Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Generation of paternal haploids in wheat by genome editing of the centromeric histone CENH3

Abstract

New breeding technologies accelerate germplasm improvement and reduce the cost of goods in seed production1,2,3. Many such technologies could use in vivo paternal haploid induction (HI), which occurs when double fertilization precedes maternal (egg cell) genome loss. Engineering of the essential CENTROMERIC HISTONE (CENH3) gene induces paternal HI in Arabidopsis4,5,6. Despite conservation of CENH3 function across crops, CENH3-based HI has not been successful outside of the Arabidopsis model system7. Here we report a commercially operable paternal HI line in wheat with a ~7% HI rate, identified by screening genome-edited TaCENH3α-heteroallelic combinations. Unlike in Arabidopsis, edited alleles exhibited reduced transmission in female gametophytes, and heterozygous genotypes triggered higher HI rates than homozygous combinations. These developments might pave the way for the deployment of CENH3 HI technology in diverse crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Genome editing strategy and generation of HI alleles.
Fig. 2: Haploid and inducer phenotypes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available in the manuscript and the Supplementary Materials.

References

  1. Chang, M. T. & Coe, E. in Molecular Genetics Approaches to Maize Improvement (eds Kriz, A. L. & Larkins, B. A.) 127–142 (Springer, 2009)

  2. Jacquier, N. M. A. et al. Puzzling out plant reproduction by haploid induction for innovations in plant breeding. Nat. Plants 6, 610–619 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelliher, T. et al. One-step genome editing of elite crop germplasm during haploid induction. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 287–292 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ravi, M. & Chan, S. W. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464, 615–618 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuppu, S. et al. Point mutations in centromeric histone induce post-zygotic incompatibility and uniparental inheritance. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005494 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuppu S., et al. A variety of changes, including CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions, in CENH3 lead to haploid induction on outcrossing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 2068–2080 (2020).

  7. Kelliher, T. et al. Maternal haploids are preferentially induced by CENH3-tailswap transgenic complementation in maize. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 414 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelliher, T. et al. MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 542, 105–109 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilles, L. M. et al. Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize. EMBO J. 36, 707–717 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, C. et al. A 4-bp Insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase a generates haploid induction in maize. Mol. Plant 10, 520–522 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, L. et al. OsMATL mutation induces haploid seed formation in Indica rice. Nat Plants 4, 530–533 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, C. et al. Extension of the in vivo haploid induction system from diploid maize to hexaploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 18, 316–318 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, H. et al. Efficient induction of haploid plants in wheat by editing of TaMTL using an optimized Agrobacterium-mediated CRISPR system. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 1337–1349 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong, Y. et al. A DMP-triggered in vivo maternal haploid induction system in the dicotyledonous Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 6, 466–472 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalinowska, K. et al. State-of-the-art and novel developments of in vivo haploid technologies. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 593–605 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan, J., Guo, X., Hu, J., Lv, Z. & Han, F. Characterization of two CENH3 genes and their roles in wheat evolution. New Phytol. 206, 839–851 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karimi-Ashtiyani, R. et al. Point mutation impairs centromeric CENH3 loading and induces haploid plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11211–11216 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maheshwari, S. et al. Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004970 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, W. et al. Histone modifications associated with both A and B chromosomes of maize. Chromosome Res. 16, 1203–1214 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deal, R. B. & Henikoff, S. Histone variants and modifications in plant gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 116–122 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Laurie, D. A. & Bennett, M. D. The production of haploid wheat plants from wheat × maize crosses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76, 393–397 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaqueth, J. S. et al. Fertility restoration of maize CMS-C altered by a single amino acid substitution within the Rf4 bHLH transcription factor. Plant J. 101, 101–111 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Flood, P. J. et al. Reciprocal cybrids reveal how organellar genomes affect plant phenotypes. Nat. Plants 6, 13–21 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Evans, M. The indeterminate gametophyte1 gene of maize encodes a LOB domain protein required for embryo sac and leaf development. Plant Cell 19, 46–62 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wright et al. Efficient biolistic transformation of maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using the phosphomannose isomerase gene, pmi, as the selectable marker. Plant Cell Rep. 20, 429–436 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gui, H., Liu, Y., Han, K. & Li, X. The relationship between PMI (manA) gene expression and optimal selection pressure in Indica rice transformation. Plant Cell Rep. 33, 1081–1090 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Loureiro, J., Rodriguez, E., Doležel, J. & Santos, C. Comparison of four nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry. Ann. Bot. 98, 679–689 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Z. Chai, L. Geng, Y. Liu, X. Zhang, R. Cui and Y. Ren for their work generating the genome-edited plants. Thanks to Y. Ma and Y. Zhang for data analysis. We thank Y. Gao and W. Teng for wheat outcrossing and G. Tang for gene sequencing and characterization of CENH3 expression. Thanks to M. Zong for ploidy analysis support and to W. Huang, C. Ma, Y. Pan, X. He, W. Jin, C. Gao and F. Han for technique suggestions. We thank J. Green, L. Kavanaugh, M. Rose and X. Tan for bioinformatics support and C. Leming for intellectual property guidance. We thank X. Zhang, D. Skibbe, X. Chen, J. Xu, K. White, T. Zhu, W. Cao, R. Quadt, B. Anindya, L. Shi, E. Dunder, I. Jepsen, G. Wu and B. Zhang for leadership and project guidance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.L. and T.K. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. K.Y. managed plant care in the greenhouse, including seed increase and outcrossing. J.W. developed the genotyping strategy and conducted T2/F1 genotyping and KASP check. C.L. did the vector design and construction. H.G. and Y.W. performed the wheat transformation. H.Z. and J.L. sequenced T0/T1 genotypes. D.L. and J.L. performed pollen staining, stomata check and flower structure phenotyping, and R.C. performed the qRT–PCR of the three homoeologs of TaCENH3α and TaCENH3β in various tissues. T.L. analyzed histone modification sites. Q.Q., W.W., R.R. and X.Z. provided technique suggestions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Lv or Tim Kelliher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A patent covering the information in this manuscript was submitted on 2 October 2018.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4 and Tables 1–7

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, J., Yu, K., Wei, J. et al. Generation of paternal haploids in wheat by genome editing of the centromeric histone CENH3. Nat Biotechnol 38, 1397–1401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0728-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0728-4

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research