Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Growth of biotech clusters over several decades through pioneering, variety and entrepreneurial science

Nature Biotechnology volume 42, pages 20–25 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Biotechnology (biotech) clusters have evolved over time. Being a top biotech region in the early years 1978–1990 still positively correlates with the cluster’s biotech strength decades later. An entrepreneurial orientation of scientific actors as well as a variety of networks with partners outside the cluster both contribute to sustained biotech activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The evolution of triadic patent families, 1978–2015.
Fig. 2: Average value of share of company-owned patents and share of anchor tenant.

References

  1. Feldman, M. P. J. Comp. Policy Anal. 2, 345–361 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergquist, K., Fink, C. & Raffo, J. Identifying and ranking the world’s largest clusters of inventive activity. Economic Research Working Paper No. 34, WIPO Global Innovation Index (WIPO, 2017).

  3. Friedrichs, S. Report on statistics and indicators of biotechnology and nanotechnology. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper 2018/06, https://doi.org/10.1787/3c70afa7-en (OECD, 2018).

  4. Befort, N. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 153, 119923 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooke, P. Camb. J. Econ. 29, 325–341 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter, M. E. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76, 77–90 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Looy, B., Debackere, K. & Andries, P. R & D Manag. 3, 209–229 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Breznitz, D. Innovation in Real Places (Oxford Univ. Press, 2021).

  9. Hodgson, J. & Schreiber-Gregory, D. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 821–828 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Audretsch, D. & Feldman, M. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 253–273 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. & Wright, M. Res. Policy 40, 1045–1057 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vlaisavljevic, V., Medina, C. C. & Van Looy, B. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 155, 119987 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K. & Luwel, M. Scientometrics 58, 241–263 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magerman, T., Van Looy, B. & Debackere, K. Res. Policy 44, 1702–1713 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pavitt, K. Scientometrics 7, 77–99 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griliches, Z. J. Econ. Lit. 28, 1661–1707 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. Q. J. Econ. 108, 577–598 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gambardella, A. Markets for Technology (MIT Press, 2000).

  19. Criscuolo, P. Scientometrics 66, 23–41 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. OECD Patent Statistics. Patent by Main Technology and by International Patent Classification (IPC), Edition 2018 (OECD, 2018).

  21. Eurostat. Patent Statistics at Eurostat: Methods for Regionalisation, Sector Allocation and Name Harmonisation (European Union, 2011).

  22. Kers, J. G., Van Burg, E., Stoop, T. & Cornel, M. C. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 22, 1155–1159 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Beuzekom, B. & Arundel, A. OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009 (OECD, 2009).

  24. Hall, B., Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. Rand 36, 16–38 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Suarez, F. & Lanzolla, G. Harv. Bus. Rev. 83(121–127), 134 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. Strateg. Manag. J. 9, 41–58 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. & Brewer, M. B. Am. Econ. Rev. 88, 290–306, http://www.jstor.org/stable/116831 (1998).

  28. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. & Maskel, P. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28, 31–56 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lecocq, C. & Van Looy, B. Ind. Corp. Change 25, 671–688 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Allen, T. J. Managing the Flow of Technology (MIT Press, 1977).

  31. Burt, R. S. Structural Holes (Univ. Chicago Press, 1992).

  32. Feldman, M., Francis, J. & Bercovitz, J. Reg. Stud. 39, 129–141 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Audretsch, D. B. Small Bus. Econ. 17, 3–15 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooke, P. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 7, 117–139 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Xiao Yan Song for her support and guidance when developing relevant patent indicators. We express our gratitude to ECOOM STORE for supporting and funding this line of research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ECOOM, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Bart Van Looy, Grabowska Marcelina & Koenraad Debackere

  2. Managerial Economics, Strategy and Innovation, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Bart Van Looy & Koenraad Debackere

  3. Business Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Vesna Vlaisavljevic

  4. Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organization, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Catherine Lecocq

Authors
  1. Bart Van Looy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grabowska Marcelina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vesna Vlaisavljevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catherine Lecocq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Koenraad Debackere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: B.V.L., C.L.¸ V.V., K.D.B. Methodology: C.L., M.G., V.V., B.V.L. Formal analysis: M.G., C.L. and B.V.L. Writing—original draft: BVL, MG, VV. Writing — review and editing: C.L., K.D.B., V.V., M.G., B.V.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bart Van Looy.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biotechnology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Looy, B., Grabowska, M., Vlaisavljevic, V. et al. Growth of biotech clusters over several decades through pioneering, variety and entrepreneurial science. Nat Biotechnol 42, 20–25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02062-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02062-6

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing