Introduction

Patients with different mutations in the DNA repair/transcription helicase, XPD(ERCC2), may have markedly disparate autosomal recessive phenotypes, including trichothiodystrophy (TTD) or xeroderma pigmentosum (XP).1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 TTD patients have brittle hair, short stature, developmental delay and multisystem involvement without increased skin cancer risk.12 In contrast, XP patients have sun sensitivity, freckle-like skin pigmentation, a 10 000-fold increase in skin cancer, and 25% have progressive neurologic degeneration.12, 13 At the National Institutes of Health (NIH), we have examined XP patients since 1971 and TTD patients since 2001 as part of a natural history protocol.7, 13

Our review of all English-language-published case reports of TTD patients found 112 TTD patients, of whom 55% had abnormal characteristics at birth and 28% had maternal pregnancy complications.14 We then conducted two molecular epidemiological studies of pregnancy and neonatal abnormalities in mothers of TTD patients in our clinic.15, 16 We found that 81% of these pregnancies had complications, including 56% with preterm delivery, 30% with pre-eclampsia and 11% with hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome.16 The TTD patients had mutations in TTD-A(GTF2H5) or TTDN1(C7orf11) in addition to XPD and unknown genes. In contrast, our 1987 review of all English-language-published case reports of XP patients did not identify a large number of pregnancy abnormalities in 830 XP case reports.17 These patients had mutations in at least 8 different genes involved in nucleotide excision repair and polymerase function.7 In order to determine the influence of the XPD gene, we now have conducted a molecular epidemiological study of pregnancy and neonatal abnormalities in the mothers of the XP patients with XPD mutations in our protocol. We compared these new data to that of the mothers of the TTD patients with XPD mutations from our earlier studies15, 16 and found large differences.

Materials and methods

We performed a systematic study of the mothers of the XP patients enrolled in our NIH protocol using the same methods that we used for study of the mothers of TTD patients.15, 16 In short, we examined XP-affected children’s pediatric records and noted birth weights and lengths, evidence of abnormal characteristics at birth and need for NICU admission. We specifically questioned the mothers of XP patients with XPD mutations in our protocol13 regarding their pregnancies either in person during the NIH evaluation or by follow-up phone call or e-mail. We inquired about the length of gestation, presence of hypertensive disorders during the pregnancy and any newborn complications in the XP-affected offspring.

Results

Mutations in the XPD gene were present in 17 of the TTD patients in our studies15, 16 (Table 1). Ninety-four percent (16/17) of these TTD pregnancies with XPD mutations had pregnancy and/or neonatal complications. Eighty-eight percent were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) primarily for problems related to prematurity and low birth weight.

Table 1 Pregnancy and neonatal complications in mothers of TTD or XP patients with XPD mutations

Since 1971, we examined 23 XP patients with XPD mutations at NIH.13 We were able to contact 13 mothers of 17 of these XP patients (Table 1). None of the pregnancies with XP-affected children had symptoms of pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, pre-term delivery, low birth weight or small for gestational age. However, two XP neonates were admitted to the NICU. One had ABO incompatibility, which occurs in approximately 6.9% of normal pregnancies.18 The second XP infant initially did well after birth, but was admitted to the NICU at 10 days of age secondary to developing streptococcal meningitis. Neither of these complications was noted in the TTD neonates.

These differences in pregnancy or neonatal complications between pregnancies with defects in XPD resulting in TTD-affected children (16/17 with complications) or in XP-affected children (0/17 with complications) are statistically significant (P<0.0001) (Table 1). The frequency of NICU admissions among XP neonates was smaller (P<0.0001) than for TTD neonates.

Discussion

Moslehi et al19 recently reported a literature review of the relationship of mutations in the DNA repair/transcription gene, XPD, with human prenatal development. They claim ‘Gestational complications were first reported to be … associated with TTD based on our novel clinical observations…’. However, Pollit et al20 described gestational complications including toxemia of pregnancy in 1968. In addition, in attempting to evaluate the analysis by Moslehi and colleagues associating mutations in the C-terminal motif of XPD with TTD prenatal complications, we were unable to find mutation information in two of the three references cited.15, 21

Our XP and TTD patients had XPD mutations that are similar to those previously published.1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 All of our XP and TTD patients were compound heterozygotes for two different XPD mutations. Many XP patients had the common p.R683W mutation combined with other mutations.2, 5, 6 In the TTD patients, the mutations involve the C-terminal region (p.A725T in TTD421BE, p.E731Rfs*14 in TTD355BE and p.R722W in TTD351BE) as well as other locations in the XPD protein.2, 22 The pregnancies yielding patients TTD421BE and TTD355BE had pre-eclampsia, but the pregnancy yielding patient TTD351BE did not have pre-eclampsia.16 Thus, mutations in the C-terminal region of the XPD protein are not always associated with pre-eclampsia. Perhaps the outcome is influenced by which allele is maternal and which is paternal in these pregnancies.

There are several reasons why we believe that the prediction by Moslehi et al 19 that mutations in the C-terminal region of XPD8, 9, 10 cause pre-eclampsia may not be correct. There is a complex genotype–phenotype relationship between the location of mutations in the human XPD gene and the presence or absence of clinical features of XP or TTD. Mutations are spread out along the 761 amino-acid structure of XPD in both disorders1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 The mutations may affect nucleotide-excision repair and/or transcription to different extents.2, 3 In addition, some mutations are found in both XP and TTD patients. As XPD is an essential part of the basal transcription factor TFIIH, complete absence of this protein is not compatible with life. Some alleles have been considered as null, with no activity for some functions.5 However, XPD has multiple functions and there is evidence that both XPD alleles contribute to the overall phenotype.6

We previously reported on a patient with COFS/TTD (TTD373BE) having p.D681N and p.R616W mutations that were not in the C-terminal region but were near the common p.R683W XP-associated mutation.23 The pregnancy had pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, preterm delivery and low birth weight.15 An infant reported to have COFS syndrome had these same two XPD mutations and was born at 37 weeks, weighing only 1.4 kg.24 However, these authors did not report pregnancy-related abnormalities or whether the hair of this patient had the typical features of TTD (tiger-tail banding with polarized microscopy12), hence we do not know if this patient also had COFS/TTD. COFS is closely related to Cockayne syndrome (CS) type II and both may be associated with low birth weight.25, 26, 27 COFS can be caused by mutations in several nucleotide excision repair genes: CSB(ERCC6), XPG(ERCC5), or ERCC1 in addition to XPD.25 However, a comprehensive literature review of 140 CS cases did not report severe pregnancy complications in any of the forms of CS.27

Because most TTD and XP patients are compound heterozygotes, it is difficult to ascribe a clinical phenotype to a single mutation. As TTD is an autosomal recessive disorder, the mothers of the XPD-affected patients are obligate heterozygotes. Specific maternal mutations may influence the risk for prenatal complications. If the embryo is affected, then the developing fetus and the placenta also have a second mutated allele, resulting in a high frequency of pregnancy abnormalities. In contrast, in XP-affected pregnancies the XPD mutations are not associated with pregnancy complications. Thus, there appears to be specificity in the effects of the mutations in the XPD gene leading to pre-eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and impaired neonatal development. As mutations in XPD may have differential effects on DNA repair2 and on transcription,3 these observations should provide insights into the role of XPD in human pregnancy and fetal development.