Abstract
Mangrove sediment is a crucial component in the global mercury (Hg) cycling and acts as a hotspot for methylmercury (MeHg) production. Early evidence has documented the ubiquity of well-studied Hg methylators in mangrove superficial sediments; however, their diversity and metabolic adaptation in the more anoxic and highly reduced subsurface sediments are lacking. Through MeHg biogeochemical assay and metagenomic sequencing, we found that mangrove subsurface sediments (20–100 cm) showed a less hgcA gene abundance but higher diversity of Hg methylators than superficial sediments (0–20 cm). Regional-scale investigation of mangrove subsurface sediments spanning over 1500 km demonstrated a prevalence and family-level novelty of Hg-methylating microbial lineages (i.e., those affiliated to Anaerolineae, Phycisphaerae, and Desulfobacterales). We proposed the candidate phylum Zixibacteria lineage with sulfate-reducing capacity as a currently understudied Hg methylator across anoxic environments. Unlike other Hg methylators, the Zixibacteria lineage does not use the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway but has unique capabilities of performing methionine synthesis to donate methyl groups. The absence of cobalamin biosynthesis pathway suggests that this Hg-methylating lineage may depend on its syntrophic partners (i.e., Syntrophobacterales members) for energy in subsurface sediments. Our results expand the diversity of subsurface Hg methylators and uncover their unique ecophysiological adaptations in mangrove sediments.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary File 1 and 2. The raw reads of metagenomes and 16 S rRNA amplicon sequencing were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Reads Archive (NCBI SRA) database under the project PRJNA798446, PRJNA894374, PRJNA958041, and the National Omics Data Encyclopedia (NODE) under the project OEX012906. All Zixibacteria genomes from this study or NCBI SRA database were shared in Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.7998010).
References
Parks JM, Johs A, Podar M, Bridou R, Hurt RA Jr, Smith SD, et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation. Science. 2013;339:1332–5.
Gilmour CC, Podar M, Bullock AL, Graham AM, Brown SD, Somenahally AC, et al. Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:11810–20.
Wang Y, Janssen SE, Schaefer JK, Yee N, Reinfelder JR. Tracing the uptake of Hg(II) in an iron-reducing bacterium using mercury stable isotopes. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2020;7:573–8.
Gilmour CC, Bullock AL, McBurney A, Podar M, Elias DA. Robust mercury methylation across diverse methanogenic Archaea. mBio. 2018;9:e02403–17.
Podar M, Gilmour CC, Brandt CC, Soren A, Brown SD, Crable BR, et al. Global prevalence and distribution of genes and microorganisms involved in mercury methylation. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1500675.
Lin H, Ascher DB, Myung Y, Lamborg CH, Hallam SJ, Gionfriddo CM, et al. Mercury methylation by metabolically versatile and cosmopolitan marine bacteria. ISME J. 2021;15:1810–25.
McDaniel EA, Peterson BD, Stevens SLR, Tran PQ, Anantharaman K, McMahon KD. Expanded phylogenetic diversity and metabolic flexibility of mercury-methylating microorganisms. mSystems. 2020;5:e00299–00220.
Zhang C-J, Liu Y-R, Cha G, Liu Y, Zhou X-Q, Lu Z, et al. Potential for mercury methylation by Asgard archaea in mangrove sediments. ISME J. 2023;17:478–85.
Probst AJ, Weinmaier T, Raymann K, Perras A, Emerson JB, Rattei T, et al. Biology of a widespread uncultivated archaeon that contributes to carbon fixation in the subsurface. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5497.
Lei P, Zhong H, Duan D, Pan K. A review on mercury biogeochemistry in mangrove sediments: hotspots of methylmercury production? Sci Total Environ. 2019;680:140–50.
De Lipthay JR, Rasmussen LD, Oregaard G, Simonsen K, Bahl MI, Kroer N, et al. Acclimation of subsurface microbial communities to mercury. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;65:145–55.
Frohne T, Rinklebe J, Langer U, Du Laing G, Mothes S, Wennrich R. Biogeochemical factors affecting mercury methylation rate in two contaminated floodplain soils. Biogeosciences. 2012;9:493–507.
Luo Z, Zhong Q, Han X, Hu R, Liu X, Xu W, et al. Depth-dependent variability of biological nitrogen fixation and diazotrophic communities in mangrove sediments. Microbiome. 2021;9:212.
Almahasheer H, Duarte CM, Irigoien X. Nutrient limitation in central Red Sea mangroves. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:271.
Kuhn AL, Kominoski JS, Armitage AR, Charles SP, Pennings SC, Weaver CA, et al. Buried hurricane legacies: increased nutrient limitation and decreased root biomass in coastal wetlands. Ecosphere. 2021;12:e03674.
Li C-H, Zhou H-W, Wong Y-S, Tam NF-Y. Vertical distribution and anaerobic biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in mangrove sediments in Hong Kong, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:5772–9.
Zhang C, Shi T, Liu J, He Z, Thomas H, Dong H, et al. Eco-engineering approaches for ocean negative carbon emission. Sci Bull. 2022;67:2564–73.
Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Hug LA, Sharon I, Castelle CJ, Probst AJ, et al. Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13219.
Hug LA, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Brown CT, Sharma R, Hettich RL, et al. Critical biogeochemical functions in the subsurface are associated with bacteria from new phyla and little studied lineages. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:159–73.
Emerson JB, Thomas BC, Alvarez W, Banfield JF. Metagenomic analysis of a high carbon dioxide subsurface microbial community populated by chemolithoautotrophs and bacteria and archaea from candidate phyla. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1686–703.
Reji L, Cardarelli EL, Boye K, Bargar JR, Francis CA. Diverse ecophysiological adaptations of subsurface Thaumarchaeota in floodplain sediments revealed through genome-resolved metagenomics. ISME J. 2022;16:1140–52.
Murali R, Yu H, Speth D, Wu F, Metcalfe KS, Cremiere A, et al. Physiological adaptation of sulfate reducing bacteria in syntrophic partnership with anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.23.517749 (2022).
Pernthaler A, Dekas AE, Brown CT, Goffredi SK, Embaye T, Orphan VJ. Diverse syntrophic partnerships from deep-sea methane vents revealed by direct cell capture and metagenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7052–7.
Yu R-Q, Reinfelder JR, Hines ME, Barkay T. Syntrophic pathways for microbial mercury methylation. ISME J. 2018;12:1826–35.
Yu C, Feng J, Liu K, Wang G, Zhu Y, Chen H, et al. Changes of ecosystem carbon stock following the plantation of exotic mangrove Sonneratia apetala in Qi’ao Island, China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;717:137142.
Mason OU, Case DH, Naehr TH, Lee RW, Thomas RB, Bailey JV, et al. Comparison of archaeal and bacterial diversity in methane seep carbonate nodules and host sediments, Eel River Basin and Hydrate Ridge, USA. Micro Ecol. 2015;70:766–84.
Matsumoto Y, Chen R, Anikeeva P, Jasanoff A. Engineering intracellular biomineralization and biosensing by a magnetic protein. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8721.
Yin R, Chen D, Pan X, Deng C, Chen L, Song X, et al. Mantle Hg isotopic heterogeneity and evidence of oceanic Hg recycling into the mantle. Nat Commun. 2022;13:948.
Chen L, Liu C, Yin Y, Liu G, Li Y, Cai Y. Mass budget of mercury (Hg) in the seawater of Eastern China Marginal Seas: importance of the sediment–water transport processes. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:11418–28.
Zerkle AL, Yin R, Chen C, Li X, Izon GJ, Grasby SE. Anomalous fractionation of mercury isotopes in the Late Archean atmosphere. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1709.
Anonymous, Telliard WA, Gomez-Taylor M Method 1631, Revision E: mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 4303. EPA-821-R-02-019, (2002).
Anonymous, Telliard WA Method 1630: methyl mercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. US Environmental Protection Agency-Office of Water. (1998).
Blum JD, Bergquist BA. Reporting of variations in the natural isotopic composition of mercury. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;388:353–9.
Janssen SE, Lepak RF, Tate MT, Ogorek JM, DeWild JF, Babiarz CL, et al. Rapid pre-concentration of mercury in solids and water for isotopic analysis. Anal Chim Acta. 2019;1054:95–103.
Blum JD. Applications of stable mercury isotopes to biogeochemistry. Handb Environ Isot Geochem. 2012;I:229–45.
Maheshwari S, Wang J, Barbash DA. Recurrent positive selection of the Drosophila hybrid incompatibility gene Hmr. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:2421–30.
Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6:158.
Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.
Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:605–7.
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:1925–7.
Capo E, Peterson BD, Kim M, Jones DS, Acinas SG, Amyot M, et al. A consensus protocol for the recovery of mercury methylation genes from metagenomes. Mol Ecol Resour. 2023;23:190–204.
Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002195.
Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–2.
Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–9.
He C, Keren R, Whittaker ML, Farag IF, Doudna JA, Cate JHD, et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. Nat Microbiol. 2021;6:354–65.
Knudsen BE, Bergmark L, Munk P, Lukjancenko O, Priemé A, Aarestrup FM, et al. Impact of sample type and DNA isolation procedure on genomic inference of microbiome composition. mSystems. 2016;1:e00095–00016.
Kunin V, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P. A bioinformatician’s guide to metagenomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:557–78.
Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.
Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–3.
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–4.
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–W245.
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.
Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119.
Qian L, Yu X, Zhou J, Gu H, Ding J, Peng Y, et al. MCycDB: a curated database for comprehensively profiling methane cycling processes of environmental microbiomes. Mol Ecol Resour. 2022;22:1803–23.
Yu X, Zhou J, Song W, Xu M, He Q, Peng Y, et al. SCycDB: a curated functional gene database for metagenomic profiling of sulphur cycling pathways. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21:924–40.
Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A, McAllister SM, Chan CS, Barco RA, et al. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:37.
Zhou Z, Tran PQ, Breister AM, Liu Y, Kieft K, Cowley ES, et al. Metabolic: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome. 2022;10:33.
Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost H-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18:366–8.
Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34212.
Anonymous, Callaghan AV, Wawrik B AnHyDeg: a curated database of anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation genes. GitHub. (2016). https://github.com/AnaerobesRock/AnHyDeg.
Christakis CA, Barkay T, Boyd ES. Expanded diversity and phylogeny of mer genes broadens mercury resistance paradigms and reveals an origin for MerA among thermophilic archaea. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:682605.
Badalamenti JP, Summers ZM, Chan CH, Gralnick JA, Bond DR. Isolation and genomic characterization of Desulfuromonas soudanensis WTL, a metal-and electrode-respiring bacterium from anoxic deep subsurface brine. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:913.
Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Miyakawa K, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Anantharaman K, et al. Potential for microbial H2 and metal transformations associated with novel bacteria and archaea in deep terrestrial subsurface sediments. ISME J. 2017;11:1915–29.
Adam PS, Borrel G, Gribaldo S. An archaeal origin of the Wood–Ljungdahl H4MPT branch and the emergence of bacterial methylotrophy. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2155–63.
Adam PS, Borrel G, Gribaldo S. Evolutionary history of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase, one of the oldest enzymatic complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E1166–E1173.
Ferla MP, Patrick WM. Bacterial methionine biosynthesis. Microbiology. 2014;160:1571–84.
Zhang J-W, Dong H-P, Hou L-J, Liu Y, Ou Y-F, Zheng Y-L, et al. Newly discovered Asgard archaea Hermodarchaeota potentially degrade alkanes and aromatics via alkyl/benzyl-succinate synthase and benzoyl-CoA pathway. ISME J. 2021;15:1826–43.
Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2019;36:2251–2.
Matthews RG, Koutmos M, Datta S. Cobalamin-dependent and cobamide-dependent methyltransferases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18:658–66.
Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596:583–9.
Dobson L, Reményi I, Tusnády GE. CCTOP: a consensus constrained topology prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W408–W412.
Dong R, Pan S, Peng Z, Zhang Y, Yang J. mTM-align: a server for fast protein structure database search and multiple protein structure alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W380–W386.
Kung Y, Ando N, Doukov TI, Blasiak LC, Bender G, Seravalli J, et al. Visualizing molecular juggling within a B12-dependent methyltransferase complex. Nature. 2012;484:265–9.
Dauter Z, Wilson KS, Sieker LC, Meyer J, Moulis J-M. Atomic resolution (0.94 Å) structure of Clostridium acidurici ferredoxin. Detailed geometry of [4Fe-4S] clusters in a protein. Biochemistry. 1997;36:16065–73.
Gavriilidou A, Avcı B, Galani A, Schorn MA, Ingham CJ, Ettema TJG, et al. Candidatus Nemesobacterales is a sponge-specific clade of the candidate phylum Desulfobacterota adapted to a symbiotic lifestyle. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01484-z (2023).
Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, et al. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.7: content updates and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;51:D723–32.
Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer K-H, et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:635–45.
Yan Y, Tao H, He J, Huang S-Y. The HDOCK server for integrated protein–protein docking. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:1829–52.
Yan Y, Wen Z, Wang X, Huang SY. Addressing recent docking challenges: a hybrid strategy to integrate template-based and free protein-protein docking. Proteins. 2017;85:497–512.
Huang SY, Zou X. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition. Proteins. 2008;72:557–79.
Laskowski RA, Swindells MB. LigPlot+: multiple ligand–protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model. 2011;51:2778–86.
Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D590–6.
Watts SC, Ritchie SC, Inouye M, Holt KE. FastSpar: rapid and scalable correlation estimation for compositional data. Bioinformatics. 2018;35:1064–6.
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc Int AAAI Conf Web Soc Media. 2009;3:361–2.
Wickham H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2011;3:180–5.
Zhang J, Ma K. spaa: an R package for computing species association and niche overlap. Res Prog Biodivers Conserv China. 2014;10:165–74.
Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, et al. The vegan package. Community Ecol package. 2007;10:719.
Zhou L, Feng T, Xu S, Gao F, Lam TT, Wang Q, et al. ggmsa: a visual exploration tool for multiple sequence alignment and associated data. Brief Bioinform. 2022;23:bbac222.
Wu H, Ding Z, Liu Y, Liu J, Yan H, Pan J, et al. Methylmercury and sulfate-reducing bacteria in mangrove sediments from Jiulong River Estuary, China. J Environ Sci. 2011;23:14–21.
Yu R-Q, Flanders J, Mack EE, Turner R, Mirza MB, Barkay T. Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:2684–91.
Blum JD, Sherman LS, Johnson MW. Mercury isotopes in earth and environmental sciences. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci. 2014;42:249–69.
Demers JD, Blum JD, Zak DR. Mercury isotopes in a forested ecosystem: Implications for air-surface exchange dynamics and the global mercury cycle. Glob Biogeochem Cy. 2013;27:222–38.
Biswas A, Blum JD, Bergquist BA, Keeler GJ, Xie Z. Natural mercury isotope variation in coal deposits and organic soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:8303–9.
Zheng W, Obrist D, Weis D, Bergquist BA. Mercury isotope compositions across North American forests. Glob Biogeochem Cy. 2016;30:1475–92.
Jiskra M, Wiederhold JG, Skyllberg U, Kronberg RM, Kretzschmar R. Source tracing of natural organic matter bound mercury in boreal forest runoff with mercury stable isotopes. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2017;19:1235–48.
Štrok M, Baya PA, Hintelmann H. The mercury isotope composition of Arctic coastal seawater. CR Geosci. 2015;347:368–76.
Yin R, Xu L, Lehmann B, Lepak RF, Hurley JP, Mao J, et al. Anomalous mercury enrichment in Early Cambrian black shales of South China: mercury isotopes indicate a seawater source. Chem Geol. 2017;467:159–67.
Grasby SE, Shen W, Yin R, Gleason JD, Blum JD, Lepak RF, et al. Isotopic signatures of mercury contamination in latest Permian oceans. Geology. 2017;45:55–58.
Maghsodian Z, Sanati AM, Tahmasebi S, Shahriari MH, Ramavandi B. Study of microplastics pollution in sediments and organisms in mangrove forests: a review. Environ Res. 2022;208:112725.
Kritee K, Blum JD, Barkay T. Mercury stable isotope fractionation during reduction of Hg(II) by different microbial pathways. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:9171–7.
Atashgahi S, Aydin R, Dimitrov MR, Sipkema D, Hamonts K, Lahti L, et al. Impact of a wastewater treatment plant on microbial community composition and function in a hyporheic zone of a eutrophic river. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17284.
Madueño L, Starevich VA, Agnello AC, Coppotelli BM, Laprida C, Vidal NC, et al. Assessment of biological contribution to natural recovery of anthropized freshwater sediments from Argentina: autochthonous microbiome structure and functional prediction. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:601705.
Borisov VB, Gennis RB, Hemp J, Verkhovsky MI. The cytochrome bd respiratory oxygen reductases. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2011;1807:1398–413.
Visser JM, de Jong GAH, de Vries S, Robertson LA, Kuenen JG. cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase in the obligately chemolithoautotrophic Thiobacillus sp. W5. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;147:127–32.
Regnell O, Watras CJ. Microbial mercury methylation in aquatic environments: a critical review of published field and laboratory studies. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;53:4–19.
Turner D, Kropinski AM, Adriaenssens EM. A roadmap for genome-based phage taxonomy. Viruses. 2021;13:506.
Naas AE, Solden LM, Norbeck AD, Brewer H, Hagen LH, Heggenes IM, et al. “Candidatus Paraporphyromonas polyenzymogenes” encodes multi-modular cellulases linked to the type IX secretion system. Microbiome. 2018;6:44.
Du H, Pan J, Zou D, Huang Y, Liu Y, Li M. Microbial active functional modules derived from network analysis and metabolic interactions decipher the complex microbiome assembly in mangrove sediments. Microbiome. 2022;10:224.
Kerin EJ, Gilmour CC, Roden E, Suzuki M, Coates J, Mason R. Mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:7919–21.
Gilmour CC, Elias DA, Kucken AM, Brown SD, Palumbo AV, Schadt CW, et al. Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3938–51.
Brown SD, Gilmour CC, Kucken AM, Wall JD, Elias DA, Brandt CC, et al. Genome sequence of the mercury-methylating strain Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:2078–9.
Graham AM, Bullock AL, Maizel AC, Elias DA, Gilmour CC. Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7337–46.
King JK, Kostka JE, Frischer ME, Saunders FM. Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:2430–7.
Drake H, Hu S, Wood H. Purification of five components from Clostridium thermoaceticum which catalyze synthesis of acetate from pyruvate and methyltetrahydrofolate. Properties of phosphotransacetylase. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:11137–44.
Doukov T, Seravalli J, Stezowski JJ, Ragsdale SW. Crystal structure of a methyltetrahydrofolate-and corrinoid-dependent methyltransferase. Structure. 2000;8:817–30.
Burke SA, Krzycki JA. Reconstitution of monomethylamine: coenzyme M methyl transfer with a corrinoid protein and two methyltransferases purified from Methanosarcina barkeri. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:16570–7.
Burke SA, Lo SL, Krzycki JA. Clustered genes encoding the methyltransferases of methanogenesis from monomethylamine. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:3432–40.
Ferguson DJ, Gorlatova N, Grahame DA, Krzycki JA. Reconstitution of dimethylamine: coenzyme M methyl transfer with a discrete corrinoid protein and two methyltransferases purified from Methanosarcina barkeri. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:29053–60.
Naidu D, Ragsdale SW. Characterization of a three-component vanillate O-demethylase from Moorella thermoacetica. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:3276–81.
Gottschalk G, Thauer RK. The Na+-translocating methyltransferase complex from methanogenic archaea. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2001;1505:28–36.
Tallant TC, Paul L, Krzycki JA. The MtsA subunit of the methylthiol: coenzyme M methyltransferase of Methanosarcina barkeri catalyses both half-reactions of corrinoid-dependent dimethylsulfide: coenzyme M methyl transfer. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:4485–93.
Sauer K, Thauer RK. Methanol: coenzyme M methyltransferase from Methanosarcina barkeri: identification of the active‐site histidine in the corrinoid‐harboring subunit MtaC by site‐directed mutagenesis. Eur J Biochem. 1998;253:698–705.
Paul L, Ferguson DJ Jr, Krzycki JA. The trimethylamine methyltransferase gene and multiple dimethylamine methyltransferase genes of Methanosarcina barkeri contain in-frame and read-through amber codons. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:2520–9.
Koutmos M, Datta S, Pattridge KA, Smith JL, Matthews RG. Insights into the reactivation of cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18527–32.
Gionfriddo CM, Tate MT, Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zemla A, Thelen MP, et al. Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic sea ice. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16127.
Drennan CL, Heo J, Sintchak MD, Schreiter E, Ludden PW. Life on carbon monoxide: X-ray structure of Rhodospirillum rubrum Ni-Fe-S carbon monoxide dehydrogenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:11973–8.
Vigneron A, Cruaud P, Aubé J, Guyoneaud R, Goñi-Urriza M. Transcriptomic evidence for versatile metabolic activities of mercury cycling microorganisms in brackish microbial mats. NPJ Biofilms Microb. 2021;7:1–11.
Ranjan RK, Routh J, Ramanathan A, Val Klump J. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon fingerprints in the Pichavaram mangrove–estuarine sediments, southeastern India. Org Geochem. 2012;53:88–94.
Zehnle H, Laso-Pérez R, Lipp J, Riedel D, Benito Merino D, Teske A, et al. Candidatus Alkanophaga archaea from Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vent sediment oxidize petroleum alkanes. Nat Microbiol. 2023;8:1199–212.
Sultana S, Bruns S, Wilkes H, Simon M, Wienhausen G. Vitamin B12 is not shared by all marine prototrophic bacteria with their environment. ISME J. 2023;17:836–45.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000070, 52070196, 32370113), the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (SML2020SP0004), the Innovation Group Project of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai) (311022011), the Guangdong Natural Resources Department Contract (GDNRC[2021]62), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515011406), and Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects (202002030454).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CW conceived and designed the study. SFL, NLP, RWH, ZYZ, and RHC performed the laboratory work and detailed the sampling. SFL and NLP carried out the bioinformatics and statistical analysis. SFL and CW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SFL, CW, and ZLH discussed results and edited. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Hu, R., Peng, N. et al. Phylogenetic and ecophysiological novelty of subsurface mercury methylators in mangrove sediments. ISME J 17, 2313–2325 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01544-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-023-01544-4