Introduction

Carbon dioxide (CO2) can dissolve into a free volume of amorphous polymers because of the low viscosity and/or high diffusivity of CO2.1 The dissolved CO2 causes a plasticization effect such as dilation,2 depression of glass transition temperature3, 4 and decrease in viscosity.5 Hence, for example, CO2 is used as a plasticizer in polymer processing. The plasticization effect on amorphous polymers has been verified in terms of molecular motion by using in situ dielectric relaxation measurement under CO2; that is, the dielectric relaxation spectrum for the amorphous chain (αa relaxation) shifts to a higher frequency by pressurized CO2, suggesting that the molecular motion of the amorphous chain is accelerated by the plasticization effect of CO2.6, 7

In crystalline polymers, a crystalline region coexists with an amorphous one. The packing of the chain in the crystalline region (crystalline chain) is tight in crystalline polymers, whereas the chain is randomly arranged and free volume exists in amorphous polymers. Hence, the sorption and solubility of CO2 into crystalline polymers are much smaller than those of amorphous polymers, suggesting that CO2 is insoluble in the crystalline region.3, 8 Because CO2 is insoluble in the crystalline region, whereas it dissolves in the amorphous region, dissolved CO2 in the molten state is excluded from the crystal growth front during crystallization. Owing to the exclusion, characteristic porous structures such as layered and rod-like ones are obtained when the bubbles nucleate and grow by supersaturation of the excluded CO2 in the constrained intercrystalline amorphous region.9 On the other hand, a decline in melting temperature is observed under CO2 in several crystalline polymers, suggesting the plasticization effect of CO2 on the crystalline chain.4, 10, 11 Thus, the solubility and plasticization effects of CO2 on the crystalline chain are controversial. However, thus far, the solubility of CO2 in the crystalline chain has not been clarified on a molecular scale.

If CO2 is dissolved in the crystalline region, the molecular motion of the crystalline chain should be accelerated by its plasticization effect. Dielectric relaxation measurement is a powerful tool to estimate the molecular motion of the crystalline chain under CO2. In this paper, we investigate the molecular motion of the crystalline chain by in situ dielectric relaxation measurement of a crystalline polymer under CO2 at various pressures. Here, we chose poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) as the crystalline polymer because the decline in its melting temperature can be observed under CO2 11 and the dielectric relaxation spectra of the crystalline chain (αc relaxation) are seen near 120 °C under air at ambient pressure.12, 13 The dissolution of CO2 in the crystalline region is discussed in terms of the molecular motion of the crystalline chain.

Experimental procedure

The PVDF powder used in this study was supplied by Kureha Chemical Industry Co., Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (KF-1000, Mw=250 000). To obtain a crystallized film specimen with a thickness of 0.4 mm, the PVDF powder was compression molded between two cover glasses at 200 °C for 5 min, and then gradually cooled to room temperature.

In situ dielectric relaxation measurement under high-pressure CO2 was taken using a specially designed custom-made high-pressure cell constructed of stainless steel with an inner volume of 300 ml equipped with two sapphire windows for through view, as schematically shown in Figure 1. The capacitors used for the dielectric relaxation measurement consisted of two indium tin oxide plates. The upper capacitor was hung from a shaft and the lower one was fixed at the lower part of the cell. As the magnet was attached at the upper end of the shaft in a hollow bolt and was held by a magnetic nut on the hollow bolt with screw thread, the upper capacitor could be moved up or down, thereby moving the shaft by rotating the magnetic nut on the hollow bolt. The film specimen was placed on the lower capacitor and high-pressure CO2 was injected into the cell at room temperature. After the specimen was kept in position for 2 h to dissolve CO2 in the specimen, the upper capacitor was moved downward until it adhered to the specimen as viewed through the sapphire window. Here, the capacitors were separated by a polyimide spacer of 0.4 mm to determine the thickness of the specimen. The temperature was then raised to 120 °C. The pressure of CO2 was kept constant during the heating process using a back pressure regulator. Dielectric measurements were performed with a Solartron 1260 Impedance/Gain-Phase Analyzer equipped with an impedance transformer (SI 1296 Dielectric Interface, Solartron, Farnborough, UK) under CO2 pressure up to 10 MPa at a frequency, f, ranging from 10−1 to 107 Hz. The angular frequency, ω, was obtained by ω=2πf.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of the instrumental setup for in situ dielectric relaxation measurement.

Results and discussion

Figure 2 shows the angular frequency, ω, dependence of the dielectric loss, ɛ″, of the crystallized PVDF at 120 °C under various CO2 pressures, PCO2. A peak is detected near 105 s−1 and a broad shoulder is observed near 102 s−1. The peak near 105 s−1 is assigned to the crystalline chain relaxation (αc relaxation).12, 13 As the αc relaxation originates from rotating and twisting with a small lengthwise translation of the crystalline chain,14, 15 this peak is expected to shift to a higher frequency when the crystalline chain motion is accelerated by dissolving CO2 in the crystalline region. On the other hand, the shoulder near 102 s−1 is assigned to the relaxation of the interfacial polarization caused by trapping charge carriers at the crystal–amorphous interphase because of the permittivity difference between the amorphous and crystalline regions.16, 17 A steep upturn with a straight line of slope −1 is seen at a low frequency below 102 s−1. The steep upturn is assigned to ionic conductivity caused by the mobility of ionic impurities in the amorphous region.2, 18

Figure 2
figure 2

Frequency dependence of dielectric loss ɛ″. (a) Crystallized PVDF under various CO2 pressures at a temperature of 120 °C. The solid lines were obtained by the fitting procedure shown in (b). (b) Crystallized PVDF under air at ambient pressure (0.1 MPa) at a temperature of 120 °C. The curve was fitted by Equation (1) for αc relaxation and interfacial polarization, and by Equation (2) for ionic conductivity.

As shown in Figure 2b, the ɛ″ (ω) curve in Figure 2a can easily be resolved into three parts. The peak for the αc relaxation and the shoulder for the relaxation of the interfacial polarization are described by the Havriliak–Negami equation:16

where ɛ* is the complex dielectric permittivity; ɛ*=ɛ′–″, ɛ is the limiting high-frequency permittivity; τj is the relaxation time of the jth process; (Δɛ)j is the dielectric strength of the jth process; and αj and βj are the parameters describing the broadening and asymmetry of the jth relaxation time distribution. The upturn for the ionic conductivity is described by

where σionic is the ionic conductivity and ɛ0 is the permittivity of vacuum (8.854 pFm−1).

Figure 3 shows the peaks for αc relaxation and interfacial polarization at various CO2 pressures that are obtained from Figure 2 using Equations (1) and (2). It was found that the shape and peak maximum for the αc relaxation did not change, although pressurized CO2 was applied up to 10 MPa (Figure 3a). As shown in Figure 4, the frequency of the peak maximum for the αc relaxation obtained from Figure 3a, ωmax(αc), is almost constant near 105 s−1 with CO2 pressure. The constant ωmax (αc) with CO2 pressure indicates that the molecular motion of the crystalline chain is not accelerated by applying pressurized CO2. This result is quite different from that observed in amorphous polymers in which accelerated chain motion by pressurized CO2 is suggested, that is, the peak maximum for the amorphous chain motion (αa relaxation) shifts to a higher frequency by several orders of magnitude by applying pressurized CO2 up to a few MPa.6, 7 As the molecular motion of the crystalline chain is not accelerated by applying pressurized CO2, CO2 is not dissolved inside the crystalline region because of the tight chain packing in the crystalline region. Thus, the plasticization effect of CO2 is not seen in terms of the molecular motion of the crystalline chain, whereas the decline in melting temperature under CO2 is suggested. The decline in melting temperature under CO2 might not be attributed to the accelerated crystalline chain motion inside the crystalline region but to the interaction between CO2 and the PVDF chain near the surface of the crystalline region. Owing to the interaction near the surface, the surface free energy increases and then the melting temperature declines, as demonstrated by Zhang and Handa.4

Figure 3
figure 3

Frequency dependence of the dielectric loss of (a) αc relaxation and (b) interfacial polarization in the crystallized PVDF under various CO2 pressures at a temperature of 120 °C.

Figure 4
figure 4

Pressure dependence of the frequency of the peak maximum of the dielectric loss of αc relaxation and interfacial polarization in crystallized PVDF under CO2 at a temperature of 120 °C.

As shown in Figure 3b, the peak for interfacial polarization shifts to a higher frequency and the strength of the peak increases with increasing CO2 pressure. The frequency of the peak maximum obtained from Figure 3b, ωmax (IP), increases with increasing CO2 pressure (Figure 4). Assuming that the crystalline region is spherical with dielectric constant ɛ2 and conductivity σ2, and is dispersed in a matrix of the amorphous region with dielectric constant ɛ1 and conductivity σ1, the relaxation time of the interfacial polarization, τMWS, is given by the Maxwell–Wagner–Sillars equation:17

As CO2 molecules are not dissolved in the crystalline region, as demonstrated above, ɛ2 and σ2 are unchanged with CO2 pressure. In contrast, CO2 molecules can dissolve in the amorphous region and the chain mobility in that region is accelerated with increasing CO2 pressure. The increase in the upturn with increasing CO2 pressure shown at the low frequency region in Figure 2a suggests an increase in ionic conductivity due to an increase in the mobility of ionic impurities associated with increased chain mobility in the amorphous region. As conductivity increases with increasing chain mobility, σ1 becomes larger as the amount of dissolved CO2 in the amorphous region increases with increasing CO2 pressure. In contrast, the dielectric constant of PVDF is much higher than that of CO2; that is, the relative permittivity of PVDF is 1219 and that of CO2 at 100 °C is 1.19 under pressures below 15 MPa.20 Hence, ɛ1 becomes smaller as the amount of dissolved CO2 in the amorphous region increases with increasing CO2 pressure. Thus, σ1 increases, whereas ɛ1 decreases because of the dissolved CO2 in the amorphous region. The increase in σ1 and the decrease in ɛ1 yield a decrease in τMWS in Equation (3). The fact that ωmax (IP) is the inverse of τMWS might explain the increase in ωmax (IP) with increasing CO2 pressure, as shown in Figures 3b and 4.

Conclusion

We found by in situ dielectric relaxation measurement that the shape and frequency of the peak maximum for the αc relaxation of the crystallized PVDF did not change, although pressurized CO2 was applied up to 10 MPa. The result suggests that CO2 is not dissolved inside the crystalline region and the crystalline chain motion is not accelerated under CO2. On the other hand, the frequency of the peak maximum for interfacial polarization shifted to a higher frequency with increasing CO2 pressure because of a decrease in the dielectric constant and an increase in the conductivity in the amorphous region with an increase in the amount of dissolved CO2 in the amorphous region.