Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Optical coherence tomographic findings of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the relationship between the shape of the optic nerve head (ONH) margin detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the clinical characteristics of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis (PMRS).

Methods

The medical record of patients with a PMRS in a glaucomatous eye were reviewed. The eyes were placed into two groups determined by the shape of the ONH margin in the OCT images; eyes with an externally oblique ONH margin (Group 1) and eyes with an internally oblique ONH margin (Group 2). We compared the clinical characteristics of the PMRS of these two groups.

Results

We studied 31 eyes of 29 patients with PMRS and glaucoma with 24 eyes in Group 1 and 7 eyes in Group 2. The optic nerve fibre layer schisis on the lamina cribrosa (LC), beta zone, and gamma zone, and found that the LC defects were detected significantly more frequently in Group 1 than in Group 2 eyes (P < 0.05). A retinal nerve fibre schisis was observed around the ONH significantly more frequently in Group 2 than in Group 1 eyes (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The cases of glaucoma-associated PMRS could be classified into two groups according to the obliquity of the ONH. They had differences in the findings of OCT and FA. The possibility that the mechanism of PMRS development is different in both groups is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Representative Group 1 case with a papillomacular retinoschisis (PMRS).
Fig. 2: Representative case with PMRS in a Group 2 eye.
Fig. 3: Vitreous tractions in eyes with an externally and an internally oblique margin of the ONH.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author (TI) on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hirakata A, Okada AA, Hida T. Long-term results of vitrectomy without laser treatment for macular detachment associated with an optic disc pit. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1430–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalogeropoulos D, Ch'ng SW, Lee R, Elaraoud I, Purohit M, Felicida V. Optic disc pit maculopathy: a review. asia pac. J Ophthalmol (Philos). 2019;8:247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujimoto S, Kokame GT, Ryan EH, Johnson W, Hirakata A, Shirriff A. Macular retinoschisis from optic disc without a visible optic pit or advanced glaucomatous cupping (No Optic Pit Retinoschisis [NOPIR]). Ophthalmol Retina. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.

  4. Hollander DA, Barricks ME, Duncan JL, Irvine AR. Macular schisis detachment associated with angle-closure glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:270–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zumbro DS, Jampol LM, Folk JC, Olivier MM, Anderson-Nelson S. Macular schisis and detachment associated with presumed acquired enlarged optic nerve head cups. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:70–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao M, Li X. Macular retinoschisis associated with normal tension glaucoma. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:1255–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Orazbekov L, Yasukawa T, Hirano Y, Ogura S, Usui H, Nozaki M. Vitrectomy without gas tamponade for macular retinoschisis associated with normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retin. 2015;46:107–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikawa K, Fukui T, Nakao S, Shiose S, Sonoda KH. Vitrectomy with peripapillary internal limiting membrane peeling for macular retinoschisis associated with normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;18:100663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Moreno-Lopez M, Gonzalez-Lopez JJ, Jarrin E, Bertrand J. Retinoschisis and macular detachment associated with acquired enlarged optic disc cup. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:433–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ornek N, Buyuktortop N, Ornek K. Peripapillary and macular retinoschisis in a patient with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. BMJ Case Rep. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009469.

  11. Takashina S, Saito W, Noda K, Katai M, Ishida S. Membrane tissue on the optic disc may cause macular schisis associated with a glaucomatous optic disc without optic disc pits. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:883–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshikawa T, Yamanaka C, Kinoshita T, Morikawa S, Ogata N. Macular retinoschisis in eyes with glaucomatous optic neuropathy: vitrectomy and natural course. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256:281–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Inoue M, Itoh Y, Rii T, Kita Y, Hirota K, Kunita D, et al. Spontaneous resolution of peripapillary retinoschisis associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:e317–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Inoue M, Itoh Y, Rii T, Kita Y, Hirota K, Kunita D, et al. Macular retinoschisis associated with glaucomatous optic neuropathy in eyes with normal intraocular pressure. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253:1447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshitake T, Nakanishi H, Setoguchi Y, Kuroda K, Amemiya K, Taniguchi M, et al. Bilateral papillomacular retinoschisis and macular detachment accompanied by focal lamina cribrosa defect in glaucomatous eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2014;58:435–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts JD, Hunter A, Mega J, Cesaro T, Greenberg PB. Case report: glaucoma-associated peripapillary retinoschisis with corresponding lamina cribrosa defect. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grewal DS, Merlau DJ, Giri P, Munk MR, Fawzi AA, Jampol LM, et al. Peripapillary retinal splitting visualized on OCT in glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0182816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Haruta M, Handa S, Yoshida S. Papillomacular retinoschisis associated with glaucoma: response to topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;19:100741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lampert PW, Vogel MH, Zimmerman LE. Pathology of the optic nerve in experimental acute glaucoma. electron microscopic studies. Investig Ophthalmol. 1968;7:199–213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JH, Park HY, Baek J, Lee WK. Alterations of the lamina cribrosa are associated with peripapillary retinoschisis in glaucoma and pachychoroid spectrum disease. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2066–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abe RY, Gracitelli CP, Diniz-Filho A, Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA. Lamina cribrosa in glaucoma: diagnosis and monitoring. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015;3:74–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiumehr S, Park SC, Syril D, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, et al. In vivo evaluation of focal lamina cribrosa defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Han JC, Choi JH, Park DY, Lee EJ, Kee C. Border tissue morphology is spatially associated with focal lamina cribrosa defect and deep-layer microvasculature dropout in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;203:89–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strouthidis NG, Yang H, Reynaud JF, Grimm JL, Gardiner SK, Fortune B, et al. Comparison of clinical and spectral domain optical coherence tomography optic disc margin anatomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4709–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Park SC, De Moraes CG, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. In-vivo microstructural anatomy of beta-zone parapapillary atrophy in glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6408–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Han JC, Choi JH, Park DY, Lee EJ, Kee C. Deep optic nerve head morphology is associated with pattern of glaucomatous visual field defect in open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:3842–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park DY, Noh H, Kee C, Han JC. Topographic relationships among deep optic nerve head parameters in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1320–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Choy YJ, Kwun Y, Han JC, Kee C. Comparison of visual field progression between temporally tilted disc and nontilted disc, in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Eye. 2015;29:1308–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi K, Tomidokoro A, Lee KY, Konno S, Saito H, Mayama C, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography of β-zone peripapillary atrophy: influence of myopia and glaucoma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dai Y, Jonas JB, Huang H, Wang M, Sun X. Microstructure of parapapillary atrophy: beta zone and gamma zone. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:2013–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sano M, Hirakata A, Kita Y, Itoh Y, Koto T, Inoue M. Risk factors for failure of resolving optic disc pit maculopathy after primary vitrectomy without laser photocoagulation. J Ophthalmol. 2021;65:786–96.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jain N, Johnson MW. Pathogenesis and treatment of maculopathy associated with cavitary optic disc anomalies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:423–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ohno-Matsui K, Hirakata A, Inoue M, Akiba M, Ishibashi T. Evaluation of congenital optic disc pits and optic disc colobomas by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:7769–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Benarroch EE. Circumventricular organs: receptive and homeostatic functions and clinical implications. Neurology. 2011;77:1198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fortune B. Pulling and tugging on the retina: mechanical impact of glaucoma beyond the optic nerve head. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo L, Normando EM, Nizari S, Lara D, Cordeiro MF. Tracking longitudinal retinal changes in experimental ocular hypertension using the cSLO and spectral domain-OCT. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6504–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Emeritus Duco Hamasaki of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, for the discussions and thorough editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors declare they meet the current ICMJE criteria. TI, YK, MI, MM, KH, TK and MI collected data and analysed the ophthalmological findings. TI and YK analysed statistical findings. YI, YK and AH gave critical suggestions. TI, YK and AH prepared the manuscript. YI proofread the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoka Ishida.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

TI: Personal fees (lecture fees) from Nikon Co., Ltd., and Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. YK: Personal fees (lecture fees) from Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Glaukos, outside the submitted work., YI None. MM: Personal fees (lecture fees) from Novartis Pharma K.K., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and KOWA Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work., KH: None, TK: Research grants from Ellex, and personal fees (lecture fees) from Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Bayer AG, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Novartis Pharma K.K., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., HOYA Co., Ltd., Rohto Nitten Co., Ltd., River field Co., Ltd., and Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AMO., outside the submitted work. MI: Research grants from Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and personal fees (lecture fees) from Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Bayer AG, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Novartis Pharma K.K., HOYA Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AMO Japan Co., Ltd., Logic and design Co., Ltd.,, outside the submitted work. AH: Research grants from Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and personal fees (lecture fees) from Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Bayer AG, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Novartis Pharma K.K., Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd and., Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., HOYA Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Institutional Review Board Statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the Kyorin University School of Medicine (approval number #1627). Informed Consent Statement: The patients received a detailed explanation of the surgical and ophthalmic procedures, and all signed an informed consent form. The patients consented to our review of their medical records and their anonymized use in medical publications. The patient consent for this study was obtained in an opt-out format.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishida, T., Kita, Y., Itoh, Y. et al. Optical coherence tomographic findings of glaucomatous eyes with papillomacular retinoschisis. Eye 38, 266–273 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02671-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-023-02671-0

Search

Quick links