Introduction

Ambient intelligence promises a future of sensor-embedded physical environments that are sensitive and responsive to human activities1,2,3. Particularly, the ability to incorporate intelligence into an otherwise passive surrounding environment is of significant interest in healthcare. Such technology could be used to collect longitudinal data, gain insight into a person’s health, and enable remote patient monitoring. Of the various types of sensors used for ambient intelligence, ultra-high radio-frequency identification (UHF-RFID) is particularly suited for the tracking of health-critical behaviors because of its long readout range (up to approximately 10 m), robustness to occlusions, and enhanced privacy compared to optical or acoustic sensors4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Compared with near-field approaches that have significant restrictions on user mobility due to the limited power transfer range and sensitivity to alignment, the RFID technology allows remote sensing at the range of meters simultaneously from multiple spatially distributed objects5,6.

Optical and mechanical imperceptibility is crucial for unobtrusive wireless sensing and ambient intelligence11,12,13,14,15,16 to accommodate users’ regular daily activities without interference. However, existing UHF-RFID devices cannot achieve the transparency and flexibility that is required to create far-field imperceptible wireless interfaces14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25. High-aspect ratio conductive nanomaterials, such as metallic nanowires, can achieve comparable conductivity with transparent conductive oxides (such as ITO) at RF frequencies and are mechanically flexible26,27,28,29,30. Current fabrication processes for such nanowire networks, however, rely either on printing strategies, which suffer from poor conductivity of a figure of merit σDCOp below 100 that is only ~25% of the film prepared with rod-coating or limited resolution because of the inherent instability of evaporative-driven assembly of a low-viscosity ink31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, or laser ablation, which results in thermal damage and residue that compromises optical tranparency39,40,41,42. As a result, the working range of existing transparent RF sensors is limited to centimeter scale and room-scale operation has been achieved only by opaque devices.

To address the challenges, we developed ultrathin and transparent UHF-RFID sensors made from silver nanowire (AgNW) networks that provide capabilities in room-scale wireless ambient sensing (Fig. 1a–c, Supplementary Table 1). We create these sensors using a newly developed adhesion-reversion-driven contact lift-off technique integrated with facile laser cutting technology to directly pattern AgNW networks on ultrathin (< 4.5 µm) polymer substrates without altering the optical and electrical properties. We fabricate RF sensors that achieve high transparency (> 90% across the visible spectrum) and mechanical flexibility while enabling UHF-RFID operation at a range of up to 8 m. We demonstrate the utility of these sensors for ambient intelligence by attaching the sensors conformally on three-dimensional objects and human skin for multiplexed wireless tracking of object temperature, human activities, and respiration signals from different locations using a single wall-mounted RF reader.

Fig. 1: Ambient wireless sensing with ultrathin transparent RF sensors.
figure 1

a Ultrathin and transparent RF sensor based on AgNWs. Inset shows SEM image of the cross-section and top surface. b Schematic of the fabrication process. The antenna pattern is created by laser cutting PVA adhesive placed on the AgNW network following the digital design in computer, removing extraneous AgNW via contact lift-off of PVA adhesive, and exposing the remaining AgNWs area to form pattern via water resolving the adhesion from PVA adhesive in washing. c Working distance and conductivity (figure of merit, σDCOp) of patterns in this work compared with that of other reported fabrication methods. The literature citation numbers are adjacent to the dots or circles. d Illustration of ambient wireless temperature monitoring, activity tracking, and usage detection from a network of RF tag sensors through an RFID reader. Bottom are images of the transparent RF tag sensors placed on a window, left forearm, and a book compared to tag sensors fabricated from copper. e Block diagram shows the device working principle. f Optical transmittance of 4.5 µm-thick tag sensor against a blank PET substrate. g Operating range of the tag sensor in an indoor environment at a transmit power of 36 dBm.

Results

Transparent ambient wireless sensor

Figure 1 shows the overview of the room-scale ambient wireless sensing system using optically transparent and ultrathin RF tag sensors. Owing to the ultrathin and transparent form factor, the tag sensors can be conformally attached onto three-dimensional objects for applications such as temperature monitoring, object usage detection, and human activity tracking (Fig. 1b–d). Figure 1b shows the fabrication process. The polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) tape (50 μm thickness) is attached on AgNW-coated thin film, and cut using a low-cost CO2 laser following the computer-controlled digital design without penetrating the substrate. AgNWs are then removed from the extraneous regions by contact lift-off of the PVA adhesive. The desired pattern is finally obtained by washing away the remaining PVA tape with water to expose the underlying AgNWs. The fabrication method enables computer-aided RF design digitally patterned at scale using conductive AgNW networks on ultrathin substrates through laser defined adhesion reversion of water-soluble PVA tape to AgNWs. Since this process does not require high-temperature annealing, chemical etching or transfer to another substrate, the patterns have optical and electrical properties that are nearly identical to the pristine network (Supplementary Figs. 1, 2), in which the sheet resistance fluctuations are less than 10% and transmittances are almost the same. As a result, it shows over three times higher in conductivity compared to printed patterns and one more time to other laser-based patterns at high transparency of 90%, exhibiting significantly improved working distance from centimeter to meters scale at high transparency (Fig. 1c)5,7,19,31,32,33,37,36,42,43,44,45. Images of tag sensors attached to a window, placed on the left forearm, and on the spine of a book illustrate the optical transparency and mechanical flexibility of the tag sensors compared to copper tag sensors based on the same antenna designs (Fig. 1d, e, Supplementary Figs. 13). Specifically, when applied to a network on a 4.5 µm polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate, the process yields antenna with optical transmittance around 90% at 550 nm (Fig. 1f) and sheet resistance of 9.7 Ω sq−1. An RF tag sensor created by attaching a 0.5 mm × 0.5 mm × 0.1 mm microchip to the antenna achieves an operating range of up to 8 m from a commercial RFID reader at an output power of 36 dBm (Fig. 1g, Methods). By increasing the density of the AgNW network, the range can extend to 15.2 m with RF tag sensor of 1.7 Ω sq1, which is within 84.4% of the operating range of tag sensors based on non-transparent copper.

Figure 2a and Supplementary Fig. 4 show scalable manufacturing of 27 tag sensors on a 20 cm × 18 cm sheet. We also demonstrated the ability to create complex patterns, including a logo and meandered lines, with feature sizes that are visually almost invisible under ambient lighting conditions from AgNWs network with sheet resistance of 6.5 Ω sq−1, requiring digital contrast enhancement on a visually uniform background to reveal the patterns (Fig. 2b). To show how our process enables these properties, we compared three removal strategies in worse case of higher AgNWs deposition density at 71.4% of transmittance which is more difficult to be removed via one-pass peeling: (i) peeling with PVA adhesive in air, (ii) peeling with tape, and (iii) etching with laser ablation (see Methods). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images (Fig. 2c) show that our technique successfully removes the AgNWs completely from the substrate, resulting in a near 100% optical transmittance against the blank substrate and no electrical conductivity (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 5). Supplementary Fig. 6 shows a clear AgNWs edge after removing part of AgNWs using our technique where one side covered by PVA adhesive is completely removed with peeling while the other side remains intact. In contrast, the tape leaves a thin layer of residual AgNWs with an optical transmittance of 97% and sheet resistance of 122.3 Ω sq−1. We attribute this to the high mechanical compliance of PVA adhesive that enables a conformal adherence with AgNWs networks. The laser ablation appears to be effective in disrupting the conductive network, while Ag nanoparticles residues resulting from high-energy irradiation melting (Fig. 2c) causes a reduction of optical transparency to 12% (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 7). Further, in contrast to our approach, the serial process of laser ablation (10% of laser cutting speed) is not suitable for large-scale production. We observed no change in the AgNWs network morphology and density before and after removing the PVA adhesive with water (< 1 min) (Fig. 2c). The fabrication method yielded similar results when applied to a hybrid network of AgNWs and graphene oxide (GO) (Supplementary Fig. 8), which is widely used to improve the conductivity and stability of nanowire networks46, as well as to a variety of substrates, including rigid glass, 100 μm-thick PET, and 4.5 μm-thick PET (Supplementary Fig. 9).

Fig. 2: Fabrication characteristics.
figure 2

a Image of 27 tag sensors produced on a 20 cm × 18 cm substrate using the fabrication method. Scale bar, 3 cm. b Images of fabricated patterns under ambient lighting conditions and on a uniform white background with digital contrast enhancement. Scale bar is 3 mm. c Top row shows schematic of peeling step of PVA adhesive and SEM images of the pristine AgNWs network and the network after washing away the PVA adhesive. Bottom row shows regions where the network is removed by peeling PVA adhesive, peeling with tape, and laser ablation. Scale bar is 500 nm. d Optical transmittance of the pristine AgNW network and regions where the network is removed by PVA peeling, tape peeling and laser ablation against a blank PET substrate.

Antenna performance

We next studied the performance of RF antennas produced using our method by fabricating a 950 MHz meandered dipole antenna from AgNW networks with varying degrees of optical transparency and electrical conductivity (Supplementary Fig. 10). To ensure the conductivity measurement accuracy, we repeat on sample with 5 different locations (Supplementary Fig. 11). Figure 3a shows the characterization setup in which the antennas are attached to a SMA-type connector via silver paint and placed in an anechoic chamber (see Methods). Transparent antennas with sheet resistances ranging from 1.7 to 9.7 Ω sq−1 produced a dipole radiation pattern that closely matches that of the same antenna fabricated from copper (Fig. 3b). Owing to the increased resistive loss of the antenna, the gain of the antenna decreases with the optical transparency. For the antenna fabricated from the 9.7 Ω sq−1 network (~90% transparency at 550 nm), the gain is −3.8 dB of the copper antenna.

Fig. 3: Transparent antenna performance.
figure 3

a Image of the experimental setup in an anechoic chamber. Inset shows connector placement. b Measured radiation patterns (E-plane) from antennas fabricated from transparent AgNW networks with varying sheet resistances relative to the gain of a copper antenna. c Reflection coefficient S11 spectra of the antennas. d Input return loss, 8 dB bandwidth, and 10 dB bandwidth as a function of the sheet resistance Rs. e VSWR as a function of Rs. f Relative radiation efficiency as a function of Rs compared to the copper antenna.

We also characterized the resonances of the antennas around the operating frequency of 950 MHz by measuring their scattering parameters S11. Figure 3c shows that position of the resonant dips in S11 spectra of the transparent antennas are closely aligned with that of the copper antenna, which indicates that the fabrication method has sufficiently high resolution to accurately produce electromagnetic structures in this frequency range. The return loss is greater than 10 dB for all of the antennas, and is the lowest for the antenna fabricated from the 9.7 Ω sq−1 network with highest transparency (Fig. 3d). The operating bandwidth exceeds 210 MHz (10 dB criteria) or 150 MHz (8 dB criteria) for antennas fabricated from networks with sheet resistance lower than 6.5 Ω sq−1, meeting requirements of standard RFID protocols even at the highest transparency based on the 9.7 Ω sq−1 network47,48. In all cases, the voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) was less than 2, indicating that the antennas are impedance-matched to a standard 50 Ω port. Measurements using a test antenna placed at a distance of 4.5 m (see Methods) show that the radiation efficiency of the transparent antennas are within 40 to 80% of the copper antenna.

RF tag sensor performance

To evaluate the system characteristics, we attached transponder chips to the transparent antennas and performed a variety of wireless sensing tasks using a commercially available RFID reader (see Methods). Figure 4a shows images of four meandered tag sensors fabricated from AgNW networks with varying sheet resistances and optical transparencies under ambient lighting conditions. The reader uses a linearly polarized antenna with a gain of 6 dBi and a maximum output power of 30 dBm in compliance with regulatory requirements for electromagnetic emission in uncontrolled environments (see Methods)49,50. Using this configuration, wireless sensing is primarily limited by the amount of power extracted by the tag sensor antenna, which must exceed the sensitivity of the transponder chip (about −20 dBm) in order for the readout to be successful. The transparent meandered tag sensor fabricated from 9.7 Ω sq−1 AgNW networks with 90% transparency has a maximum readout range of 3.0 m at normal incidence from the reader antenna. The range can be extended up to 10.6 m using tag sensors based on the denser 1.7 Ω sq−1 network, which is within 81.5% of readout range achieved with the tag sensor fabricated using copper (Fig. 4b). Experiments with alternative tag sensor designs yielded similar readout ranges (Supplementary Figs. 12, 13 and Supplementary Movie 1) and performance relative to their counterparts based on copper. We also tested the angular coverage of wireless sensing by varying the angle of incidence between the reader and the tag sensor. The maximum angle of incidence decreases from 55o to 40o as the sheet resistance of the AgNW network increases from 1.7 to 9.7 Ω sq−1, compared to 70o for the copper-based tag sensor (Fig. 4c). We then studied the tag detection under shape deformation by bending the tag sensor. We note that even at 180o bending, the tag sensor remains functional with only 22% decrease in Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 14).

Fig. 4: RF tag sensor performance.
figure 4

a Images of 4.5 µm-thick transparent tag sensors fabricated from AgNW networks with varying sheet resistance under ambient lighting conditions. The design and the photograph of the antenna is shown on the left. b Operating range of the transparent tag sensors using a reader antenna with gain of 6 dBi and maximum transmit power of 30 dBm. Error bar is the standard deviation of the operating range. c Maximum angle of interrogation of the RF tag sensors. The tag sensors are placed 2 m from a reader antenna with a gain of 6 dBi and a maximum transmit power of 30 dBm. Error bar is the standard deviation of the maximum angle. d Change in RSSI as a function of bending angle of the tag sensor. Measurements are performed using a tag sensor fabricated from a 9.7 Ω sq−1 network (90% transparency) at 2 m range from the reader. Error bar is the standard deviation of the change of RSSI. eg RSSI over 1000 cycles of folding (e), 1000 cycles of crumpling (f), and after soaking for 24 h in water and IPA (g) from a tag sensor with 9.7 Ω sq−1 network (90% transparency) at 2 m range from the reader. h Change in RSSI obtained from a tag sensor attached onto the forearm of a human subject during physical activity. i Wireless temperature readout from the tag sensor when it is placed on an ice bag and a hotplate.

We further characterized the robustness of the fabricated tag sensors to mechanical stresses and wetting. Repeated folding and crumpling of the tag sensor fabricated from the 9.7 Ω sq−1 network, which exhibits the highest transparency, demonstrate no significant change in the fidelity of wireless readout, as measured by the RSSI (Fig. 4e, f, Supplementary Movie 2). In contrast, tag sensors fabricated from copper failed to recover to their original shape after folding, leading to reduction of wireless readout ability (Supplementary Fig. 15). Signals obtained from the tag sensors were stable following 24 h of soaking in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water even without encapsulating the AgNW network in a protective material (Fig. 4g). The mechanical characteristics resulting from the ultrathin profile of the tag sensors enable them to be conformally attached on the human body for sensing human activity. Figure 4h shows an example in which attaching a transparent tag sensor to the forearm of a human subject allows tracking of standing, walking, and running at various speeds through the RSSI of the signal acquired by the reader. In addition, the tag sensors can be separately configured with sensors whose data can be transmitted to the reader during the readout process. For instance, transparent tag sensors configured with thermal sensors can transmit environmental temperature between 0 and 85 °C with high accuracy compared to a thermocouple (Fig. 4i, Supplementary Fig. 16).

Imperceptible wireless sensor network

We demonstrated the utility of the fabricated tag sensors for ambient wireless sensing by deploying multiple tag sensors in an indoor environment for multiplexed detection of various human activities. A RFID reader was mounted on a wall and connected to a graphical user interface that displays the RSSI obtained from each tag sensor and, if applicable, data from the integrated temperature sensor. Capabilities were evaluated in three setups: (i) multiple object tracking using tag sensors placed on the spine of a book, on the exterior of a mug, and on a door; (ii) ambient temperature and human activity monitoring using tag sensors placed on a window, on a pill dispenser, and on the chest; (iii) gait detection using tag sensors placed on the left and right arms and legs (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Movie 3). In the first setup, the RSSI trace and the temperature data revealed when the book is moved through the room, hot coffee is poured in the mug, and the door is opened and closed (Fig. 5b–d). These activities were individually identifiable because of the unique ID associated with each tag sensor and multiplexing protocols used by the reader. In the second setup, a tag sensor placed on the window tracked the room temperature (about 21 °C) while a tag sensor attached to the forearm captured a ~ 3 °C increase in skin temperature when exposed to elevated amounts of sunlight. At the same time, RSSI traces obtained from tag sensors on the pill dispenser and on the chest of an occupant showed variations of \(\pm\)10 dB when the subject opened the pill dispenser and changed from an upright to lying down position (Fig. 5e–g). Further experiments showed that RSSI trace obtained from the tag sensor attached to the chest exhibits periodic variations whose peak-to-peak interval can be used to measure the respiration rate of the subject, as shown during sleeping, standing, walking, and running (Fig. 5h). Finally, in the third setup, four tag sensors placed on the arms and legs of the subject produced independent RSSI traces (Fig. 5i, Supplementary Fig. 17, and Movie 4) whose peak-to-peak intervals corresponded to the stride time \(\triangle t\) of a subject on a treadmill (Fig. 5j). The data revealed that \(\triangle t\) obtained from each tag sensor were not significantly different, which is consistent with the motion of a healthy subject. Increasing the speed of the treadmill from 3 to 7 km h−1 resulted in a corresponding decrease in the stride time from 1.03 to 0.64 s, indicating an increased gait. Analysis of the stride time variability (STV) – an important physiological indicator of fatigue – showed that the STV varies from 2.36% to 3.06% depending on the gait, which is consistent with the 3% benchmark for healthy subjects with normal gait control51,52.

Fig. 5: Room-scale ambient wireless sensing.
figure 5

a Images of transparent tag sensors with 4.5 µm thickness placed on various objects for multiplexed activity tracking. A RFID reader is placed on the wall in a room and streams data to a graphical user interface. bd Multiplexed RSSI and temperature data when the subject moves a book through the room (b), pours hot coffee into a mug (c), and opens and closes the door (d). eg Multiplexed RSSI and temperature data when the subject exposes her skin to sunlight (e), obtains medicine from a pill dispenser (f), and sits upright and lies down on a bed (g). h RSSI obtained from a tag sensor placed on the chest of a subject during sleeping, standing, running, and walking. The peak-to-peak interval indicates the respiration rate (RR) of the subject. i RSSI obtained from 4 tag sensors placed on the arms and legs of a subject jogging on a treadmill at a speed of 7 km h−1. j Exploded view of the RSSI trace showing the stride time \(\triangle t\) given by the peak-to-peak interval. k Stride time \(\triangle t\) obtained from arms and legs when the speed is held constant at 7 km h−1 (top) and from right arm but changing the speed from 3 to 7 km h−1 (bottom). STV, stride time variability.

Discussion

This paper demonstrates ultrathin and transparent RF tag sensors that provide capabilities in imperceptible room-scale ambient wireless sensing. We create these tag sensors using a facile scalable fabrication method that combines laser cutting technology to digitally define the pattern and an adhesion reversion process to directly expose the pattern of transparent conductive AgNW networks on ultrathin substrates. Characterization experiments show that the tag sensors achieve thickness less than 4.5 µm, transparency exceeding 90% across the visible spectrum, and RF characteristics compatible with room-scale UHF-RFID wireless operation. Multiplexed operation of multiple tag sensors attached to objects and the human body in complex indoor environments using a UHF-RFID reader demonstrate the utility of the tag sensors for continuously tracking health-relevant behaviors, such as interactions with objects, temperature, and human body motions in daily living spaces.

Ultrathin and transparent RF tag sensors may open a range of opportunities to gain insight about human health through ambient intelligence. In daily living spaces, RF tag sensors could be used to track hand hygiene, medication adherence, and physical activity and provide feedback to promote healthy behaviors53,54. They can also be used in elderly homes to detect falls and impairment of one’s ability to perform activities of daily life, such as dressing, bathing, and eating55,56. In these contexts, the mechanical and optical imperceptibility of the tag sensors may reduce the obtrusiveness of the technology and increase user acceptance, while protecting privacy by only allowing labeled objects to be tracked within a defined region. To make sense of the datasets provided by these tag sensors, machine learning models that are computationally efficient, privacy-preserving, and capable of detecting rare and infrequent events will need to be developed57,58. Furthermore, inferring motions using machine learning could provide initial risk assessment before clinical diagnosis59,60.

With further development, our fabrication process may be adapted for large-scale manufacturing of RF tag sensors for practical widespread use. The key patterning step relies on laser cutting which is already well-established for RFID and various devices manufacturing at large volumes61,62,63,64,65. In this regard, methods to increase the throughput of laser cutting based on multi-optics systems could be applied here66. Automation of the peeling step can be achieved with roll-to-roll processes, such as by using tension rollers67. Furthermore, the process could be extended to the fabrication of transparent RF devices that demand higher resolution, such as those operating at frequencies above 1 GHz, by using an ultraviolet laser cutter with a spot size of 10–20 µm68. Our process could also be applied to pattern other classes of nanowire structures and functional materials, such as carbon nanotubes, to incorporate additional sensing functionalities in the RF tag sensors69. Further, the conductivities can be improved by increasing the aspect ratio of AgNW70 or introducing composites70, which have the potential to yield increased RF performance.

Methods

Fabrication process

The AgNW dispersion (Zhejiang Kechuang Advanced Materials Co., Ltd, 10 mg ml1, average diameter ~30 nm and length ~15 μm) was diluted to 1 mg ml1 with isopropyl alcohol. The 4.5 μm (Sigma Aldrich) and 100 μm (Dupont Teijin Films) PET substrates were cleaned with deionized water, alcohol, and acetone, and then dried in the oven. The diluted AgNW dispersion was then coated onto the PET substrate using a Meyer rod (size 6). The conductivity and transparency of the resulting AgNWs film was tuned by changing the coating times, which varied density of the AgNW network deposited on the substrate. Water-soluble tape (3 M 5414, PVA adhesive, 50 μm thickness) was attached onto the surface of AgNW/PET film and pressed to establish a seamless contact. The tape was cut into the desired pattern using a laser cutter (Universal Laser Systems, VLS 2.30). The parameters of the laser cutter (0.4% power, 3% speed, 1000 pixels-per-inch, 5 image density, vector mode) were set to cut through the tape but not the substrate. The tape in the extraneous areas was manually peeled, leaving only the desired pattern on the substrate. The remaining tape was removed by soaking in water for 5 min. To improve the adhesion of AgNWs to substrate PET and wettability of AgNWs dispersion during coating, the PET can be optionally treated with oxygen plasma (50 w, 30 s, Femto Science FT12-EP078) before coating. To further improve the adhesion and mechanical duration, graphene oxide (GO) solution was optionally coated on the top surface of AgNWs. Without specifical description, the AgNWs surface was over-coated with a GO layer and post-annealed at 100 oC for 10 min followd by DI water wash for 2 times.

Antenna measurements

Measurements used a meandered dipole antenna with dimensions of 126 mm \(\times\) 15 mm, minimum size feature of 0.4 mm, and center frequency of 950 MHz. A 50 Ω sub-miniature version A (SMA) connector was soldered to a 2 mm \(\times\) 2 mm copper foil and attaching to the connection pads of the antenna using conductive paste. S-parameters were measured using a coaxial cable (BU-4150029024, Mueller Electric Co) and a vector network analyzer (VNA, FieldFox N9915A). The radiation pattern was measured in a 5.5 m \(\times\) 3.5 m \(\times\)3.5 m RF anechoic chamber lined with 0.5 m height pyramidal absorbing foam. The dipole antenna was placed on a rotary table (AL-4903-3A, 1o step size, and 10% rotation velocity) and a horn antenna (ANT-DR18S) was placed 4.5 m away. For all measurements, the input power was set to 10 dBm.

RF tag sensor integration

Three RF tag sensors were fabricated with overall dimensions 93 mm × 1 mm (Fig. 1f window), 93 mm × 8 mm (Fig. 1f book), and 70 mm × 15 mm (Fig. 1f arm). The first two tag sensors use chip MR6-p. The last one uses Ucode8 (U8). All the tag sensors follow the half-wave dipole antenna design and possess similar size with the commercial one. The electrical connection between chip and tag sensor antennas is formed via using conductive paint (Ted Pella, Inc, Pelco 16062). To ensure a robust conductive connection between tag sensor and chip, the conductive paint was applied as thin as possible and was baked around 100 oC for 10 min. All the tag sensor antennas are designed for working under ultrahigh radio frequency around 860–960 MHz. For wireless temperature measurement, chip NMV2D CAB0 was used on tag sensor.

RF tag sensor measurements

The measurement system includes tag sensor, reader, reader antenna, computer. The RFID system uses the EPCglobal standard. The reader (Impinj Speedway R420) was connected to computer via networking cable. The reader antenna was secured on a tripod and connected to the reader with a coaxial cable. The tag sensor was placed in the front of the reader antenna, and the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) value was recorded from software (ItemTest 2.5). According to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations for electronic devices in the UHF RFID band, the maximum effective isotropic radiated power (EIRP) allowed is 36 dBm. Experiments involved varying the reading distance, reading angle, the deformation of the tag sensor, and performance on moving objects and human subjects. For wireless temperature measurements, a UHF-R200 reader was used.

Optical and electrical characterization

The morphologies of AgNWs films and patterns were measured with Field-emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) (FEI Verios460) and Optical Microscope. Transmittance measurement was conducted with UV-vis Spectrophotometer (Shimadze UV-1800) against a blank PET substrate. Resistance was measured with multimeter (2709B, BK Precision). Two silver paste electrodes were prepared on test sample first to reduce the contact resistance between measuring probe of multimeter and AgNWs.