Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 383 Issue 6603, 31 October 1996

Opinion

  • Premature release of scientific results to the public is against the interests of scientists, journalists and the public. The use of embargoed press releases is beneficial, and helps the quality of coverage of science in the media.

    Opinion

    Advertisement

  • Climatological lobbyists have given scepticism a bad name, and more credible criticism is at risk of suppression.

    Opinion
Top of page ⤴

News

Top of page ⤴

News in Brief

Top of page ⤴

Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

News & Views

Top of page ⤴

Scientific Correspondence

Top of page ⤴

Autumn Books

Top of page ⤴

Review Article

Top of page ⤴

Article

Top of page ⤴

Letter

Top of page ⤴

Guide to Authors

Top of page ⤴
Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links