Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The relationship between day-to-day variability in home blood pressure measurement and multiple organ function

A Comment to this article was published on 27 December 2021

Abstract

Blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, it is unclear how BPV is related to various organs. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between BPV and multiple organ functions. A total of three hundred fifteen participants (114 males; mean age: 70 ± 9 years) participated in a community health checkup held in Tarumizu City. Home blood pressure (BP) was measured using a HEM-9700T (OMRON Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan). Day-to-day BPV was evaluated by the coefficient of variation (CV) of home BP measured in the morning for one month. N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) and high-sensitivity (hs-)troponin T were measured as cardiac biomarkers. Liver stiffness and renal function were evaluated using the Fibrous-4 (Fib4) index and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), respectively. NT-pro BNP and hs-troponin T were divided by the median value. Fib4 index greater than 2.67 and eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were defined as high Fib4 index and low eGFR, respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the CV of systolic BP was significantly associated with high NT-pro BNP, high Fib 4 index, and low eGFR, but not with high hs-troponin T. In contrast, the CV of diastolic BP was not associated with low eGFR, and the other three biomarkers had the same results as systolic BP. In conclusion, day-to-day BPV of systolic BP is independently associated with NT-pro BNP, eGFR, and Fib4 index, but not with hs-troponin T. In contrast, diastolic BPV was not found to be associated with eGFR.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fujiyoshi A, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Murakami Y, Nagasawa SY, Okamura T, et al. Blood pressure categories and long-term risk of cardiovascular disease according to age group in Japanese men and women. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:947–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanizaki Y, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Iwamoto H, Nakayama K, Shinohara N, et al. Incidence and risk factors for subtypes of cerebral infarction in a general population: the Hisayama study. Stroke. 2000;31:2616–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takashima N, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Okamura T, Murakami Y, Fujiyoshi A, et al. Long-term risk of BP values above normal for cardiovascular mortality: a 24-year observation of Japanese aged 30 to 92 years. J Hypertens. 2012;30:2299–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Soliman EZ, Ambrosius WT, Cushman WC, Zhang ZM, Bates JT, Neyra JA, et al. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Circulation. 2017;136:440–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ninomiya T, Ohara T, Hirakawa Y, Yoshida D, Doi Y, Hata J, et al. Midlife and late-life blood pressure and dementia in Japanese elderly: the Hisayama study. Hypertension. 2011;58:22–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tozawa M, Iseki K, Iseki C, Kinjo K, Ikemiya Y, Takishita S. Blood pressure predicts risk of developing end-stage renal disease in men and women. Hypertension. 2003;41:1341–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamagata K, Ishida K, Sairenchi T, Takahashi H, Ohba S, Shiigai T, et al. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a community-based population: a 10-year follow-up study. Kidney Int. 2007;7:159–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010;375:895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kostis JB, Sedjro JE, Cabrera J, Cosgrove NM, Pantazopoulos JS, Kostis WJ, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and cardiovascular death in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. J Clin Hypertens. 2014;16:34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue Y, Kuwahara K, Hu H, Yamamoto S, Nakagawa T, Honda T, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular events among the working-age population in Japan: findings from the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study. Hypertens Res. 2021;44:1017–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabayan B, Wijsman LW, Foster-Dingley JC, Stott DJ, Ford I, Buckley BM, et al. Association of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure with cognitive function in old age: prospective cohort study. Br Med J. 2013;347:f4600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Asayama K, Hara A, Obara T, et al. Day-by-day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis: the Ohasama study. Hypertension. 2008;52:1045–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Godai K, Kabayama M, Gondo Y, Yasumoto S, Sekiguchi T, Noma T, et al. Day-to-day blood pressure variability is associated with lower cognitive performance among the Japanese community-dwelling oldest-old population: the SONIC study. Hypertens Res. 2020;43:404–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oishi E, Ohara T, Sakata S, Fukuhara M, Hata J, Yoshida D, et al. Day-to-day blood pressure variability and risk of dementia in a general Japanese elderly population: the Hisayama study. Circulation. 2017;136:516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Satoh M, Hosaka M, Asayama K, Kikuya M, Inoue R, Metoki H, et al. Association between N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and day-to-day blood pressure and heart rate variability in a general population: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens. 2015;33:1536–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishimura M, Kato Y, Tanaka T, Todo R, Tone A, Yamada K, et al. Significance of estimating the glomerular filtration rate for the management of hypertension in type 2 diabetes with microalbuminuria. Hypertens Res. 2013;36:705–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parati G, Torlasco C, Pengo M, Bilo G, Ochoa JE. Blood pressure variability: its relevance for cardiovascular homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases. Hypertens Res. 2020;43:609–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mena L, Pintos S, Queipo NV, Aizpúrua JA, Maestre G, Sulbarán T. A reliable index for the prognostic significance of blood pressure variability. J Hypertens. 2005;23:505–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, et al. Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:469–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43:1317–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Suzuki D, Hoshide S, Kario K. Associations between day-by-day home blood pressure variability and renal function and albuminuria in patients with and without diabetes. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33:860–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawai T, Ohishi M, Kamide K, Onishi M, Takeya Y, Tatara Y, et al. The impact of visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure on renal function. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:239–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kawai T, Ohishi M, Kamide K, Nakama C, Onishi M, Ito N, et al. Differences between daytime and nighttime blood pressure variability regarding systemic atherosclerotic change and renal function. Hypertens Res. 2013;36:232–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parati G, Ochoa JE, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwasaki Y, Shiina K, Matsumoto C, Nakano H, Fujii M, Yamashina A, et al. Correlation of the fatty liver index with the pathophysiological abnormalities associated with cardiovascular risk markers in Japanese men without any history of cardiovascular disease: comparison with the Fibrosis-4 score. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021;28:524–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cobbina E, Akhlaghi F. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)—pathogenesis, classification, and effect on drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Drug Metab Rev. 2017;49:197–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Amir M, Yu M, He P, Srinivasan S. Hepatic autonomic nervous system and neurotrophic factors regulate the pathogenesis and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Med. 2020;7:62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ishiyama Y, Hoshide S, Kanegae H, Kario K. Increased arterial stiffness amplifies the association between home blood pressure variability and cardiac overload: the J-HOP study. Hypertension. 2020;75:1600–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sato Y, Kita T, Takatsu Y, Kimura T. Biochemical markers of myocyte injury in heart failure. Heart. 2004;90:1110–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shionimya H, Koyama S, Tanada Y, Takahashi N, Fujiwara H, Takatsu Y, et al. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and ejection fraction correlate independently with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-T concentrations in stable heart failure. J Cardiol. 2015;65:526–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kimura K, Tomiyama H, Matsumoto C, Odaira M, Shiina K, Nagata M, et al. Correlations of arterial stiffness/central hemodynamics with serum cardiac troponin T and natriuretic peptide levels in a middle-aged male worksite cohort. J Cardiol. 2015;66:135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hansen TW, Thijs L, Li Y, Boggia J, Kikuya M, Björklund-Bodegård K, et al. Prognostic value of reading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 h in 8938 subjects from 11 populations. Hypertension. 2010;55:1049–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bilo G, Dolan E, O’Brien E, Facchetti R, Soranna D, Zambon A, et al. The impact of systolic and diastolic blood pressure variability on mortality is age-dependent: data from the Dublin Outcome Study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27:355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Chikashi Yamaguchi and Kohko Horinouchi of the MeRAS Corporation for their help in obtaining BP data measured by the participants. This study was conducted by OMRON HEALTHCARE Co. Ltd. in cooperation with the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Hypertension, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University. The running cost of this observational study was funded by OMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuro Kubozono.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

TK, AY, and MO received research support from Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd. MK, SF, and KM are employees of OMRON Healthcare Co., Ltd.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kubozono, T., Akasaki, Y., Kawasoe, S. et al. The relationship between day-to-day variability in home blood pressure measurement and multiple organ function. Hypertens Res 45, 474–482 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00818-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-021-00818-8

Keywords

Search

Quick links