Abstract
Existing research on the security of the supply of critical materials for clean energy generally aggregates information at the country level, a practice that obscures the extensive role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the production of critical materials. FDI refers to an ownership stake in a company or project by an overseas investor. Here we establish a database for global mining of lithium, cobalt, nickel and platinum at company level, covering 240 countries and regions. We show that 47% of lithium, 71% of cobalt, 41% of nickel and 34% of platinum mined in 2019 were under FDI. We then explore how FDI may affect supply risks by proposing a supply risk index that allocates production of the critical materials to the country of origin of investors instead of the country where production is located. We present upper and lower bounds of the supply risk index that reflect scenarios where either all investors or only state investors prioritize the home-country demand, respectively. This study presents an approach for assessing the national supply risks of critical materials, considering the geographical allocation of FDI.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The information on country affiliation of companies is from the ORBIS database of Bureau van Dijk58. The ownership hierarchy of mine owners and stakeholders was collected from annual reports, public statements and news reports of relevant companies, consulting groups and information services platforms. Geographical production and international trade of four materials are from the United Nations Comtrade database54, United States Geological Survey Reports14 and our previous studies8,19,36,37,66. Source data are available in Supplementary Information.
References
World Energy Outlook 2021 (International Energy Agency, 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2021
2022 Final List of Critical Minerals (US Geological Survey, Department of the Interior, 2023); https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/02/24/2022-04027/2022-final-list-of-critical-minerals
Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023 – Final Report (European Commission, 2020); https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/57318397-fdd4-11ed-a05c-01aa75ed71a1
The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions (International Energy Agency, 2021).
Schrijvers, D. et al. A review of methods and data to determine raw material criticality. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 155, 104617 (2020).
Tian, X. et al. Features of critical resource trade networks of lithium-ion batteries. Resour. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102177 (2021).
Rui, X., Geng, Y., Sun, X., Hao, H. & Xiao, S. Dynamic material flow analysis of natural graphite in China for 2001–2018. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105732 (2021).
Xun, D. et al. Mapping global fuel cell vehicle industry chain and assessing potential supply risks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 15097–15109 (2021).
Geng, J. et al. Static material flow analysis of neodymium in China. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 114–124 (2020).
Ali, S. H. et al. Mineral supply for sustainable development requires resource governance. Nature 543, 367–372 (2017).
Goldthau, A. & Hughes, L. Protect global supply chains for low-carbon technologies. Nature 585, 28–30 (2020).
Pell, R. et al. Towards sustainable extraction of technology materials through integrated approaches. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 665–679 (2021).
Bauer, C. et al. Charging sustainable batteries. Nat. Sustain. 5, 176–178 (2022).
Mineral Commodity Summaries 2023 (United States Geological Survey, 2023); https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs
Sun, X., Liu, Z., Zhao, F. & Hao, H. Global competition in the lithium-ion battery supply chain: a novel perspective for criticality analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 12180–12190 (2021).
Hao, H., Liu, Z., Zhao, F., Geng, Y. & Sarkis, J. Material flow analysis of lithium in China. Resour. Policy 51, 100–106 (2017).
Liu, G. & Muller, D. B. Mapping the global journey of anthropogenic aluminum: a trade-linked multilevel material flow analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11873–11881 (2013).
Nansai, K. et al. Global flows of critical metals necessary for low-carbon technologies: the case of neodymium, cobalt, and platinum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 1391–1400 (2014).
Sun, X., Hao, H., Zhao, F. & Liu, Z. Global lithium flow 1994–2015: implications for improving resource efficiency and security. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 2827–2834 (2018).
Nansai, K. et al. Global mining risk footprint of critical metals necessary for low-carbon technologies: the case of neodymium, cobalt, and platinum in Japan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 2022–2031 (2015).
Sun, X., Hao, H., Hartmann, P., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. Supply risks of lithium-ion battery materials: an entire supply chain estimation. Mater. Today Energy 14, 100347 (2019).
Yan, W. et al. Rethinking Chinese supply resilience of critical metals in lithium-ion batteries. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120719 (2020).
Greenwood, M., Wentker, M. & Leker, J. A region-specific raw material and lithium-ion battery criticality methodology with an assessment of NMC cathode technology. Appl. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117512 (2021).
van den Brink, S., Kleijn, R., Sprecher, B. & Tukker, A. Identifying supply risks by mapping the cobalt supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104743 (2020).
Zhong, W. et al. Structure of international iron flow: based on substance flow analysis and complex network. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 136, 345–354 (2018).
Li, X. & Gallagher, K. P. Assessing the climate change exposure of foreign direct investment. Nat. Commun. 13, 1451 (2022).
Global Locations (Livent, 2020); https://livent.com/company-overview/global-locations/#
Trost, J. N. & Dunn, J. B. Assessing the feasibility of the Inflation Reduction Act’s EV critical mineral targets. Nat. Sustain. 6, 639 (2023).
Jain, E. & Obayashi, Y. Lynas gets $134 million funding from Japan to boost output. mining.com https://www.mining.com/web/lynas-gets-134-million-funding-from-japan-to-boost-output/ (2023).
Ericsson, M., Löf, O. & Löf, A. Chinese control over African and global mining—past, present and future. Miner. Econ. 33, 153–181 (2020).
Gulley, A. L., McCullough, E. A. & Shedd, K. B. China’s domestic and foreign influence in the global cobalt supply chain. Resour. Policy 62, 317–323 (2019).
Kaplinsky, R. & Morris, M. Chinese FDI in sub-Saharan Africa: engaging with large dragons. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 21, 551–569 (2009).
Koyama, K. & Krane, J. Energy security through FDI: the legacy of early Japanese investment in the oil sectors of the Persian Gulf. Resour. Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102165 (2021).
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G. & Fu, X. Lithium-ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals. Joule 1, 229–243 (2017).
Sun, X., Ouyang, M. & Hao, H. Surging lithium price will not impede the electric vehicle boom. Joule 6, 1738–1742 (2022).
Sun, X., Hao, H., Zhao, F. & Liu, Z. Tracing global lithium flow: a trade-linked material flow analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 124, 50–61 (2017).
Sun, X., Hao, H., Liu, Z., Zhao, F. & Song, J. Tracing global cobalt flow: 1995–2015. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 149, 45–55 (2019).
Sun, X., Hao, H., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. Insights into the global flow pattern of manganese. Resour. Policy 65, 101578 (2020).
Xun, D., Hao, H., Sun, X., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. End-of-life recycling rates of platinum group metals in the automotive industry: insight into regional disparities. J. Clean. Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121942 (2020).
Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (US Department of Justice, 2018); https://www.justice.gov/atr/herfindahl-hirschman-index
International Trade in Resources: A Biophysical Assessment (United Nations Environment Programme, 2015); https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/7427
Sustainable Trade in Resources: Global Material Flows, Circularity and Trade (United Nations Environment Programme, 2020); https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/sustainable-trade-resources
World Investment Report 2023 (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2023); https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2023_en.pdf
Wang, Q. et al. Urban mining of lithium: prospects, challenges and policy recommendations. Sci. Technol. Rev. 38, 6–15 (2020).
Melin, H. E. et al. Global implications of the EU battery regulation. Science 373, 384–387 (2021).
Bhargav, A., He, J., Gupta, A. & Manthiram, A. Lithium-sulfur batteries: attaining the critical metrics. Joule 4, 285–291 (2020).
Beuse, M., Steffen, B. & Schmidt, T. S. Projecting the competition between energy-storage technologies in the electricity sector. Joule 4, 2162–2184 (2020).
Sun, X., Liu, G., Hao, H., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. Modeling potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic on global electric vehicle supply chain. iScience 25, 103903 (2022).
Country Codes – ISO 3166 (International Organization for Standardization, 2013); https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search
2015 Minerals Yearbook Cobalt (United States Geological Survey, 2017); https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cobalt
2015 Minerals Yearbook Nickel (United States Geological Survey, 2017); https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/nickel/
2016 Minerals Yearbook Lithium (United States Geological Survey, 2018); https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/lithium/
2017 Minerals Yearbook Platinum Group Metal (United States Geological Survey, 2020); https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/platinum-group-metals-statistics-and-information
Trade Data (United Nations Comtrade, 2020); https://comtrade.un.org/data/
Trade Statistics (Korea Customs Service, 2020); http://www.customs.go.kr/kcshome/trade
Import and Export Data (China Customs Information Network, 2020); http://www.haiguan.info/
Customs Data Enquiry (Trade Social Networking Service, 2021); https://www.tradesns.com/en
ORBIS - Company Information Across The Globe (Bureau van Dijk, 2020).
Li, P., Liu, Q., Zhou, P. & Li, Y. Mapping global platinum supply chain and assessing potential supply risks. Front. Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1033220 (2023).
Helbig, C. et al. Extending the geopolitical supply risk indicator: application of life cycle sustainability assessment to the petrochemical supply chain of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers. J. Clean. Prod. 137, 1170–1178 (2016).
Gemechu, E. D., Helbig, C., Sonnemann, G., Thorenz, A. & Tuma, A. Import-based indicator for the geopolitical supply risk of raw materials in life cycle sustainability assessments. J. Ind. Ecol. 20, 154–165 (2016).
Nassar, N. T. et al. Evaluating the mineral commodity supply risk of the U.S. manufacturing sector. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay8647 (2020).
Szpiro, G. G. Hirschman versus Herfindahl: some topological properties for the use of concentration indexes. Math. Soc. Sci. 14, 299–302 (1987).
Worldwide Governance Indicator (World Bank, 2019); http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
Julio, M. & Elmira, A. Fraser Institute Annual: Survey of Mining Companies 2022 (Fraser Institute, 2023); https://www.fraserinstitute.org/sites/default/files/annual-survey-of-mining-companies-2022.pdf
Sun, X., Hao, H., Geng, Y., Liu, Z. & Zhao, F. Exploring the potential for improving material utilization efficiency to secure lithium supply for China’s battery supply chain. Fundam. Res. 4, 167–177 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72122010 to H.H., 72334001 to G.L., 71774100 to H.H., 71991484 to G.L.) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1908501 to H.H.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.S. and H.H. conceived the idea, conducted the analysis and wrote the paper. C.G., T.F. and G.L. wrote sections of the paper and provided guidance on the paper. D.X. and M.E. provided data for the analysis. I-Y.L.H., Z.L. and F.Z. reviewed and edited the paper. H.H. and G.L. supervised the work and secured funding for the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks Roderick Eggert, Maria Amélia Enriquez and Yosuke Shigetomi for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–14, Discussion and Tables 1–11.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, X., Hao, H., Galeazzi, C. et al. Reducing supply risk of critical materials for clean energy via foreign direct investment. Nat Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01329-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01329-3