Sir,
Black occlusive intraocular lenses (IOLs) are an effective and reversible surgical treatment for intractable diplopia unresponsive to conventional therapy.1
It has recently been established that occlusive IOLs have variable light-blocking properties in vitro, with some IOLs allowing the passage of infrared light.2, 3 The ability for posterior segment visualisation with light imaging modalities is advantageous; however, patient postoperative satisfaction can be compromised.
This case demonstrates the superior ability of black Artisan iris claw IOL to completely occlude infrared light transmitted by optical coherence topography (OCT) and resolve diplopia compared to black Morcher polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) posterior chamber IOL in a clinical setting.
Case report
A 54-year-old man had intractable diplopia despite multiple operations to his right eye, including sub-macular translocation surgery to correct retinal folds following retinal detachment surgery. He subsequently had cataract extraction and glaucoma tube drainage surgery for secondary raised intraocular pressure.
Visual acuity was 6/36 OD and 6/4 OS, with confusion not amenable to prismatic correction. The patient did not tolerate occlusive contact lenses, and after counselling his preference was for occlusive IOL.
As he was pseudophakic, a black Morcher PMMA IOL was inserted ‘piggy back’ on his existing clear IOL in the capsular bag using a modified black on clear technique4 (Figure 1a).
Postoperatively, his visual confusion improved but some symptoms persisted. A ‘ghost image’ was still visible, which interfered with daily activities. Posterior segment imaging with OCT demonstrated transmission of infrared light through the Morcher IOL, albeit with degraded images (Figure 1b). Subsequent implantation of an occlusive Artisan IOL resolved the patient’s symptoms and prevented further transmission of infrared light by OCT (Figures 2a and b).
Comment
Artisan iris claw occlusive IOL has superior light-blocking properties compared with Morcher PMMA occlusive IOL. This has implications for patient satisfaction following surgery. Artisan IOL is associated with low complication rates5 and can be implanted to the posterior surface of the iris to give a better cosmetic appearance. Patients should however be counselled about the inability to monitor the posterior segment with light imaging modalities.
References
Wong SC, Islam N, Ficker L . Black occlusive IOLs. Ophthalmology 2007; 114 (12): 2365.
Yusuf IH, Peirson SN, Patel CK . Occlusive IOLs for intractable diplopia demonstrate novel near-infrared window of transmission for SLO/OCT imaging and posterior segment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 3737–3743.
Yusuf IH, Peirson SN, Patel CK . Inability to perform posterior segment monitoring by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy or optical coherence tomography with some occlusive intraocular lenses in clinical use. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38 (3): 513–518.
Byard SD, Lee RM, Lam FC, Simpson AR, Liu CS . Black on clear piggyback technique for a black occlusive intraocular device in intractable diplopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38 (1): 5–7.
Hassaballa MA, Macky TA . Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs. Visian ICL. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25 (10): 1365–1370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shonibare, O., Lochhead, J. ‘Double occlusion’: black Artisan iris claw intraocular lens insertion following failed occlusion treatment for intractable diplopia. Eye 28, 768–769 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.68
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.68
This article is cited by
-
Response to ‘Opaque intraocular lens implantation’
Eye (2015)
-
Primary black intraocular lens selection
Eye (2014)