Abstract
Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with adverse clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients, but the underlying pathway is still unclear. Limited evidence has suggested that accelerated biological aging may play an important role. In this study, using a sub-sample of 906 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer at M.D. Anderson, we examined whether levels of selected markers of biological aging (e.g., allostatic load, telomere length, and global DNA methylation) were affected by neighborhood disadvantage. The Area Deprivation Index was used to determine the neighborhood disadvantage. Based on the median ADI at the national level, the study population was divided into low and high ADI groups. Overall, breast cancer patients from the high ADI group were more likely to be younger and non-Hispanic Black than those from the low ADI group (P < 0.001, respectively). They were also more likely to have higher grade and poorly differentiated breast tumors (P = 0.029 and 0.019, respectively). For the relationship with markers, compared to the low ADI group, high ADI group had higher median levels of allostatic load (P = 0.046) and lower median levels of global DNA methylation (P < 0.001). Compared to their counterparts, those from the high ADI group were 20% more likely to have increased allostatic load and 51% less likely to have increased levels of global DNA methylation. In summary, we observed that levels of allostatic load and global DNA methylation are influenced by neighborhood disadvantage among breast cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among females and the leading cause of death worldwide1. Emerging evidence has shown that living in a disadvantaged neighborhood has been associated with a later stage of diagnosis, suboptimal treatment, and lower survival in women with invasive breast cancer2,3,4,5. However, how neighborhood disadvantage may biologically contribute to adverse breast cancer outcomes is still unclear. Emerging evidence has suggested that accelerated biological aging may serve as the critical player linking neighborhood disadvantage and aging-related chronic diseases, which may also contribute to poorer outcomes among breast cancer patients. Living in a disadvantageous neighborhood may lead to poor health behaviors6,7, increased toxicant exposures8, and lack of access to health services9. In addition, living in a deprived neighborhood can also lead to increased discrimination and segregation10. All of which above may result in increased chronic stress11,12,13,14, provoke biological weathering in endocrine and inflammatory systems, accelerate biological aging, and consequently result in an increased risk of aging-related diseases15,16. Among breast cancer patients these factors may translate into aggressive disease characteristics, poorer clinical outcomes, reduced quality of life, and shortened survival.
Though advanced age is one of the main risk factors for breast cancer, such a hypothesis has not been tested in breast cancer yet. It has been well-documented that poor healthy behaviors (e.g., obesity and being physically inactive) are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and adverse clinical outcomes17,18. In addition, laboratory evidence has shown that exposure to environmental toxins, particularly endocrine-disrupting chemicals (e.g., bisphenol A (BPA) and dioxins), can promote the proliferation of breast cancer cells19. Our study found that increased allostatic load, a metabolic index related to chronic stress, is also associated with increased odds of having aggressive breast tumors among breast cancer patients20. Thus, it is very likely that biological aging may represent a meaningful biological link between the neighborhood characteristics and adverse breast cancer outcomes.
In this study, we evaluated the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and markers of biological aging among breast cancer patients. The included markers were allostatic load, telomere length, and global DNA methylation in leukocytes, all of which are associated with breast cancer outcomes20,21,22. The study population included 906 women with newly diagnosed stage I to III breast cancer at M.D. Anderson from 2013 to 2018. Our hypothesis stated that living in the disadvantaged neighborhood (assessed using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI)) would be associated with accelerated indicators of biological aging among breast cancer survivors.
Materials and methods
Study population
The study population was derived from a breast cancer epidemiological study beginning in 201223. Participants were patients at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) with newly diagnosed (defined by the presence of malignant breast epithelial cells) and histologically confirmed stage I to III (by microscopic analysis and molecular subtype) breast cancer. All patients were residents of the Greater Houston area. Blood samples were drawn before any cancer treatment. Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant. Self-reported ethnic background was used to define race and ethnicity. The Institutional Review Boards approved this study of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and all study participants provided written informed consent before the baseline interview.
Area deprivation index (ADI)
In this study, we used the area deprivation index (ADI) from the Neighborhood Atlas to assess the levels of neighborhood disadvantage24. The 2019 ADI (v3.1) was constructed using the 2015–2019 5-year estimates from the US Census American Community Survey. The description of Neighborhood Atlas and ADI can be found at https://www.neighborhoodatlas.medicine.wisc.edu/. A neighborhood is defined as a Census Block Group. A census block is the smallest geographic unit used by the United States Census Bureau to tabulate 100-percent data. A census block group comprises a set of blocks that average 100 population and the smallest unit with detailed demographic-economic characteristics. Thus, compared to the traditional neighborhood, the Census block group is more informative. The ADI provides the rankings of neighborhoods by a socioeconomic disadvantage in a region of interest. It includes factors for the theoretical domains of income, education, employment, and housing quality. This study used the national percentile rankings at the block group level from 1 to 100. The percentiles are constructed by ranking the ADI from low to high for the nation and grouping the block groups/neighborhoods into bins corresponding to each 1% range of the ADI. A block group with a ranking of 1 indicates the lowest level of "disadvantage" within the nation, and an ADI with a scale of 100 indicates the highest level of "disadvantage."
Allostatic load
The construction of allostatic load was described extensively in our prior publication20. In brief, data were collected from interviews, medical records, and laboratory assays. We used a total of 17 factors to construct the allostatic load score, including systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), high and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL and LDL), total cholesterol, triglycerides, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), glucose, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), albumin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine, C-reactive protein (CRP), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), rest heart rate (RHR), and the history of taking medication to control metabolic diseases and hypertension.
Telomere length and telomerase activity in leukocytes
The method for quantifying telomere length in leukocytes is described in our previous publication25. The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was applied to measure leukocyte telomere length. Briefly, the ratio of the telomere repeat copy number (T) to the single gene (human globulin) copy number (S) was determined for each sample. The derived T/S ratio was proportional to the overall telomere length.
Global DNA methylation in leukocytes
The method for quantifying global DNA methylation in leukocytes is described in our previous publication26. 5-Methylcytosine (5-mC) in blood leukocyte DNA was used as the marker of global DNA methylation. 5-mC was measured by the 5-mC DNA ELISA Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
A total of 961 breast cancer patients were eligible for the study. However, 55 were excluded due to missing data on critical epidemiological (demographics and healthy behaviors) and clinical variables (estrogen receptor (ER) status, tumor stage, and grade). So, the final study population included 906 breast cancer cases. ADI and biomarker data were available for all 906 patients. We used 50 percentiles of ADI at the national level as the cutoff to divide the study population into two groups: low ADI group (< 50%) and high ADI group (≥ 50%). First, we evaluated whether demographics (age, race, education, marital, and BMI), health behaviors (cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and physical activity), and tumor characteristics (ER status, tumor stage, and tumor grade) differed between low and high ADI groups. The adverse outcomes included ER-, stage III, and poorly differentiated tumor grade. The Student's test was used for continuous variables, and the Chi-Square test was used for categorical variables. Then, we assessed whether the levels among the markers of biological aging differed between low and high ADI groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We further categorized each maker of biological aging into a categorical variable (high vs. low) using median levels of each marker in the low ADI group as the cutoff point. To further clarify the association between the ADI group and markers of biological aging, we applied logistic regression analysis with the adjustment of demographic factors in model 1 and demographic and healthy lifestyle factors in model 2. Potential interactions between biological aging-related biomarkers with covariates were assessed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in logistic regression analysis. In the exploratory analysis, we applied the Sobel test to assess whether and to what extent markers of biological aging mediated the association between ADI with tumor stage and grade. All reported P values were two-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute).
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board at M D Anderson Cancer Center and in accordance with the ethical standards of 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Results
This study included a total of 906 breast cancer cases. We did not observe any patients living in the most disadvantaged block groups from 81 to 100%. Five hundred forty-five were categorized into the low ADI group, and 361 were classified into the high ADI group. Table 1 illustrates the distributions of demographics, healthy behaviors, and tumor characteristics by ADI groups. Compared to those in the low ADI group, those in the high ADI group were younger (mean: 55.6 vs. 57.2 years old, P < 0.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (25.21% vs. 12.48%, P < 0.001), and less likely to have a college degree (27.15% vs. 34.13%, P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed for marital status (P = 0.342). Regarding health lifestyle factors, those from the high ADI group were marginally more likely to have obesity than those from the low ADI group (34.07% vs. 28.25%, P = 0.080). However, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and tobacco use did not differ between high and low ADI groups. For tumor characteristics, there was a greater percentage of stage III diagnoses (38.23% vs. 31.19%, P = 0.029) and a greater percentage of poorly differentiated grade (55.12% vs 46.42%, P = 0.019) among those in the high ADI group relative to the low.
Next, we investigated the association between the ADI group and markers of biological aging. Compared to the low ADI group, median levels of allostatic load were statistically significantly higher in the high ADI group (P = 0.046) (Table 2). In addition, median global DNA methylation levels were statistically significantly lower in the high ADI group compared to the low ADI group (P = 0.035 and < 0.001, respectively). ADI was not associated with telomere length. We further categorized each marker into two categories (low and high) based on the median levels of each biomarker in the low ADI group. In the logistic regression analysis, we found that breast cancer patients from the high ADI group had 1.20-fold increased odds of having high allostatic load (OR = 1.35, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.74) and had 51% decreased odds of having high global DNA methylation (OR = 0.40, 95%CI: 0.27, 0.60) after the adjustment of demographic variables (e.g., age of diagnosis, race, education, and marital status) (Table 3). In further adjusting healthy behavioral factors (e.g., BMI, physical activity, alcohol drinking, and tobacco use), the significant associations remained (allostatic load: OR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.02, 1.87; global DNA methylation: OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.33, 0.65). No significant association was observed between high telomere length and the ADI group.
Finally, using the mediation analysis, we examined the potential mediating role of higher allostatic load and global DNA methylation on the association between ADI group with tumor stage and grade (Table 4). Increased global DNA methylation was found to mediate 6.52 and 7.98% of the association between higher ADI group with grade III and poorly differentiated tumor grade (P = 0.037 and 0.023). No significant effect was observed for allostatic load.
Discussion
To our best knowledge, this is the first study to assess the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and markers of biological aging among breast cancer patients. In the study, we reported that breast cancer patients who lived in the area with high ADI had higher median allostatic load levels and lower median global DNA methylation levels. In addition, global DNA methylation was found to mediate 6.52 and 7.98% of the association between ADI with stage III and poorly differentiated tumor grade (P = 0.037 and 0.023). The results from this study shed light on the importance of biological aging in linking neighborhood disadvantage with aggressive breast tumor characteristics and other adverse clinical outcomes.
During the aging process, epigenetic changes, including global DNA hypomethylation and hypermethylation at regions of CpG island, are commonly observed27. Such changes in the epigenetic landscape may contribute to aging by adversely affecting genomic stability and gene regulation. In this study, we found a statistically significant association between high ADI and decreased levels of global DNA methylation. The possible pathways underlying the are likely to be multifactorial. For example, living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is known to have lower levels of physical activity and a higher likelihood of being overweight or obese. In a meta-analysis of 24 studies, a trend between higher levels of physical activity and higher levels of global DNA methylation was observed22 and subsequently led to a suggestive association with a reduced breast cancer risk. Furthermore, living in a disadvantaged neighborhood may have increased exposure to certain endocrine disruptors (e.g., BPA and dioxins)19. It has been known that exposure to endocrine disruptors influences DNA methylation globally and CpG site specifically28. Interestingly, breast tissue is particularly susceptible to the effects of endocrine disruptors during the development period as well as adulthood29. In addition, chronic stress is known to induce persistent changes in global DNA methylation and gene expression30.
The relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and global DNA methylation has rarely been studied. Only one study has been found in the literature. Coker et al. found that pregnant women living in neighborhoods with the highest poverty levels gave birth to infants with higher cord blood LINE-1 methylation compared with pregnant women living in the lowest level of poverty31. On the contrary, several studies have investigated the gene or CpG site-specific methylation and its relationship with neighborhood disadvantage. For example, in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study, neighborhood characteristics have been found to influence DNA methylation of genes involved in stress response and inflammation32. More interestingly, using newly developed epigenetic clocks based on DNA methylation, Lawrence et al. recently reported that residing in a neighborhood with a higher deprivation index had higher epigenetic age acceleration estimated by Hannum, PhenoAge, and GrimAge clocks33.
The positive association between high ADI and increased allostatic load is consistent with previous reports34. In a scoping review of 14 studies, most studies (n = 12) reported a significant association between neighborhood deprivation and allostatic load, even after adjustment for confounding variables such as individual socioeconomic status, gender, and age34. In another study using data from three cohort studies in European countries, a statically significant trend of increasing allostatic load with the increase of area deprivation (P < 0.001) was reported35. To dissect the potential pathways that might help explain the relationships between ADI with global DNA methylation and allostatic load, we also assessed adjustment for healthy behaviors (e.g., tobacco use, alcohol drinking, obesity, and physical inactivity) influenced the association. Though the adjusted associations attenuated slightly, the significant association has remained. Clearly, those healthy behaviors didn’t fully account for the significant association. It is very likely that other pathways in addition to health-related behaviors contribute to the observed associations.
Unlike previous studies, we didn’t observe the significant association between telomere length with neighborhood disadvantage36 and several neighborhood characteristics measured subjectively and objectively37,38,39,40. In a previous study using the data from the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, neighborhood deprivation was inversely associated with telomere length among individuals living in neighborhoods with medium neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) (P = 0.0005) and high NDI (P = 0.003)36. However, only medium NDI (P = 0.009) was associated with shorter telomere length among women. One significant discrepancy between our study and those studies is the study population. Unlike those studies, our study population is consistent with women diagnosed with breast cancer. Telomere length has dual role in cancer development. Though critically short telomeres may lead to chromosomal degradation, end-to-end fusion, and abnormal recombination, processes involved in cancer development, cells with longer telomeres may favor delayed cell senescence, thus increasing the chance of developing chromosomal instability and genetic aberrations, eventually leading to carcinogenic transformation41. In cancer epidemiological studies, both longer or shorter telomere length has been associated with an increased risk of breast cancer42.
A few studies have examined the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and breast tumor characteristics. In three Appalachian states, area deprivation is strongly associated with the disparity in the later stage of breast cancer. The most deprived counties had a 3.31 times greater rate of LSBC compared to the least deprived43. In a recent publication by Babatunde et al., a higher social deprivation index was associated with a distant stage at diagnosis (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02–1.10) among breast cancer patients44. We have similar findings in our study. Furthermore, we found that the mediation effect of global DNA methylation between higher ADI group with grade III and poorly differentiated tumor grade. Our results highlight the role of global DNA methylation in linking neighborhood disadvantage and adverse tumor characteristics among breast cancer patients.
There are several limitations to this study. The study design is cross-sectional, and none of the breast cancer patients included in this study live in the area with an ADI of over 80%. This may limit our statistical power to detect the significant association. It may also reduce our ability to interpret and generalize the findings. There are many different area-based deprivation measures developed and available to public health scientists. Other measurements may produce different results. However, nearly all of them have included the same or similar factors in income, education, employment, and housing quality extracted from the Census data. Thus, we believe the overall results from those measures will be similar to the levels of neighborhood disadvantage. The selection of ADI over other measures is mainly because this ADI measure has been frequently used in the scientific community, which demonstrates its high validity. Though the study has included non-Hispanic Black and Mexican American breast cancer patients, the number is modest. Thus, we may not have adequate power to assess whether the association differs by race. Additionally, markers of biological aging were measured only once. A single measurement may not reflect the dynamic nature of the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and biological aging. Finally, we don’t have a validation population included in this study. Nevertheless, the considerable strengths of our study outweigh the limitations. Findings from this study contribute important knowledge on how neighborhood disadvantage may affect breast cancer outcomes through accelerated biological aging. Additional research, particularly addressing the limitations mentioned above, is needed to validate our findings, and further clarify the association.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 (2021).
Qin, B. et al. Neighborhood social environmental factors and breast cancer subtypes among black women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 30(2), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1055 (2021).
Shariff-Marco, S. et al. Neighborhood archetypes and breast cancer survival in California. Ann. Epidemiol. 57, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.01.004 (2021).
Hossain, F. et al. Neighborhood Social determinants of triple negative breast Cancer. Front. Public Health 7, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00018 (2019).
Babatunde, O. A. et al. Association between neighborhood social deprivation and stage at diagnosis among breast cancer patients in South Carolina. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211824 (2021).
Pampel, F. C., Krueger, P. M. & Denney, J. T. Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102529 (2010).
Stimpson, J. P., Ju, H., Raji, M. A. & Eschbach, K. Neighborhood deprivation and health risk behaviors in NHANES III. Am. J. Health Behav. 31(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.2.215 (2007).
Evans, G. W. & Kantrowitz, E. Socioeconomic status and health: The potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu. Rev. Public Health 23, 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.112001.112349 (2002).
Diez Roux, A. V. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am. J. Public Health 91(11), 1783–1789. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.11.1783 (2001).
Riley, A. R. Neighborhood disadvantage, residential segregation, and beyond-lessons for studying structural racism and health. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 5(2), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-017-0378-5 (2018).
Diez Roux, A. V. & Mair, C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1186, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05333.x (2010).
Hill, T. D., Ross, C. E. & Angel, R. J. Neighborhood disorder, psychophysiological distress, and health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 46(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600204 (2005).
Senn, T. E., Walsh, J. L. & Carey, M. P. The mediating roles of perceived stress and health behaviors in the relation between objective, subjective, and neighborhood socioeconomic status and perceived health. Ann. Behav. Med. 48(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-014-9591-1 (2014).
Schulz, A. J. et al. Associations between socioeconomic status and allostatic load: Effects of neighborhood poverty and tests of mediating pathways. Am. J. Public Health 102(9), 1706–1714. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300412 (2012).
Boylan, J. M. & Robert, S. A. Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals. Soc. Sci. Med. 188, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.005 (2017).
Sundquist, K., Eriksson, U., Mezuk, B. & Ohlsson, H. Neighborhood walkability, deprivation and incidence of type 2 diabetes: A population-based study on 512,061 Swedish adults. Health Place 31, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.011 (2015).
O’Neill, S. C. et al. Engaging in health behaviors to lower risk for breast cancer recurrence. PLoS ONE 8(1), e53607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053607 (2013).
Paxton, R. J., Garner, W., Dean, L. T., Logan, G. & Allen-Watts, K. Health behaviors and lifestyle interventions in African American breast cancer survivors: A review. Front. Oncol. 9, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00003 (2019).
Koual, M. et al. Environmental chemicals, breast cancer progression and drug resistance. Environ. Health 19(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00670-2 (2020).
Zhao, H., Song, R., Ye, Y., Chow, W. H. & Shen, J. Allostatic score and its associations with demographics, healthy behaviors, tumor characteristics, and mitochondrial DNA among breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 187(2), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06102-0 (2021).
Ennour-Idrissi, K., Maunsell, E. & Diorio, C. Telomere length and breast cancer prognosis: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 26(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0343 (2017).
Boyne, D. J. et al. Physical activity, global DNA methylation, and breast cancer risk: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 27(11), 1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0175 (2018).
Zhao, H. et al. Breast cancer risk in relation to plasma metabolites among Hispanic and African American women. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 176(3), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05165-4 (2019).
Kind, A. J. H. & Buckingham, W. R. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible - the neighborhood atlas. N. Engl. J. Med. 378(26), 2456–2458. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1802313 (2018).
Zhao, H. et al. Social-demographics, health behaviors, and telomere length in the Mexican American Mano a Mano Cohort. Oncotarget 8(57), 96553–96567. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19903 (2017).
Shen, J. et al. Global methylation of blood leukocyte DNA and risk of melanoma. Int. J. Cancer 140(7), 1503–1509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30577 (2017).
Kane, A. E. & Sinclair, D. A. Epigenetic changes during aging and their reprogramming potential. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 54(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409238.2019.1570075 (2019).
Alavian-Ghavanini, A. & Ruegg, J. Understanding epigenetic effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals: From mechanisms to novel test methods. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 122(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12878 (2018).
Rattan, S. & Flaws, J. A. The epigenetic impacts of endocrine disruptors on female reproduction across generationsdagger. Biol. Reprod. 101(3), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioz081 (2019).
Mychasiuk, R., Muhammad, A. & Kolb, B. Chronic stress induces persistent changes in global DNA methylation and gene expression in the medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and hippocampus. Neuroscience 322, 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.053 (2016).
Coker, E. S., Gunier, R., Huen, K., Holland, N. & Eskenazi, B. DNA methylation and socioeconomic status in a Mexican-American birth cohort. Clin. Epigenetics 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0494-z (2018).
Smith, J. A. et al. Neighborhood characteristics influence DNA methylation of genes involved in stress response and inflammation: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Epigenetics 12(8), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2017.1341026 (2017).
Lawrence, K. G. et al. Association of neighborhood deprivation with epigenetic aging using 4 clock metrics. JAMA Netw. Open. 3(11), e2024329. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24329 (2020).
Ribeiro, A. I., Amaro, J., Lisi, C. & Fraga, S. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and allostatic load: A scoping review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061092 (2018).
Ribeiro, A. I. et al. Neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and allostatic load: A multi-cohort study. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 8790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45432-4 (2019).
Powell-Wiley, T. M. et al. The relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and telomere length: The 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. SSM Popul. Health 10, 100517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100517 (2020).
Needham, B. L. et al. Neighborhood characteristics and leukocyte telomere length: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Health Place 28, 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.04.009 (2014).
Gebreab, S. Y. et al. Perceived neighborhood problems are associated with shorter telomere length in African American women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.03.018 (2016).
Park, M., Verhoeven, J. E., Cuijpers, P., Reynolds, C. F. III. & Penninx, B. W. Where you live may make you old: The association between perceived poor neighborhood quality and leukocyte telomere length. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0128460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128460 (2015).
Theall, K. P., Brett, Z. H., Shirtcliff, E. A., Dunn, E. C. & Drury, S. S. Neighborhood disorder and telomeres: Connecting children’s exposure to community level stress and cellular response. Soc. Sci. Med. 85, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.030 (2013).
Urquidi, V., Tarin, D. & Goodison, S. Telomerase in cancer: Clinical applications. Ann. Med. 30(5), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853899809002483 (1998).
Zhu, X. et al. The association between telomere length and cancer risk in population studies. Sci. Rep. 6, 22243. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22243 (2016).
Anderson, R. T. et al. Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in Appalachia: Does geography matter?. Health Serv. Res. 49(2), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12108 (2014).
Babatunde, O. A. et al. Racial disparities and diagnosis-to-treatment time among patients diagnosed with breast cancer in South Carolina. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00935-z (2021).
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by U01 CA179655 from NCI/NIH (Zhao) and American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant (ACS-IRG) (Shen).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.S. performed the molecular analysis and drafted the manuscript. B.F.F., W.H.C., and H.Z. initiated the study. H.Z. performed the data analysis. V.B.S. and H.D.B. reviewed the manuscript. R.S. performed the molecular analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shen, J., Fuemmeler, B.F., Sheppard, V.B. et al. Neighborhood disadvantage and biological aging biomarkers among breast cancer patients. Sci Rep 12, 11006 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15260-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15260-0
This article is cited by
-
Health-related quality of life over chemotherapy course among individuals with early-stage breast cancer: the association of social determinants of health and neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage
Supportive Care in Cancer (2024)
-
Association between allostatic load and breast cancer risk: a cohort study
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
-
Mediation of the association between disadvantaged neighborhoods and cortical microstructure by body mass index
Communications Medicine (2023)
-
Effects of neighborhood disadvantage on cortisol and interviewer-rated anxiety symptoms in breast cancer patients initiating treatment
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2023)
-
The impact of social and environmental factors on cancer biology in Black Americans
Cancer Causes & Control (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
