Introduction

Bilirubin is a compound produced by the catabolism of heme. It is a normal product of the breakdown of hemoglobin from red blood cells that is further catabolized and excreted. Accumulation of bilirubin can become neurotoxic as is often the case in premature infants.1 In the United States, the amount of total serum bilirubin (the sum of free bilirubin, albumin-bound bilirubin, and bilirubin conjugated to glucuronic acid) exceeds concentrations of concern in almost all preterm neonates <35 weeks gestation, a condition known as hyperbilirubinemia.2 Only free bilirubin can cross the blood–brain barrier and accumulate in the brain, causing injury.3 The primary brain areas affected by bilirubin in the perinatal phase are the globus pallidus, hippocampus, brainstem auditory nuclei, and cerebellum.1 As a result, premature infants are particularly susceptible to dystonia and deafness associated with hyperbilirubinemia.4 Neurotoxicity can occur with lower levels of total serum bilirubin in preterm compared to term infants.5 Complicating the diagnosis and implementation of therapeutic intervention is the fact that measuring levels of bilirubin in serum does not reliably predict the likelihood of bilirubin-induced neurotoxicity.3

In premature infants, acute bilirubin neurotoxicity may occur without obvious clinical symptoms.1 Over time, the condition can progress to chronic symptoms, including motor incoordination, learning disabilities, and balance disorders.6 Despite the overwhelming incidence of hyperbilirubinemia in premature infants, rodent models have focused on term equivalent ages (e.g., postnatal day (P) 16).7 The Gunn rat (GR) is homozygous (jj) for a mutation in uridine diphosphate-glucuronylsyl transferase 1 (UGT1) and has elevated concentrations of circulating bilirubin.8 Heterozygous littermates (Nj) have reduced UGT1 (~50% of wild type), do not develop hyperbilirubinemia, and serve as controls.9 The majority of studies have induced acute bilirubin encephalopathy by administration of sulfadimethoxine (sulfa) on P16,7,9,10 a model of term newborn hyperbilirubinemia. To model preterm (24–29 weeks of gestation) human infants, we administered sulfa to P5 GR pups.11 We hypothesize that the Nj GR pups injected with sulfa on P5 will not experience acute bilirubin encephalopathy. However, we predict that jj GR pups injected with sulfa on P5 will experience long-term cerebellar sequelae.

Methods

GRs were obtained from the Rat Resource & Research Center and a breeding colony was established at the University of Maryland. All breeding and experimental procedures were approved by the University of Maryland Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Litters are the product of jj male mated with Nj females. Rats were pair housed, one female and one male. Females were checked daily for signs of a mucus plug. The day a plug was observed was designated as gestational day 0 (G0). The day of birth was designated P0. On P1, pups were genotyped for jj or Nj status. Each pup of a litter is identified as one of the four groups: male/female and Nj/jj. Pups of the same sex and genotype were assigned to the different treatment groups using randomly generated numbers in Microsoft Excel. Pups were injected intraperitoneally with either 200 mg/kg of sulfa on P5 or an equivalent volume of saline. This categorization results in 8 groups: male/female Nj saline, male/female Nj sulfa, male/female jj saline, male/female jj sulfa.

Immediate effects

Pups were video-recorded immediately following injection. Videos were scored for movement and nursing.

Ultrasonic vocalization (USV)

On P6, the latency and number of USVs was measured. An ultrasonic detector with a microphone was set 20 cm above the test cage. The output was recorded using Avisoft (Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin, Germany). Each pup was briefly removed from the dam and put in the right corner of the test cage for a 5-min test session. Three tests were conducted for each pup with 20 min between tests. Pups were returned to the dam between tests. Audio data were subsequently played back and the latency to the first vocalization and the number of USV at 40 kHz were recorded. The average of the three tests was calculated.

Negative geotaxis

Testing was conducted on P10. Pups were placed on a plane inclined at an angle of 45 degree. The testing surface was covered with a polypropylene mesh with 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm grids. The trials started with pups placed on the incline with their heads on the lowest part of the incline. The time taken to position themselves with their head at the highest part of the incline was measured. Each pup was tested three times with 20 min between tests. Pups were returned to the dam between tests. The average of the three tests was calculated.

Righting reflex

Testing was conducted on P10. Rat pups were gently placed on their back. Time taken to flip over onto their stomach was measured. Each pup was tested three times with 20 min between tests. Pups were returned to the dam between tests. The time for each test was averaged for each pup.

Rotarod

On P28–P30, performance on an accelerating rotarod was tested. Pups were placed on a horizontally oriented, rotating cylinder (Roto-Rod series 8, IITC Life Science Inc, CA) suspended 15 cm above the bottom of the apparatus, which is low enough not to injure the animal but high enough to induce avoidance of fall. The rotarod is mechanically driven at an accelerating speed of 5 rpm to a maximum speed of 45 rpm within 100 s of initiation of the test. A soft padded surface was placed at the base of the apparatus to cushion falls. The length of time that each pup was able to remain on the rotating rod was measured each day for 3 days. The average time was calculated for the 3 days.

Cerebellar weights

Pups were euthanized on P30. The cerebellum was dissected free and weighed.

Statistical analysis

Mixed factor analysis of variance with Genotype2 and sulfa treatment2 as between-group factors was conducted for each dependent variable: (1) Pup weight, (2) Latency to first vocalization, (3) Number of USVs, (4) Negative geotaxis performance, (5) Righting reflex, (6) Rotarod performance, and (7) Cerebellar weight. When the Genotype and sulfa interaction did not reach significance, Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to determine whether rats treated with sulfa differ from rats treated with saline for each genotype. Table 1 shows the number of animals tested in each group for each significantly different test.

Table 1 Number of animals for each test (M/F)

Results

Sex differences

No sex differences were found for any measure. Subsequent analyses were performed for combined males and females.

Immediate effects

Videotapes showed no observable effects on movement or nursing of pups (data not shown).

Pup weight

Pup weight was the same across groups until P8 when the jj sulfa pup weight fell significantly below that of the other groups. This was evident in a Genotype × sulfa treatment interaction, F (1,60) = 53.23, p < 0.026 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pup weight, g, mean ± SEM, from day of birth (postnatal day (P) 0) until P30. Genotypes: Nj—heterozygous Gunn rat pups, jj—homozygous Gunn rat pups. Treatments: Saline—saline given on P5, sulfa—sulfodimethoxine given on P5

Ultrasonic vocalizations

No difference in latency was found among the groups (all F values <1, indicating no between-group differences).The frequency of the calls was also not affected. All pups expressed calls with the 40–48 kHz range. The number of USVs was affected by sulfa treatment in jj rats only. A significant effect of Genotype, F (1,48) = 36.682, p < 0.0001, and sulfa treatment, F (1,484) = 22.56, p < 0.0001, were found. The Genotype × sulfa treatment interaction was significant, F (1,48)17.21, p < 0.0001, indicating that sulfa treatment reduced the number of USVs in jj rats only and that jj rats treated with saline did not differ from either Nj group (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ultrasonic vocalization (USV) number (mean ± SEM) between the various treatment groups measured on P6. Genotypes: Nj—heterozygous Gunn rat pups, jj—homozygous Gunn rat pups. Treatments: Saline—saline given on P5, sulfa—sulfodimethoxine given on P5

Negative geotaxis

A significant effect of Genotype, F (1,43) = 11.59, p < 0.00, and sulfa treatment F (1,43) = 6.86, p < 0.01, were detected. The interaction of Genotype × sulfa was not significant, F = 2.45. This is likely due to the increase in time exhibited by both Nj and jj pups treated with sulfa. Despite the lack of a significant interaction, Bonferroni post hoc tests confirmed that jj sulfa pups were significantly slower to orient with the snout upward than jj saline pups (p < 0.05). Heterozygous groups did not differ from one another (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Negative geotaxis measured on P10. Data recorded as seconds until it reached head up position, (mean ± SEM). Genotypes: Nj—heterozygous Gunn rat pups, jj—homozygous Gunn rat pups. Treatments: Saline—saline given on P5, sulfa—sulfodimethoxine given on P5

Righting reflex

No difference in time to right was found between the four groups (data not shown).

Rotarod

The effect of Genotype was significant, F (1,57) = 69.99, p < 0.0001, as was the effect of sulfa treatment, F (1,57) = 68.09, p < 0.0001. The Genotype × sulfa interaction was significant, F (1,57) = 49.96, p < 0.0001. Like the pattern detected in emission of USVs, sulfa administration reduced the time the rat was able to stay on the accelerating rotarod only in jj pups and not in the Nj group (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Rotarod test measured on P28, P29, and P30. Data recorded as seconds from the time of placement until falling, mean ± SEM. Genotypes: Nj—heterozygous Gunn rat pups, jj—homozygous Gunn rat pups. Treatments: Saline—saline given on P5, sulfa—sulfodimethoxine given on P5

Cerebellar weight

The effect of Genotype was significant, F (1,55) = 42.7, p < 0.0001, as was the effect of sulfa, F (1,55) = 12.05, p < 0.004. The Genotype × sulfa interaction was significant, F (1,55) = 14.36, p < 0.001. Administration of sulfa to jj pups significantly reduced the weight of the cerebellum but did not reduce the cerebellar weight in the Nj rats (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Cerebellar weights measured on P30 (g, mean ± SEM). Genotypes: Nj—heterozygous Gunn rat pups, jj—homozygous Gunn rat pups. Treatments: Saline—saline given on P5, sulfa—sulfodimethoxine given on P5

Discussion

Our major findings from this study are that jj rats at a stage of brain development equivalent to human preterm infants experience no immediate symptoms of acute bilirubin encephalopathy such as lethargy or poor feeding, there are no sex differences in the outcomes in the measures used here of acute hyperbilirubinemia, and behavioral deficits occur in some but not all cerebellar behaviors tested. Postnatal cerebellar development in the rat progresses rapidly in the first 3 weeks of life. Granule cell genesis is robust at birth and continues until at least P21.12,13 Between P4 and P8 in the rat, the granule and molecular layers increase in volume by 2–3-fold.13 Late gestation of the human is similarly characterized by rapid volume increases in the cerebellum. From gestational week 24–40, the human cerebellum volume increases fivefold.14 This gain in volume is driven largely by both cell genesis and migration of cells from the external granule cell layer in both rats and humans and is the primary area of growth during 30–40 weeks’ human gestation.13,15,16 Purkinje cells are just beginning to sprout dendritic trees and form synaptic contacts around P6 in the rat, an event that parallels the human at 25–30 weeks of gestation.13,15,16,17,18 Pruning and stabilization of long-lasting contacts between granule cells and Purkinje cells continues until at least P17 in the rat.19,20 Though the developmental tempo of rats compared to humans is unlikely to progress in perfect parallel, the P4–P8 day rat pup cerebellum is populating primary neural subregions and rapidly increasing in volume like the human during the second half of gestation. Based on these morphological changes, we estimate that the cerebellar development of rat pups at P5 is roughly equivalent to that of humans at 24–29 weeks of gestation. Important for the context of the data presented here is the finding that cerebellar growth during late gestation is disrupted by prematurity.21 The potential role of bilirubin in this disruption is largely overlooked.

We focused on cerebellar function because the cerebellum is particularly vulnerable to injury during this developmental stage in humans,22,23 although these tests may involve brain regions in addition to the cerebellum. A randomized clinical trial investigated the difference between aggressive and conservative phototherapy in infants with birth weights <1000 g.24 All infants in the aggressive arm were treated with phototherapy starting on the day of birth and at lower total bilirubin concentrations. A modest reduction of bilirubin was observed between the two groups (mg/dl: peak bilirubin, 7.0 + 1.8 vs 9.8 + 2.1; average daily bilirubin, 4.7 + 1.1 vs 6.2 + 1.5; aggressive vs conservative phototherapy). At 18–22 months of follow-up, measures relating to cerebellar function were recorded. Athetosis was significantly reduced in the aggressive phototherapy group, indicating a role for bilirubin in this movement disorder. These results imply that bilirubin, in the absence of clinical signs or symptoms, has long lasting effects on the brain.

Our findings suggest that administration of sulfa on P5 in the jj GR models the clinical manifestation of hyperbilirubinemia in the premature infant. We do not observe any immediate obvious symptoms of acute bilirubin encephalopathy, such as decrease in movement or eating behaviors. However, the number of USVs are significantly reduced by P6 in jj GR pups treated with sulfa but not the latency to vocalize. It is unclear what behavior USV represents in preterm infants. It may be related to effects on hearing25 or to vocal cord dystonia. Early subtle indicators of bilirubin neurotoxicity would be helpful to guide intervention, such as phototherapy. We will be measuring brainstem auditory-evoked potentials in future studies to investigate a possible underlying cause of the effect of bilirubin on USV expression.

Our finding of a significant decrease in weight of the jj–sulfa group may have several explanations. First, it may be a direct effect of bilirubin toxicity. Second, the jj–sulfa pups may be less able to compete with littermates for maternal milk. Third, the dam may be less attentive to this group of pups due to the drastic reduction in vocalizations. It is possible that all three reasons may contribute to the reduced weight.

We also do not observe any sex differences on the outcomes measured here. This finding is consistent with that in the literature for human infants. As summarized by the National Collaborative Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health, gender is not a risk factor for developing hyperbilirubinemia nor is it a risk factor for developing sequelae following hyperbilirubinemia.26

While we measured deficits in a number of behaviors (USV number, negative geotaxis, rotarod), there were a number of behaviors that showed no effect (USV latency, righting reflex, open field). There may be several explanations for this finding. First, the test may not be sensitive enough to detect small changes. For example, the righting reflex is very fast, usually <2 s. A delay by a fraction of a second would not be detectable in our test. Similarly, for an increase or decrease of fractions of seconds in latency to emit USV would not be detected. A second reason for the selective impact on behaviors may be the known temporal and regional vulnerability of the developing brain to hyperbilirubinemia. Developing neurons are known to be more vulnerable than mature neurons.27 It may be that the neural pathways necessary for normal execution of some behaviors are less mature at the time of sulfa injection than those involved in other behaviors. Those pathways that were still immature would be differentially affected.10 The righting reflex appears to be developed in mice by P7, whereas negative geotaxis matures at P17.28 Hence, the effect of acute hyperbilirubinemia at P5 would be expected to affect negative geotaxis more than the righting reflex as the neurons for negative geotaxis are in the process of developing.10 The underlying reason for the increased vulnerability of developing neurons remains unexplained.

There are several limitations to this study. First is the lack of measurement of total serum bilirubin and brain bilirubin in our model. While the hallmark of the hyperbilirubinemia exposure in GRs is cerebellar hypoplasia, we found no significant difference between the cerebellar weights of Nj–saline and jj–saline pups. One reason is that, in this strain of GR, the bilirubin is low compared to other strains and is not high enough to reduce cerebellar weight without sulfa administration. It will be important in the future to characterize the total serum bilirubin and the brain bilirubin in this model. The second limitation is that the behaviors were limited to those involving the cerebellum. Future studies will investigate the impact on other vulnerable brain regions such as the globus pallidus, brainstem auditory nuclei, and hippocampus using physiological and behavioral tests that can dissociate these neural substrates. Third, we did not measure the time course of brain bilirubin content. We suspect that brain bilirubin for sulfa injected jj GR on P5 is less than that reported for jj GRs injected on P16 as total serum bilirubin in jj GRs peaks at approximately P16.7 Thus more bilirubin is present for sulfa to displace from albumin and enter the brain on P16 than on P5.

In summary, this model is promising as a model for preterm hyperbilirubinemia. Further characterization is necessary such as determining bilirubin concentrations in the serum and brain. The mechanism of cerebellar neurotoxicity of preterm infants from bilirubin may be investigated using this animal model.