Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Briefing
  • Published:

Identifying biases in the global placement of river gauges

A global analysis of stream gauges reveals that they are predominantly installed on large, perennially flowing and human-impacted rivers. The current placement of stream gauges does not provide observations that represent the wide variety of global rivers, resulting in a biased dataset, which has broad implications for ecology, hydrology, and freshwater management.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Identifying priority regions for stream gauge installation.

References

  1. Vörösmarty, C. et al. Global water data: a newly endangered species. Eos 82, 54–58 (2001). A commentary that discusses the value of high-quality and long-term hydrological datasets.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deweber, J. T. et al. Importance of understanding landscape biases in USGS gage locations: implications and solutions for managers. Fisheries 39, 155–163 (2014). This paper reports biases in the landscape representation of the US Geological Survey stream gauge network.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dobrushin, R. L. Prescribing a system of random variables by conditional distributions. Theory Probab. Appl. 15, 458–486 (1970). This paper describes the Wasserstein distance, a statistical approach to comparing two probability distributions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruhi, A., Messager, M. L. & Olden, J. D. Tracking the pulse of the Earth’s fresh waters. Nat. Sustain. 1, 198–203 (2018). This paper reports a decline in hydrological monitoring and proposes solutions for sustainable water management in the future.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This is a summary of: Krabbenhoft, C. A. et al. Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00873-0 (2022).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Identifying biases in the global placement of river gauges. Nat Sustain 5, 561–562 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00878-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00878-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene