Abstract
Curved membranes are key features of intracellular organelles, and their generation involves dynamic protein complexes. Here we describe the fundamental mechanisms such as the hydrophobic insertion, scaffolding and crowding mechanisms these proteins use to produce membrane curvatures and complex shapes required to form intracellular organelles and vesicular structures involved in endocytosis and secretion. For each mechanism, we discuss its cellular functions as well as the underlying physical principles and the specific membrane properties required for the mechanism to be feasible. We propose that the integration of individual mechanisms into a highly controlled, robust process of curvature generation often relies on the assembly of proteins into coats. How cells unify and organize the curvature-generating factors at the nanoscale is presented for three ubiquitous coats central for membrane trafficking in eukaryotes: clathrin-coated pits, caveolae, and COPI and COPII coats. The emerging theme is that these coats arrange and coordinate curvature-generating factors in time and space to dynamically shape membranes to accomplish membrane trafficking within cells.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doherty, G. J. & McMahon, H. T. Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 857–902 (2009).
Ishikawa, H. Formation of elaborate networks of T-system tubules in cultured skeletal muscle with special reference to the T-system formation. J. Cell Biol. 38, 51–66 (1968).
Yeow, I. et al. EHD proteins cooperate to generate caveolar clusters and to maintain caveolae during repeated mechanical stress. Curr. Biol. 27, 2951–2962.e2955 (2017).
Lo, H. P. et al. The caveolin–cavin system plays a conserved and critical role in mechanoprotection of skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. 210, 833–849 (2015).
Franzini-Armstrong, C. The relationship between form and function throughout the history of excitation–contraction coupling. J. Gen. Physiol. 150, 189–210 (2018).
Lo, H. P. et al. Cavin4 interacts with Bin1 to promote T-tubule formation and stability in developing skeletal muscle. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/JCB.201905065/VIDEO-1 (2021).
Westrate, L. M., Lee, J. E., Prinz, W. A. & Voeltz, G. K. Form follows function: the importance of endoplasmic reticulum shape. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 791–811 (2015).
Guo, Y. et al. Visualizing intracellular organelle and cytoskeletal interactions at nanoscale resolution on millisecond timescales. Cell 175, 1430–1442.e1417 (2018).
Nixon-Abell, J. et al. Increased spatiotemporal resolution reveals highly dynamic dense tubular matrices in the peripheral ER. Science 354, aaf3928 (2016).
Weigel, A. V. et al. ER-to-Golgi protein delivery through an interwoven, tubular network extending from ER. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.035 (2021).
Ladinsky, M. S., Mastronarde, D. N., McIntosh, J. R., Howell, K. E. & Staehelin, L. A. Golgi structure in three dimensions: functional insights from the normal rat kidney cell. J. Cell Biol. 144, 1135–1149 (1999).
Kalt, M. R. Mitochondrial pleiomorphism in sustentacular cells of Xenopus laevis. Anat. Rec. 182, 53–60 (1975).
Bornstein, S. R., Ehrhart-Bornstein, M., Guse-Behling, H. & Scherbaum, W. A. Structure and dynamics of adrenal mitochondria following stimulation with corticotropin releasing hormone. Anat. Rec. 234, 255–262 (1992).
Bussi, Y. et al. Fundamental helical geometry consolidates the plant photosynthetic membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22366–22375 (2019).
De Matteis, M. A. & Luini, A. Exiting the Golgi complex. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 273–284 (2008).
Zimmerberg, J. & Kozlov, M. M. How proteins produce cellular membrane curvature. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 9–19 (2005).
Omar, Y. A. D., Sahu, A., Sauer, R. A. & Mandadapu, K. K. Nonaxisymmetric shapes of biological membranes from locally induced curvature. Biophys. J. 119, 1065–1077 (2020).
Vasan, R., Rudraraju, S., Akamatsu, M., Garikipati, K. & Rangamani, P. A mechanical model reveals that non-axisymmetric buckling lowers the energy barrier associated with membrane neck constriction. Soft Matter 16, 784–797 (2020).
Auddya, D. et al. Biomembranes undergo complex, non-axisymmetric deformations governed by Kirchhoff-Love kinematics and revealed by a three-dimensional computational framework. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 477, 20210246 (2021).
Faini, M., Beck, R., Wieland, F. T. & Briggs, J. A. G. Vesicle coats: structure, function, and general principles of assembly. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 279–288 (2013).
Parton, R. G., Tillu, V., McMahon, K. A. & Collins, B. M. Key phases in the formation of caveolae. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 71, 7–14 (2021).
Margolis, L. & Sadovsky, Y. The biology of extracellular vesicles: the known unknowns. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000363 (2019).
Hu, J., Prinz, W. A. & Rapoport, T. A. Weaving the web of ER tubules. Cell 147, 1226–1231 (2011).
Mattila, P. K. & Lappalainen, P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 446–454 (2008).
Cramer, L. P. & Mitchison, T. J. Investigation of the mechanism of retraction of the cell margin and rearward flow of nodules during mitotic cell rounding. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 109–119 (1997).
Terasaki, M. et al. Stacked endoplasmic reticulum sheets are connected by helicoidal membrane motifs. Cell 154, 285–296 (2013).
Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T. & Ohsumi, Y. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 107–132 (2011).
Shin, W. et al. Preformed Ω-profile closure and kiss-and-run mediate endocytosis and diverse endocytic modes in neuroendocrine chromaffin cells. Neuron 109, 3119–3134.e3115 (2021).
Parton, R. G. Caveolae: structure, function, and relationship to disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 111–136 (2018).
Golani, G., Ariotti, N., Parton, R. G. & Kozlov, M. M. Membrane curvature and tension control the formation and collapse of caveolar superstructures. Dev. Cell 48, 523–538.e524 (2019).
Shemesh, T. et al. A model for the generation and interconversion of ER morphologies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5243–E5251 (2014).
Schroeder, L. K. et al. Dynamic nanoscale morphology of the ER surveyed by STED microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 218, 83–96 (2019).
Mcmahon, H. T. & Boucrot, E. Membrane curvature at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 128, 1065–1070 (2015).
Bhatia, T., Christ, S., Steinkühler, J., Dimova, R. & Lipowsky, R. Simple sugars shape giant vesicles into multispheres with many membrane necks. Soft Matter 16, 1246–1258 (2020).
Bo, L. & Waugh, R. E. Determination of bilayer membrane bending stiffness by tether formation from giant, thin-walled vesicles. Biophys. J. 55, 509–517 (1989).
Zhao, Z. et al. Super-resolution imaging of highly curved membrane structures in giant vesicles encapsulating molecular condensates. Adv. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202106633 (2021).
Karimi, M. et al. Asymmetric ionic conditions generate large membrane curvatures. Nano Lett. 18, 7816–7821 (2018).
Has, C. & Das, S. L. Recent developments in membrane curvature sensing and induction by proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1865, 129971 (2021).
Ford, M. G. et al. Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin. Nature 419, 361–366 (2002).
Campelo, F., McMahon, H. T. & Kozlov, M. M. The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins. Biophys. J. 95, 2325–2339 (2008).
Stachowiak, J. C. et al. Membrane bending by protein-protein crowding. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 944–949 (2012).
Farsad, K. & De Camilli, P. Mechanisms of membrane deformation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 372–381 (2003).
Gallop, J. L. & McMahon, H. T. BAR domains and membrane curvature: bringing your curves to the BAR. Biochem. Soc. Symp. https://doi.org/10.1042/bss0720223 (2005).
Cooke, I. R. & Deserno, M. Coupling between lipid shape and membrane curvature. Biophys. J. 91, 487–495 (2006).
Carlsson, A. E. Membrane bending by actin polymerization. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 50, 1–7 (2018).
Blood, P. D., Swenson, R. D. & Voth, G. A. Factors influencing local membrane curvature induction by N-BAR domains as revealed by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 95, 1866–1876 (2008).
Li, Z.-L. Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane deformation induced by amphiphilic helices of epsin, Sar1p, and Arf1. Chin. Phys. B 27, 038703 (2018).
Sodt, A. J. & Pastor, R. W. Molecular modeling of lipid membrane curvature induction by a peptide: more than simply shape. Biophys. J. 106, 1958–1969 (2014).
Zemel, A., Ben-Shaul, A. & May, S. Membrane perturbation induced by interfacially adsorbed peptides. Biophys. J. 86, 3607–3619 (2004).
Zemel, A., Ben-Shaul, A. & May, S. Modulation of the spontaneous curvature and bending rigidity of lipid membranes by interfacially adsorbed amphipathic peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6988–6996 (2008).
Spivak, M. A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry (Brandeis University, 1970).
Drin, G. & Antonny, B. Amphipathic helices and membrane curvature. Febs Lett. 584, 1840–1847 (2010).
Cornell, R. & Taneva, S. Amphipathic helices as mediators of the membrane interaction of amphitropic proteins, and as modulators of bilayer physical properties. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 7, 539–552 (2006).
Segrest, J. P., Garber, D. W., Brouillette, C. G., Harvey, S. C. & Anantharamaiah, G. M. The amphipathic alpha helix: a multifunctional structural motif in plasma apolipoproteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 45, 303–369 (1994).
Giménez-Andrés, M., Čopič, A. & Antonny, B. The many faces of amphipathic helices. Biomolecules 8, 45 (2018).
Ambroso, M. R., Hegde, B. G. & Langen, R. Endophilin A1 induces different membrane shapes using a conformational switch that is regulated by phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6982–6987 (2014).
Gallop, J. L. et al. Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature. EMBO J. 25, 2898–2910 (2006).
Kweon DH, S. Y. et al. Membrane topology of helix 0 of the epsin N-terminal homology domaintle. Mol. Cell 21, 428–435 (2006).
Isas, J. M., Ambroso, M. R., Hegde, P. B., Langen, J. & Langen, R. Tubulation by amphiphysin requires concentration-dependent switching from wedging to scaffolding. Structure 23, 873–881 (2015).
Varkey, J. et al. Membrane curvature induction and tubulation are common features of synucleins and apolipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 32486–32493 (2010).
Herrick, D. Z., Sterbling, S., Rasch, K. A., Hinderliter, A. & Cafiso, D. S. Position of synaptotagmin I at the membrane interface: cooperative interactions of tandem C2 domains. Biochemistry 45, 9668–9674 (2006).
Rufener, E., Frazier, A. A., Wieser, C. M., Hinderliter, A. & Cafiso, D. S. Membrane-bound orientation and position of the synaptotagmin C2B domain determined by site-directed spin labeling. Biochemistry 44, 18–28 (2005).
Wang, N. et al. Mechanism of membrane-curvature generation by ER-tubule shaping proteins. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–15 (2021).
Ergüder, M. F. & Deserno, M. Identifying systematic errors in a power spectral analysis of simulated lipid membranes. J. Chem. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049448 (2021).
Hamm, M. & Kozlov, M. M. Tilt model of inverted amphiphilic mesophases. Eur. Phys. J. B Condens. Matter Complex. Syst. 6, 519–528 (1998).
Hamm, M. & Kozlov, M. M. Elastic energy of tilt and bending of fluid membranes. Eur. Phys. J. E 3, 323–335 (2000).
Terzi, M. M., Ergüder, M. F. & Deserno, M. A consistent quadratic curvature-tilt theory for fluid lipid membranes. J. Chem. Phys. 151, 164108 (2019).
Campelo, F., Fabrikant, G., McMahon, H. T. & Kozlov, M. M. Modeling membrane shaping by proteins: focus on EHD2 and N-BAR domains. FEBS Lett. 584, 1830–1839 (2010).
Kozlov, M. M. et al. Mechanisms shaping cell membranes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 29, 53–60 (2014).
Kahraman, O., Langen, R. & Haselwandter, C. A. Directed supramolecular organization of N-BAR proteins through regulation of H0 membrane immersion depth. Sci. Rep. 8, 16383 (2018).
Martens, S., Kozlov, M. M. & McMahon, H. T. How synaptotagmin promotes membrane fusion. Science 316, 1205–1208 (2007).
Chernomordik, L. Non-bilayer lipids and biological fusion intermediates. Chem. Phys. Lipids 81, 203–213 (1996).
Fuller, N. & Rand, R. P. The influence of lysolipids on the spontaneous curvature and bending elasticity of phospholipid membranes. Biophys. J. 81, 243–254 (2001).
Fernandes, F. et al. Role of helix 0 of the N-BAR domain in membrane curvature generation. Biophys. J. 94, 3065–3073 (2008).
Chen, Z., Zhu, C., Kuo, C. J., Robustelli, J. & Baumgart, T. The N-terminal amphipathic helix of endophilin does not contribute to its molecular curvature generation capacity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 14616–14622 (2016).
Sheetz, M. P. & Singer, S. J. Biological membranes as bilayer couples. A molecular mechanism of drug-erythrocyte interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 4457–4461 (1974).
Hossein, A. & Deserno, M. Spontaneous curvature, differential stress, and bending modulus of asymmetric lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 118, 624–642 (2020).
Miettinen, M. S. & Lipowsky, R. Bilayer membranes with frequent flip-flops have tensionless leaflets. Nano Lett. 19, 5011–5016 (2019).
Kozlov, M. M. & Helfrich, W. Effects of a cosurfactant on the stretching and bending elasticities of a surfactant monolayer. Langmuir 8, 2792–2797 (2002).
Markin, V. S. Lateral organization of membranes and cell shapes. Biophys. J. 36, 1–19 (1981).
Fournier, J.-B. Microscopic membrane elasticity and interactions among membrane inclusions: interplay between the shape, dilation, tilt and tilt-difference modes. Eur. Phys. J. B Condens. Matter Complex. Syst. 11, 261–272 (2012).
Messa, M. et al. Epsin deficiency impairs endocytosis by stalling the actin-dependent invagination of endocytic clathrin-coated pits. Elife 3, e03311 (2014).
Miller, S. E. et al. CALM regulates clathrin-coated vesicle size and maturation by directly sensing and driving membrane curvature. Dev. Cell 33, 163–175 (2015).
Busch, D. J. et al. Intrinsically disordered proteins drive membrane curvature. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–11 (2015).
Bickel, T., Jeppesen, C. & Marques, C. M. Local entropic effects of polymers grafted to soft interfaces. Eur. Phys. J. E 4, 33–43 (2001).
Hiergeist, C. & Lipowsky, R. Elastic properties of polymer-decorated membranes. J. Phys. II 6, 1465–1481 (1996).
Hristova, K. & Needham, D. The influence of polymer-grafted lipids on the physical properties of lipid bilayers: a theoretical study. J. Colloid . Interface Sci. 168, 302–314 (1994).
Kuo, J. C. H. & Paszek, M. J. Glycocalyx curving the membrane: forces emerging from the cell exterior. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 37, 257–283 (2021).
Lipowsky, R. Bending of membranes by anchored polymers. Europhys. Lett. 30, 197 (1995).
Marsh, D. Elastic constants of polymer-grafted lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 81, 2154–2162 (2001).
Milner, S. T. & Witten, T. A. Bending moduli of polymeric surfactant interfaces. J. Phys. 49, 1951–1962 (1988).
Sens, P. & Turner, M. S. Theoretical model for the formation of caveolae and similar membrane invaginations. Biophys. J. 86, 2049–2057 (2004).
Shurer, C. R. et al. Physical principles of membrane shape regulation by the glycocalyx. Cell 177, 1757–1770.e1721 (2019).
Tsafrir, I., Caspi, Y., Guedeau-Boudeville, M. A., Arzi, T. & Stavans, J. Budding and tubulation in highly oblate vesicles by anchored amphiphilic molecules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 138102 (2003).
Lerche, D., Kozlov, M. M. & Markin, V. S. Electrostatic free-energy and spontaneous curvature of spherical charged layered membrane. Biorheology 24, 23–34 (1987).
Button, B. et al. A periciliary brush promotes the lung health by separating the mucus layer from airway epithelia. Science 337, 937–941 (2012).
Bennett, R. J. et al. Mucin MUC1 is seen in cell surface protrusions together with ezrin in immunoelectron tomography and is concentrated at tips of filopodial protrusions in MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 67–77 (2001).
Kesimer, M. et al. Molecular organization of the mucins and glycocalyx underlying mucus transport over mucosal surfaces of the airways. Mucosal Immunol. 6, 379–392 (2012).
Fowke, T. M. et al. Hyaluronan synthesis by developing cortical neurons in vitro. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–13 (2017).
Zeno, W. F. et al. Molecular mechanisms of membrane curvature sensing by a disordered protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 10361–10371 (2019).
Zeno, W. F., Snead, W. T., Thatte, A. S. & Stachowiak, J. C. Structured and intrinsically disordered domains within Amphiphysin1 work together to sense and drive membrane curvature. Soft Matter 15, 8706–8717 (2019).
Alexander, S. Adsorption of chain molecules with a polar head a-scaling description. J. Phys. 38, 983–987 (1977).
Alexander, S. Polymer adsorption on small spheres - scaling approach. J. Phys. 38, 977–981 (1977).
de Gennes, P. G. Conformations of polymers attached to an interface. Macromolecules 13, 1069–1075 (1980).
Marsh, D., Bartucci, R. & Sportelli, L. Lipid membranes with grafted polymers: physicochemical aspects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1615, 33–59 (2003).
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 285–298 (2017).
Li, P. et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins. Nature 483, 336–340 (2012).
Yuan, F. et al. Membrane bending by protein phase separation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2017435118 (2021).
Simunovic, M., Evergren, E., Callan-Jones, A. & Bassereau, P. Curving cells inside and out: roles of BAR domain proteins in membrane shaping and its cellular implications. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 35, 111–129 (2019).
Zhang, Y. et al. Structural insights into membrane remodeling by SNX1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022614118 (2021).
Leneva, N., Kovtun, O., Morado, D. R., Briggs, J. A. G. & Owen, D. J. Architecture and mechanism of metazoan retromer:SNX3 tubular coat assembly. Sci. Adv. 7, 1–10 (2021).
Johannes, L. The cellular and chemical biology of endocytic trafficking and intracellular delivery — the GL-Lect hypothesis. Molecules https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES26113299 (2021).
Dodonova, S. O. et al. A structure of the COPI coat and the role of coat proteins in membrane vesicle assembly. Science 349, 195–198 (2015).
Bi, X., Corpina, R. A. & Goldberg, J. Structure of the SEC23/24-SAR1 pre-budding complex of the COPII vesicle coat. Nature 419, 271–277 (2002).
Kirchhausen, T., Owen, D. & Harrison, S. C. Molecular structure, function, and dynamics of clathrin-mediated membrane traffic. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A016725 (2014).
Antonny, B. et al. Membrane fission by dynamin: what we know and what we need to know. EMBO J. 35, 2270–2284 (2016).
Caillat, C., Maity, S., Miguet, N., Roos, W. H. & Weissenhorn, W. The role of VPS4 in ESCRT-III polymer remodeling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 47, 441–448 (2019).
Remec Pavlin, M. & Hurley, J. H. The ESCRTs - converging on mechanism. J. Cell Sci. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.240333 (2020).
Sundquist, W. I. & Kräusslich, H. G. HIV-1 assembly, budding, and maturation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A006924 (2012).
Frost, A. et al. Structural basis of membrane invagination by F-BAR domains. Cell 132, 807–817 (2008).
Yu, H. & Schulten, K. Membrane sculpting by F-BAR domains studied by molecular dynamics simulations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002892 (2013).
Ling, H. et al. Structure of the Shiga-like toxin I B-pentamer complexed with an analogue of its receptor Gb3. Biochemistry 37, 1777–1788 (1998).
Zheng, J. et al. Identification of the binding site for acidic phospholipids on the PH domain of dynamin: implications for stimulation of GTPase activity. J. Mol. Biol. 255, 14–21 (1996).
Cremona, O. & De Camilli, P. Phosphoinositides in membrane traffic at the synapse. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1041–1052 (2001).
Johannes, L., Wunder, C. & Bassereau, P. Bending “on the rocks” — a cocktail of biophysical modules to build endocytic pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 6 https://doi.org/10.1101/CSHPERSPECT.A016741 (2014).
Pezeshkian, W. et al. Membrane invagination induced by Shiga toxin B-subunit: from molecular structure to tube formation. Soft Matter 12, 5164–5171 (2016).
Mim, C. & Unger, V. M. Membrane curvature and its generation by BAR proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 526–533 (2012).
Bonifacino, J. S. & Lippincott-Schwartz, J. Coat proteins: shaping membrane transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 409–414 (2003).
Mettlen, M., Chen., P.-H., Srinivasan, S., Danuser, G. & Schmid, S. L. Regulation of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 87, 871–896 (2018).
Fotin, A. et al. Molecular model for a complete clathrin lattice from electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 432, 573–579 (2004).
Sochacki, K. A. & Taraska, J. W. From flat to curved clathrin: controlling a plastic ratchet. Trends Cell Biol. 29, 241–256 (2019).
Kaneseki, T. & Kadota, K. The “vesicle in a basket”. J. Cell Biol. 42, 202–220 (1969).
Roth, T. F. & Porter, K. R. Yolk protein uptake in the oocyte of the mosquito Aedes aegypti L. J. Cell Biol. 20, 313–332 (1964).
Taylor, M. J., Perrais, D. & Merrifield, C. J. A high precision survey of the molecular dynamics of mammalian clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000604 (2011).
Merrifield, C. J., Feldman, M. E., Wan, L. & Almers, W. Imaging actin and dynamin recruitment during invagination of single clathrin-coated pits. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 691–698 (2002).
Gaidarov, I., Santini, F., Warren, R. A. & Keen, J. H. Spatial control of coated-pit dynamics in living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 1–7 (1999).
Kirchhausen, T. Imaging endocytic clathrin structures in living cells. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 596–605 (2009).
Kaksonen, M., Toret, C. P. & Drubin, D. G. A modular design for the clathrin- and actin-mediated endocytosis machinery. Cell 123, 305–320 (2005).
Taylor, M. J., Lampe, M. & Merrifield, C. J. A feedback loop between dynamin and actin recruitment during clathrin-mediated endocytosis. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001302 (2012).
Li, D. et al. Advanced imaging. Extended-resolution structured illumination imaging of endocytic and cytoskeletal dynamics. Science 349, aab3500 (2015).
Chen, Z. & Schmid, S. L. Evolving models for assembling and shaping clathrin-coated pits. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/JCB.202005126 (2020).
Heuser, J. & Keen, J. Deep-etch visualization of proteins involved in clathrin assembly. J. Cell Biol. 107, 877–886 (1988).
Sochacki, K. A. et al. The structure and spontaneous curvature of clathrin lattices at the plasma membrane. Dev. Cell 56, 1131–1146.e1133 (2021).
Kovtun, O., Dickson, V. K., Kelly, B. T., Owen, D. J. & Briggs, J. A. G. Architecture of the AP2/clathrin coat on the membranes of clathrin-coated vesicles. Sci. Adv. 6, 1–10 (2020).
Posor, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal control of endocytosis by phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate. Nature 499, 233–237 (2013).
Park, R. J. et al. Dynamin triple knockout cells reveal off target effects of commonly used dynamin inhibitors. J. Cell Sci. 126, 5305–5312 (2013).
Cocucci, E., Aguet, F., Boulant, S. & Kirchhausen, T. The first five seconds in the life of a clathrin-coated pit. Cell 150, 495–507 (2012).
Ma, L. et al. Transient Fcho1/2Eps15/RAP-2 nanoclusters prime the AP-2 clathrin adaptor for cargo binding. Dev. Cell 37, 428–443 (2016).
Traub, L. M. A nanobody-based molecular toolkit provides new mechanistic insight into clathrin-coat initiation. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41768 (2019).
Henne, W. M. et al. FCHo proteins are nucleators of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Science 328, 1281–1284 (2010).
Kozak, M. & Kaksonen, M. Condensation of Ede1 promotes the initiation of endocytosis. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72865 (2022).
Day, K. J. et al. Liquid-like protein interactions catalyse assembly of endocytic vesicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 366–376 (2021).
Sochacki, K. A., Dickey, A. M., Strub, M. P. & Taraska, J. W. Endocytic proteins are partitioned at the edge of the clathrin lattice in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 352–361 (2017).
Haucke, V. & Kozlov, M. M. Membrane remodeling in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 131, jcs216812 (2018).
Teyra, J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the human SH3 domain family reveals a wide variety of non-canonical specificities. Structure 25, 1598–1610.e1593 (2017).
Matthaeus, C. & Taraska, J. W. Energy and dynamics of caveolae trafficking. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 614472 (2020).
Bucher, D. et al. Clathrin-adaptor ratio and membrane tension regulate the flat-to-curved transition of the clathrin coat during endocytosis. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018).
Dambournet, D. et al. Genome-edited human stem cells expressing fluorescently labeled endocytic markers allow quantitative analysis of clathrin-mediated endocytosis during differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 217, 3301–3311 (2018).
Heuser, J. Effects of cytoplasmic acidification on clathrin lattice morphology. J. Cell Biol. 108, 401–411 (1989).
Tagiltsev, G., Haselwandter, C. A. & Scheuring, S. Nanodissected elastically loaded clathrin lattices relax to increased curvature. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg9934 (2021).
Zeno, W. F. et al. Clathrin senses membrane curvature. Biophys. J. 120, 818–828 (2021).
Dannhauser, P. N. & Ungewickell, E. J. Reconstitution of clathrin-coated bud and vesicle formation with minimal components. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 634 (2012).
Avinoam, O., Schorb, M., Beese, C. J., Briggs, J. A. & Kaksonen, M. Endocytic sites mature by continuous bending and remodeling of the clathrin coat. Science 348, 1369–1372 (2015).
Scott, B. L. et al. Membrane bending occurs at all stages of clathrin-coat assembly and defines endocytic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–9 (2018).
Nawara, T. J. et al. Imaging vesicle formation dynamics supports the flexible model of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Commun. 13, 1732 (2022).
Grove, J. et al. Flat clathrin lattices: stable features of the plasma membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 3581–3594 (2014).
Nossal, R. Energetics of clathrin basket assembly. Traffic 2, 138–147 (2001).
Alfonzo-Mendez, M. A., Sochacki, K. A., Strub, M. P. & Taraska, J. W. Dual clathrin and integrin signaling systems regulate growth factor receptor activation. Nat. Commun. 13, 905 (2022).
Mund, M. et al. Systematic nanoscale analysis of endocytosis links efficient vesicle formation to patterned actin nucleation. Cell 174, 884–896 e817 (2018).
Palade, G. E. Fine structure of blood capillaries. J. Appl. Phys. 24, 1424–1424 (1953).
Yamada, E. The fine structure of the gall bladder epithelium of the mouse. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 1, 445–458 (1955).
Sinha, B. et al. Cells respond to mechanical stress by rapid disassembly of caveolae. Cell 144, 402–413 (2011).
Parton, R. G. & del Pozo, M. A. Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 98–112 (2013).
Gervasio, O. L., Phillips, W. D., Cole, L. & Allen, D. G. Caveolae respond to cell stretch and contribute to stretch-induced signaling. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3581–3590 (2011).
Zhou, Y. et al. Caveolin-1 and cavin1 act synergistically to generate a unique lipid environment in caveolae. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202005138 (2021).
Han, B., Copeland, C. A., Tiwari, A. & Kenworthy, A. K. Assembly and turnover of caveolae: what do we really know? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 4, 68 (2016).
Feron, O., Michel, J. B., Sase, K. & Michel, T. Dynamic regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: complementary roles of dual acylation and caveolin interactions. Biochemistry 37, 193–200 (1998).
Stan, R. V., Kubitza, M. & Palade, G. E. PV-1 is a component of the fenestral and stomatal diaphragms in fenestrated endothelia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13203–13207 (1999).
Rothberg, K. G. et al. Caveolin, a protein component of caveolae membrane coats. Cell 68, 673–682 (1992).
Cohen, A. W., Hnasko, R., Schubert, W. & Lisanti, M. P. Role of caveolae and caveolins in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 84, 1341–1379 (2004).
Hayer, A., Stoeber, M., Bissig, C. & Helenius, A. Biogenesis of caveolae: stepwise assembly of large caveolin and cavin complexes. Traffic 11, 361–382 (2010).
Walser, P. J. et al. Constitutive formation of caveolae in a bacterium. Cell 150, 752–763 (2012).
Porta, J. C. et al. The building blocks of caveolae, revealed. Biophys. J. 121, 2–2 (2022).
Han, B. et al. Structure and assembly of CAV1 8S complexes revealed by single particle electron microscopy. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc6185 (2020).
Tillu, V. A. et al. Cavin1 intrinsically disordered domains are essential for fuzzy electrostatic interactions and caveola formation. Nat. Commun. 12, 931 (2021).
Zimnicka, A. M. et al. Src-dependent phosphorylation of caveolin-1 Tyr-14 promotes swelling and release of caveolae. Mol. Biol. Cell 27, 2090–2106 (2016).
Hansen, C. G., Howard, G. & Nichols, B. J. Pacsin 2 is recruited to caveolae and functions in caveolar biogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2777–2785 (2011).
Koch, D., Westermann, M., Kessels, M. M. & Qualmann, B. Ultrastructural freeze-fracture immunolabeling identifies plasma membrane-localized syndapin II as a crucial factor in shaping caveolae. Histochem. Cell Biol. 138, 215–230 (2012).
Gomez-Navarro, N. & Miller, E. A. COP-coated vesicles. Curr. Biol. 26, R54–R57 (2016).
Bethune, J. & Wieland, F. T. Assembly of COPI and COPII vesicular coat proteins on membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 47, 63–83 (2018).
Hughes, H. & Stephens, D. J. Assembly, organization, and function of the COPII coat. Histochem. Cell Biol. 129, 129–151 (2008).
Hammond, A. T. & Glick, B. S. Dynamics of transitional endoplasmic reticulum sites in vertebrate cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3013–3030 (2000).
Yu, X., Breitman, M. & Goldberg, J. A structure-based mechanism for ARF1-dependent recruitment of coatomer to membranes. Cell 148, 530–542 (2012).
Faini, M. et al. The structures of COPI-coated vesicles reveal alternate coatomer conformations and interactions. Science 336, 1451–1454 (2012).
Dodonova, S. O. et al. 9A structure of the COPI coat reveals that the ARF1 GTPase occupies two contrasting molecular environments. Elife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26691 (2017).
Hariri, H., Bhattacharya, N., Johnson, K., Noble, A. J. & Stagg, S. M. Insights into the mechanisms of membrane curvature and vesicle scission by the small GTPase SAR1 in the early secretory pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 3811–3826 (2014).
Beck, R. et al. Membrane curvature induced by ARF1-GTP is essential for vesicle formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11731–11736 (2008).
Beck, R. et al. Coatomer and dimeric ADP ribosylation factor 1 promote distinct steps in membrane scission. J. Cell Biol. 194, 765–777 (2011).
Boucrot, E. et al. Membrane fission is promoted by insertion of amphipathic helices and is restricted by crescent BAR domains. Cell 149, 124–136 (2012).
Kroppen, B. et al. Cooperativity of membrane-protein and protein–protein interactions control membrane remodeling by epsin 1 and affects clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 2355–2370 (2021).
Tarasenko, D. et al. The MICOS component Mic60 displays a conserved membrane-bending activity that is necessary for normal cristae morphology. J. Cell Biol. 216, 889–899 (2017).
Yoon, Y. et al. Molecular basis of the potent membrane-remodeling activity of the epsin 1 N-terminal homology domain. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 531–540 (2010).
Braun, A. R., Lacy, M. M., Ducas, V. C., Rhoades, E. & Sachs, J. N. α-Synuclein’s uniquely long amphipathic helix enhances its membrane binding and remodeling capacity. J. Membr. Biol. 250, 183–193 (2017).
Hoover, B. M. et al. Membrane remodeling and stimulation of aggregation following α-synuclein adsorption to phosphotidylserine vesicles. J. Phys. Chem. B 125, 1582–1594 (2021).
Mizuno, N. et al. Remodeling of lipid vesicles into cylindrical micelles by α-synuclein in an extended α-helical conformation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 29301–29311 (2012).
Varkey, J. et al. α-synuclein oligomers with broken helical conformation form lipoprotein nanoparticles. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 17620–17630 (2013).
Westphal, C. H. & Chandra, S. S. Monomeric synucleins generate membrane curvature. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 1829–1840 (2013).
Powers, R. E., Wang, S., Liu, T. Y. & Rapoport, T. A. Reconstitution of the tubular endoplasmic reticulum network with purified components. Nature 543, 257–260 (2017).
Opaliński, Ł., Kiel, J. A. K. W., Williams, C., Veenhuis, M. & Klei, I. J. V. D. Membrane curvature during peroxisome fission requires Pex11. EMBO J. 30, 5–16 (2011).
Su, J. et al. The N-terminal amphipathic helix of Pex11p self-interacts to induce membrane remodelling during peroxisome fission. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860, 1292–1300 (2018).
Bielli, A. et al. Regulation of Sar1 NH 2 terminus by GTP binding and hydrolysis promotes membrane deformation to control COPII vesicle fission. J. Cell Biol. 171, 919–924 (2005).
Lee, M. C. S. et al. Sar1p N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle. Cell 122, 605–617 (2005).
Krauss, M. et al. Arf1-GTP-induced tubule formation suggests a function of arf family proteins in curvature acquisition at sites of vesicle budding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 27717–27723 (2008).
Lundmark, R. et al. Arf family GTP loading is activated by, and generates, positive membrane curvature. Biochem. J. 414, 189–194 (2008).
Martyna, A. et al. Membrane remodeling by the M2 amphipathic helix drives influenza virus membrane scission. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/SREP44695 (2017).
Farsad, K. et al. Generation of high curvature membranes mediated by direct endophilin bilayer interactions. J. Cell Biol. 155, 193–200 (2001).
Masuda, M. et al. Endophilin BAR domain drives membrane curvature by two newly identified structure-based mechanisms. EMBO J. 25, 2889–2897 (2006).
Peter, B. J. et al. BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure. Science 303, 495–499 (2004).
Takei, K., Slepnev, V. I., Haucke, V. & De Camilli, P. Functional partnership between amphiphysin and dynamin in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 33 (1999).
Hui, E., Bai, J. & Chapman, E. R. Ca2+-triggered simultaneous membrane penetration of the tandem C2-domains of synaptotagmin I. Biophys. J. 91, 1767–1777 (2006).
Groffen, A. J. et al. Doc2b is a high-affinity Ca2+ sensor for spontaneous neurotransmitter release. Science 327, 1614–1618 (2010).
Sorkin, R. et al. Synaptotagmin-1 and Doc2b exhibit distinct membrane-remodeling mechanisms. Biophys. J. 118, 643–656 (2020).
Helfrich, W. Elastic properties of lipid bilayers: theory and possible experiments. Z. Naturforsch. Sect. C. 28, 693–703 (1973).
Doktorova, M., Harries, D. & Khelashvili, G. Determination of bending rigidity and tilt modulus of lipid membranes from real-space fluctuation analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 16806–16818 (2017).
May, S., Kozlovsky, Y., Ben-Shaul, A. & Kozlov, M. M. Tilt modulus of a lipid monolayer. Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 299–308 (2004).
Nagle, J. F., Jablin, M. S., Tristram-Nagle, S. & Akabori, K. What are the true values of the bending modulus of simple lipid bilayers? Chem. Phys. Lipids 185, 3–10 (2015).
Siegel, D. P. & Kozlov, M. M. The gaussian curvature elastic modulus of N-monomethylated dioleoylphosphatidylethanolamine: relevance to membrane fusion and lipid phase behavior. Biophys. J. 87, 366–374 (2004).
Kozlovsky, Y. & Kozlov, M. M. Membrane fission: model for intermediate structures. Biophys. J. 85, 85–96 (2003).
Kozlovsky, Y. & Kozlov, M. M. Stalk model of membrane fusion: solution of energy crisis. Biophys. J. 82, 882–895 (2002).
Dimova, R. Recent developments in the field of bending rigidity measurements on membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 208, 225–234 (2014).
Bickel, T., Marques, C. & Jeppesen, C. Pressure patches for membranes: the induced pinch of a grafted polymer. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1124 (2000).
Breidenich, M., Netz, R. R. & Lipowsky, R. The shape of polymer-decorated membranes. Europhys. Lett. 49, 431 (2000).
Blondeau, F. et al. Tandem MS analysis of brain clathrin-coated vesicles reveals their critical involvement in synaptic vesicle recycling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3833–3838 (2004).
Acknowledgements
M.M.K. is supported by SFB 958 “Scaffolding of Membranes” (Germany) and Singapore–Israel (NRF-ISF) research grant 3292/19. J.W.T is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. The authors apologize to the many authors whose work could not to be specifically cited in this Review due to space constraints and the long, deep and rich history of this growing and innovative field.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to all aspects of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology thanks Patricia Bassereau, Tobias Baumgart, who co-reviewed with Samsuzzoha Mondal and Rumiana Dimova, who co-reviewed with Jan Steinkühler for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Glossary
- Caveolae
-
Flask-shaped nano-structures of plasma membrane rich in proteins, as well as lipids such as cholesterol and sphingolipids, and having several functions in intracellular signal transduction.
- Phagophore
-
A flat cisterna-like membrane compartment serving as a precursor of autophagosome formation.
- Mitochondrial cristae
-
Folds in the inner membrane of a mitochondrion.
- Receptor expression-enhancing proteins
-
(REEPs). Proteins belonging to the Yip (Ypt-interacting protein) family and identified by their ability to enhance cell surface expression of a subset of G protein-coupled receptors.
- ENTH domain
-
The epsin amino-terminal homology domain serving as a structural domain that is found in proteins involved in endocytosis and cytoskeletal machinery.
- BAR domains
-
Highly conserved protein dimerization domains that occur in many proteins involved in membrane dynamics in a cell. BAR domains are named after three proteins that they are found in: BIN, amphiphysin and Rvs.
- SAR1
-
A protein involved in membrane trafficking. It is a monomeric small GTPase found in COPII vesicles.
- ARF1
-
ADP-ribosylation factor involved in protein trafficking among different compartments. It modulates vesicle budding and uncoating within the Golgi complex.
- Synaptotagmin
-
A family of proteins with an amino-terminal transmembrane domain and two cytoplasmic C2 domains. Many C2 domains mediate calcium-dependent binding to negatively charged membranes.
- Lysolipids
-
Any derivative of a lipid in which one hydrocarbon chain has been removed by hydrolysis.
- Helfrich model
-
A theoretical model describing the bending elasticity of lipid membranes. It enables computations of the energy of membrane curvature generation and is based on the concepts of membrane spontaneous curvature and bending moduli.
- Epsins
-
A family of highly conserved membrane proteins that are important in creating membrane curvature. Epsins contribute to membrane deformations like endocytosis, and block vesicle formation during mitosis.
- CALM
-
Clathrin assembly lymphoid myeloid, a member of ANTH-domain containing proteins that promotes clathrin assembly.
- AP180
-
A protein that plays an important role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of synaptic vesicles. It is capable of simultaneously binding both membrane lipids (via an ANTH domain) and clathrin, and is therefore thought to recruit clathrin to the membrane of newly invaginating vesicles.
- Glycocalyx
-
A dense, gel-like meshwork of glycoproteins and glycolipids that surrounds the cell, constituting a physical barrier for any object to enter the cell.
- Protein condensates
-
A class of membraneless organelles and organelle subdomains which carry out specialized functions within the cell and which can form through interaction of protein disordered domains.
- Sorting nexins
-
(SNXs). A large group of proteins that are localized in the cytoplasm and have the potential for membrane association either through their lipid-binding PX domain (a phospholipid-binding motif) or through protein–protein interactions with membrane-associated protein complexes.
- Retromers
-
Heteropentameric complexes, which in humans are composed of a less defined membrane-associated sorting nexin (SNX) dimer (SNX1, SNX2, SNX5 and SNX6) and a vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) trimer containing VPS26, VPS29 and VPS35.
- Shiga toxins
-
A family of related toxins with two major groups, Stx1 and Stx2, expressed by genes considered to be part of the genome of lambdoid prophages.
- Dynamin
-
A GTPase responsible for endocytosis in the eukaryotic cell.
- ESCRT
-
The endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) machinery consisting of cytosolic protein complexes, known as ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II and ESCRT-III. Together with a number of accessory proteins, these ESCRT complexes enable membrane remodelling that results in membranes bending/budding away from the cytoplasm.
- AP2
-
A multimeric protein that works on the cell membrane to internalize cargo in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.
- FCHO2
-
F-BAR domain-only protein 2, a protein that functions in an early step of clathrin-mediated endocytosis.
- ESP15
-
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor substrate 15, a protein present at clathrin-coated pits in receptor-mediated endocytosis of EGF.
- Intersectin
-
A cytoplasmic membrane-associated protein that indirectly coordinates endocytic membrane trafficking with the actin assembly machinery.
- β-Arrestins
-
Multifunctional intracellular proteins with an ability to directly interact with a large number of cellular partners.
- DAB2
-
Disabled 2, a clathrin- and cargo-binding endocytic adaptor protein recognized for its multifaceted roles in signalling pathways.
- HIP1R
-
A component of clathrin-coated pits and vesicles that may link the endocytic machinery to the actin cytoskeleton.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kozlov, M.M., Taraska, J.W. Generation of nanoscopic membrane curvature for membrane trafficking. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 24, 63–78 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00511-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00511-9
This article is cited by
-
Adhesion energy controls lipid binding-mediated endocytosis
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Mesoscale simulation of biomembranes with FreeDTS
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Membrane transformations of fusion and budding
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Targeting small GTPases: emerging grasps on previously untamable targets, pioneered by KRAS
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2023)
-
A Review of Mechanics-Based Mesoscopic Membrane Remodeling Methods: Capturing Both the Physics and the Chemical Diversity
The Journal of Membrane Biology (2022)