To the Editor:
Recent efforts in understanding the epitranscriptome have shown that a diverse set of modifications to RNA represent a new pervasive mechanism of gene regulation, with roles in stem cell homeostasis and disease. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an evolutionarily conserved RNA modification and one of the most abundant found on polyadenylated RNA [1, 2]. The modification is predominantly deposited on mRNA by the METTL3/METTL14 methyltransferase complex [3, 4]. The majority of the reported phenotypes connected to METTL3/METTL14 function have so far utilised genetic knock-down or knock-out approaches which have been proven fairly pleiotropic, mainly due to the significant negative impact on the general m6A complex [3, 4]. Lack of reagents and strategies to selectively block the catalytic activity of METTL3 without affecting any of its other functions and interactions has hindered investigation of catalysis-specific METTL3 activity. We recently showed that pharmacological inhibition of the catalytic activity of METTL3, using the first-in-class small molecule STM2457, is a novel therapeutic strategy against acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) [5]. While no toxicity or long-term effects on normal blood counts were observed after in vivo pharmacological inhibition using STM2457, the potential impact of the isolated catalytic inhibition of METTL3 on normal haematopoiesis remained elusive. To address this, here we utilize a high-resolution single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) approach to understand: 1) the effect of catalytic inhibition of METTL3 on different lineages within normal haematopoiesis and 2) its specific impact on haematopoietic stem cell fate decisions in vivo.
To investigate the above, we initially performed in vivo studies using wild-type CB57BL/6 N mice treated daily with either vehicle or 50 mg/kg of STM2457 over the course of 2 weeks (Fig. S1A). We confirmed effective and selective in vivo catalytic inhibition of METTL3 as total m6A modification levels on RNA were significantly reduced after treatment with STM2457 while no changes were detected on m62A RNA modification levels (Fig. 1A). Consistent with previous reports using METTL3 knock-out (KO) mouse models [6,7,8], flow cytometric analysis of the harvested bone marrow from the 2 treated cohorts demonstrated expansion of the haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) compartment of STM2457-treated mice, with increased numbers of lineage- c-kit+ Sca1+ (LSK) and LSK CD150 + CD48- HSCs (Figs. 1B and S1B).
To reveal gene expression changes across the haematopoietic stem/progenitor landscape following pharmacological inhibition of METTL3, we performed scRNA-seq on lineage negative, kit positive (LK) haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from 3 mice treated with STM2457 and 4 vehicle-treated controls (Table S1). After filtering, 52,424 single-cell transcriptomes were visualised in an integrated universal manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) embedding (Figs. 1C and S1C–G).
Differential gene expression between treated and untreated conditions identified 152 upregulated and 89 downregulated genes (Table S2). Consistent with the previously identified aberrant stabilization of double-stranded RNA molecules following conditional METTL3 KO [8], gene set enrichment analysis identified upregulated inflammatory pathways and cytokine response, while heme biosynthesis was the most significantly downregulated term (Fig. S2A). Taking the inflammatory response to virus signature as a surrogate for successful catalytic inhibition of METTL3, the genes in this signature (GO:0051607) were used to compute a ’defense to virus’ score (Fig. S2B). This was significantly upregulated across all clusters and cell types of the haematopoietic stem and progenitor compartment in STM2457-treated compared to vehicle-treated, indicating that in all cell types, successful inhibition of METTL3 induced a double-stranded RNA response through aberrant transcript stabilization.
To define tissue-level effects of METTL3 inhibition in detail, we performed differential cell abundance testing (Fig. 1D). In contrast to reports using METTL3 KO mouse models [6,7,8], this analysis demonstrated no significant perturbation in cell numbers in the least-committed progenitors, including HSCs. The discordance between phenotypic and transcriptional HSC abundance likely reflects inflammation-related upregulation of phenotypic markers including Sca1 in the inhibitor-treated bone marrow (Fig. S1C). The most marked difference in cellular abundance was a significant reduction in erythroid progenitors, occurring downstream of megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors (MEPs), and accompanied by an increase in the abundance of neutrophil progenitors. The lineage-specificity of these findings is in contrast with published reports of scRNA-seq analyses in METTL3 KO mouse models [6], which have demonstrated more widespread depletion in lineage-primed progenitors and mature cell types, potentially due to catalytic-independent effects originating from METTL3 protein loss. The results presented here suggest that pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 induces lineage bias in the earliest haematopoietic progenitors.
To ascertain the level at which lineage bias originates, we performed cell fate probability analysis with CellRank [9] which estimates the probability of a cell’s commitment to each of the seven major haematopoietic lineages (neutrophil, monocyte, lymphoid, erythroid, megakaryocyte, basophil and mast cell). In keeping with the cell abundance changes, cell fate probability analysis identified increased neutrophil fate probability and decreased erythroid fate probability (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, while the difference in erythroid fate was most marked at the level of MEPs (Fig. 2A), (mean erythroid fate probability 0.46 in STM2457-treated vs 0.56 in Vehicle-treated, p = 1.65e−52), it was also detectable in the HSC cluster (Fig. 2A) (mean erythroid probability 0.12 vs 0.15, p = 9.54e−86, mean neutrophil probability 0.16 vs 0.12, p = 3.25e−62). These results are consistent with a model whereby cell abundance changes induced by isolated catalytic inhibition of METTL3 reflect alterations in cell fate at the level of the least committed progenitors.
To identify potential molecular correlates of altered cell fate, we defined trajectories from HSCs to the seven lineages described above and identified dynamic gene expression along a given trajectory using tradeSeq [10]. Comparing gene expression patterns along the neutrophil trajectory identified 51 genes whose expression dynamics significantly differed in the STM2457-treated cohort (Table S3), including participants in dsRNA and antiviral response (Ifitm1, Cybb, Oasl2, Ffar2, Cd48). Among these genes, the neutrophil transcription factor Cebpd was upregulated in the STM2457-treated neutrophil trajectory (Fig. 2B) while the monocyte transcription factor Irf8 was significantly downregulated at the potential branchpoint with the monocytic lineage (Fig. 2B). In the erythroid trajectory 45 genes were identified as dynamically expressed (Table S3) including members of dsRNA-sensing pathways (Oas2, Oas3, Zbp, Ddx60) and erythropoietin response genes (Ccnd2, Isg15, Socs3).
Of note, cell cycle analysis demonstrated a higher proportion of STM2457-treated cells in G1 phase, indicating an increase in quiescence across the entire HSPC compartment in the STM2457-treated cohort (Figs. 2C and S2C and S3A–O). The inflammatory response gene Irf7, upregulated along the erythroid trajectory, (Fig. S2D) has been linked to the regulation of quiescence in stress haematopoiesis [11]. Ifitm1, also upregulated along the erythroid trajectory (Figure S2D), is constitutively expressed in HSCs, interferon-induced in erythroid progenitors [12] and is a negative regulator of proliferation [13]. These findings suggest that cell cycle dysregulation may contribute to erythroid progenitor deficiency.
Erythrocytes are the most abundant cells in the body and their generation is critically coupled to cell cycle. The progression of committed erythroid progenitors into terminal differentiation is dependent on progression through S phase [14]. In STM2457-treated samples, early progenitors in the erythroid trajectory were more quiescent, with a significantly higher proportion of cells in G1 phase and a reduction in the fraction of cells progressing into S phase as differentiation proceeds (Figs. 2C and S3I–O). Cell-cycle genes dysregulated in this trajectory included Hist1h2ap (Fig. 2D), a nucleosomal core protein whose expression is cell-cycle dependent [15] and Ccnd2 (Fig. 2D), required for G1/S transition, whose downregulation has been reported to accompany S phase progression and terminal erythroid differentiation [14]. Notably, peripheral blood counts corroborated our observations on the negative impact on erythropoiesis. In the STM2457-treated cohort significantly lower haemoglobin and red blood cell counts (RBC) were accompanied by significantly higher platelets, while total white blood cell counts (WBC) remained largely unaffected (Fig. S2E).
Taken together, our study provides a high-resolution cellular mapping of changes to normal haemopoiesis after catalytic-specific inhibition of the m6A writer METTL3 using STM2457. Our results indicate that pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 i) has no impact on the abundance of the least committed progenitors including HSCs, ii) induces gene expression changes consistent with a dsRNA response that is likely to contribute to the observed bias of haematopoiesis towards neutrophil progenitors, with lineage bias and gene expression changes already present in the HSC compartment and iii) causes significant alterations in erythroid differentiation and maturation through aberrant cell cycle regulation. These data provide insights into at least two molecular processes underlying the development of anaemia following isolated catalytic inhibition of METTL3. While we have previously shown that haematopoietic effects induced by STM2457 are transient and rapidly reversible [5], the above observations remain relevant to current high-profile translational efforts with METTL3 small molecule inhibitors currently in clinical development (Phase 1). Whilst our high-resolution data suggest milder, more nuanced and manageable effects of pharmacological METTL3 inhibition on normal haematopoiesis than those observed in METTL3 KO studies, it will nevertheless be important to monitor all haematopoietic parameters in patients treated with METTL3 inhibitors, some of which may potentially act as biomarkers of response.
Data availability
The scRNA-seq datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available under the GEO accession number: GSE228562.
References
Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485:201–6.
Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive Analysis of mRNA Methylation Reveals Enrichment in 3′ UTRs and near Stop Codons. Cell. 2012;149:1635–46.
Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, et al. A METTL3–METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:93–5.
Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505:117–20.
Yankova E, Blackaby W, Albertella M, Rak J, De Braekeleer E, Tsagkogeorga G, et al. Small molecule inhibition of METTL3 as a strategy against myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2021. Accessed 5 May 2021. http://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03536-w
Cheng Y, Luo H, Izzo F, Pickering BF, Nguyen D, Myers R, et al. m6A RNA Methylation Maintains Hematopoietic Stem Cell Identity and Symmetric Commitment. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1703–16.
Lee H, Bao S, Qian Y, Geula S, Leslie J, Zhang C, et al. Stage-specific requirement for Mettl3 -dependent m 6 A mRNA methylation during haematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:700–9.
Gao Y, Vasic R, Song Y, Teng R, Liu C, Gbyli R, et al. m6A Modification Prevents Formation of Endogenous Double-Stranded RNAs and Deleterious Innate Immune Responses during Hematopoietic Development. Immunity. 2020;52:1007–21.
Lange M, Bergen V, Klein M, Setty M, Reuter B, Bakhti M, et al. CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping. Nat Methods. 2022;19:159–70.
Van den Berge K, Roux de Bézieux H, Street K, Saelens W, Cannoodt R, Saeys Y, et al. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1201.
Chen YY, Liu YF, Liu YD, Deng XH, Zhou J. IRF7 suppresses hematopoietic regeneration under stress via CXCR4. Stem Cells. 2021;39:183–95.
Wu X, Thi VLD, Huang Y, Billerbeck E, Saha D, Hoffmann HH, et al. Intrinsic Immunity Shapes Viral Resistance of Stem Cells. Cell. 2018;172:423–38.
Yang G, Xu Y, Chen X, Hu G. IFITM1 plays an essential role in the antiproliferative action of interferon-γ. Oncogene. 2007;26:594–603.
Tusi BK, Wolock SL, Weinreb C, Hwang Y, Hidalgo D, Zilionis R, et al. Population snapshots predict early haematopoietic and erythroid hierarchies. Nature. 2018;555:54–60.
Marzluff WF, Gongidi P, Woods KR, Jin J, Maltais LJ. The Human and Mouse Replication-Dependent Histone Genes. Genomics. 2002;80:487–98.
Acknowledgements
KT and EY were supported by Wellcome Trust (grants RG94424, RG83195, G106133) and UKRI Medical Research Council (grant RG83195). KT and ME were supported by Leukaemia UK (grants G108148 and G117699). GSV was supported by Cancer Research UK (Senior Cancer Fellowship, grant no. C22324/A23015). Work in the Göttgens Laboratory is funded by grants from Wellcome (206328/Z/17/Z); Blood Cancer UK (18002); Cancer Research UK (C1163/A21762); UKRI Medical Research Council (G112574); and core support grants by the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre (C49940/A25117); and by the Wellcome Trust (203151/Z/16/Z) and the UKRI Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17230). KS is supported by Wellcome (204017/Z/16/Z). TI is supported by the Funai Foundation for Information Technology. The authors thank Reiner Schulte, Chiara Cossetti and Gabriela Grondys-Kotarba from the Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Flow Cytometry Core facility for their assistance with cell sorting. We would also like to thank the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute Genomics Core Facility for performing high-throughput sequencing. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KT and BG conceived the study; KT, EY and NAW conducted chemical and biochemical experiments. KT, EY, JR, MG, and ME performed mouse experiments. KS, and NKW performed scRNA-seq experiments. KS, MSV, TI, IK, MB and RH performed bioinformatics analyses with help and supervision from NKW, BG, and KT. OR and GSV helped with data analysis, interpretation and direction. KT, KS, EY, NKW and BG wrote the manuscript with help from all authors. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
NAW and OR are employees of Storm Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK. KT is a shareholder of and has received research funding from Storm Therapeutics Ltd.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sturgess, K., Yankova, E., Vijayabaskar, M.S. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of METTL3 impacts specific haematopoietic lineages. Leukemia 37, 2133–2137 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01965-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01965-2