Conversational agents (CAs) are computer programs designed to engage in human-like conversations with users. They are increasingly used in digital health applications, for example medical history taking. CAs have potential to facilitate health-care processes when designed carefully, considering quality aspects and are integrated into health-care processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 1 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $99.00 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Jovanović, M., Baez, M. & Casati, F. Chatbots as conversational healthcare services. IEEE Internet Comput. 25, 44–51 (2021).
Denecke, K. & May, R. Developing a technical-oriented taxonomy to define archetypes of conversational agents in health care: literature review and cluster analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 25, e41583 (2023).
Durden, E. et al. Changes in stress, burnout, and resilience associated with an 8-week intervention with relational agent “Woebot”. Internet Interv. 33, 100637 (2023).
Jungmann, S. M., Klan, T., Kuhn, S. & Jungmann, F. Accuracy of a chatbot (Ada) in the diagnosis of mental disorders: comparative case study with lay and expert users. JMIR Form. Res. 3, e13863 (2019).
Gilbert, S. et al. How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs. BMJ Open 10, e040269 (2020).
Sarbay, İ., Berikol, G. B. & Özturan, İ. U. Performance of emergency triage prediction of an open access natural language processing based chatbot application (ChatGPT): a preliminary, scenario-based cross-sectional study. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 23, 156–161 (2023).
Denecke, K. Framework for guiding the development of high-quality conversational agents in healthcare. Healthcare 11, 1061 (2023).
Denecke, K., May, R., Gabarron, E. & Lopez-Campos, G. H. Assessing the potential risks of digital therapeutics (DTX): the DTX risk assessment canvas. J. Pers. Med. 13, 1523 (2023).
Stanley, J., ten Brink, R., Valiton, A., Bostic, T. & Scollan, R. in Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (eds Yang, X.-S., Sherratt, S., Dey, N. & Joshi, A.) 919–942 (Springer, 2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Denecke, K. Potential and pitfalls of conversational agents in health care. Nat Rev Dis Primers 9, 66 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00482-x
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-023-00482-x