, Tangoku A, Kusanagi H, Oka M, Suzuki T. Breast cancer associated with Recklinghausen’s disease: report of a case. Nihon Geka Hokan. 1998;67:3–9.
Chaudhry US, Yang L, Askeland RW, Fajardo LL. Metaplastic breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2015;5:17.
Natsiopoulos I, Chatzichristou A, Stratis I, Skordalaki A, Makrantonakis N. Metaplastic breast carcinoma in a patient with Von Recklinghausen’s disease. Clin Breast Cancer. 2007;7:573–5.
Hegyi L, Thway K, Newton R, Osin P, Nerurkar A, Hayes AJ, et al. Malignant myoepithelioma arising in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast and coincident multiple gastrointestinal stromal tumours in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62:653–5.
Vivas APM, Bomfin LE, Pinto CAL, Nicolau UR, Alves FA. Oral metastasis of metaplastic breast carcinoma in a patient with neurofibromatosis 1. Case Rep. Oncol Med. 2014;2014:719061.
Nogimori M, Yokota K, Sawada M, Matsumoto T, Kono M, Akiyama M. Spindle cell carcinoma of the breast in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eur J Dermatol. 2014;24:397–8.
Suarez-Kelly LP, Akagi K, Reeser JW, Samorodnitsky E, Reeder M, Smith A, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1 and somatic loss of heterozygosity. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2018;4:a002352.
Rodríguez-Fernández V, Cameselle-Cortizo L, Valdés-Pons J, De Castro-Parga GJ, Figueiredo-Alonso E, Novo-Domínguez A, et al. New criteria to select patients with breast cancer to perform germline BRCA1/2 testing. Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2021;7:1–13.
Idos G, Valle L. Lynch Syndrome. In: Adam MP, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, et al. eds. GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA). Seattle: University of Washington; 2004. 1993–2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1211/.
Lynch HT, Snyder CL, Shaw TG, Heinen CD, Hitchins MP. Milestones of Lynch syndrome: 1895–2015. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:181–94.
Dominguez-Valentin M, Sampson JR, Seppälä TT, Ten Broeke SW, Plazzer JP, Nakken S, et al. Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020;22:15–25.
Tolva G, Gandini S, Marabelli M, Calvello M, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Bertario L, et al. Response to Dominguez-Valentin M et al. 2019: Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database. Genet Med. 2020;22:811–2.
Rebbeck TR, Friebel TM, Friedman E, Hamann U, Huo D, Kwong A, et al. Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:593–620.
Shimelis H, LaDuca H, Hu C, Hart SN, Na J, Thomas A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer risk genes identified by multigene hereditary cancer panel testing. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:855–62.
Corso G, Criscitiello C, Nicosia L, Pesapane F, Vicini E, Magnoni F, et al. Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2023;32:348–63.
Funding
This manuscript was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente 5 × 1000 funds.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Concept and design: GC, MC, MM, AGG, and BB; Supervisor board: AGG, BB, and PV; Iconography and graphic design: MM, MR, IF, and SM; Acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data: EM, LB, EGR, AG, AMDS, FM; Statistical analyses: SG; Drafting of the manuscript: MM, MC, and GC with input of all authors; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: AGG, BB, MB, and PV; Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the European Institute of Oncology (UID 0833, date of approval 23/05/2018). Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Corso, G., Marabelli, M., Calvello, M. et al. Germline pathogenic variants in metaplastic breast cancer patients and the emerging role of the BRCA1 gene. Eur J Hum Genet 31, 1275–1282 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01429-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-023-01429-2
This article is cited by
-
Metaplastic breast cancer and BRCA1: first strong evidence of a link
European Journal of Human Genetics (2023)
-
Deep phenotyping and population-level data can help resolve genomic variants
European Journal of Human Genetics (2023)