Persistent TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage causes cell and developmental failure

Muniesa-Vargas, Alba; Davó-Martínez, Carlota; Ribeiro-Silva, Cristina; van der Woude, Melanie; Thijssen, Karen L.; Haspels, Ben; Häckes, David; Kaynak, Ülkem U.; Kanaar, Roland; Marteijn, Jurgen A.; Theil, Arjan F.; Kuijten, Maayke M. P.; Vermeulen, Wim; Lans, Hannes

doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47935-9

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 25 April 2024

Persistent TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage causes cell and developmental failure

Nature Communications volume 15, Article number: 3490 (2024) Cite this article

896 Accesses
6 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Congenital nucleotide excision repair (NER) deficiency gives rise to several cancer-prone and/or progeroid disorders. It is not understood how defects in the same DNA repair pathway cause different disease features and severity. Here, we show that the absence of functional ERCC1-XPF or XPG endonucleases leads to stable and prolonged binding of the transcription/DNA repair factor TFIIH to DNA damage, which correlates with disease severity and induces senescence features in human cells. In vivo, in C. elegans, this prolonged TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage causes developmental arrest and neuronal dysfunction, in a manner dependent on transcription-coupled NER. NER factors XPA and TTDA both promote stable TFIIH DNA binding and their depletion therefore suppresses these severe phenotypical consequences. These results identify stalled NER intermediates as pathogenic to cell functionality and organismal development, which can in part explain why mutations in XPF or XPG cause different disease features than mutations in XPA or TTDA.

Neuronal enhancers are hotspots for DNA single-strand break repair

Article 25 March 2021

H3K4me2 regulates the recovery of protein biosynthesis and homeostasis following DNA damage

Article 12 October 2020

p53 regulates diverse tissue-specific outcomes to endogenous DNA damage in mice

Article Open access 21 March 2024

Introduction

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair pathway that promotes genome stability by removing a wide range of different lesions that distort the DNA helical structure^1,2. Lesions repaired by NER arise from exposure to different genotoxic agents encountered in daily life, including metabolism-derived and environmental reactive chemicals and UV light from the sun. The core NER pathway is well characterized and can be summarized in four sequential steps: 1) lesion detection, 2) DNA unwinding and damage verification, 3) excision of a single-stranded DNA stretch containing the lesion and 4) DNA synthesis and ligation to restore the gap. Lesions are detected throughout the genome, by the concerted activity of the CRL4^DDB2 and XPC-RAD23B-CETN2 complexes, in a subpathway termed global genome NER (GG-NER)^3,4. Alternatively, lesions can also be detected through transcription-coupled NER (TC-NER), where obstructed transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) leads to the stable binding of the DNA translocase CSB to lesion-stalled Pol II and recruitment of the CRL4^CSA and UVSSA-USP7 complexes^5,6.

Following lesion detection, both subpathways converge to the same central NER machinery, starting with the recruitment of the Transcription Factor IIH (TFIIH) complex⁷. TFIIH consists of a 7-subunit core complex, comprised of ERCC2/XPD, ERCC3/XPB, GTF2H1/p62, GTF2H2/p44, GTF2H3/p34, GTF2H4/p52 and GTF2H5/TTDA, and a 3-subunit CDK-activating kinase (CAK) subcomplex. Recruitment of TFIIH to DNA damage is mediated by an interaction between p62 and XPB with either XPC, in GG-NER, or UVSSA, in TC-NER^8,9,10,11. The arrival of TFIIH stabilizes the binding of XPC to DNA and coincides with CRL4^DDB2 dissociation¹². DNA double helix opening by ATPases XPB and XPD, whose 5’−3’ helicase/translocase activity is blocked by DNA damage, serves to scan for the presence of a lesion and creates a suitable bubble substrate for subsequent endonucleolytic incision^13,14,15. Together with TFIIH, XPA and RPA are recruited, which, based on in vitro assays, are thought to interact with and coordinate DNA incision by the ERCC1-XPF and XPG endonucleases^16,17,18. Furthermore, XPA stimulates XPD helicase activity in vitro by promoting the release of the CAK subcomplex from TFIIH and may thus also serve as an auxiliary factor in damage verification^15,19,20. ERCC1-XPF and XPG coordinately incise the DNA 5’ and 3’ from the lesion once a proper DNA substrate is formed through the stable binding of the NER incision complex consisting of TFIIH, RPA, XPA, ERCC1-XPF and XPG^21,22,23. This is followed by the dissociation of TFIIH and other incision complex factors with help from the HLTF translocase²⁴. The resulting single-stranded DNA gap is finally restored by de novo DNA synthesis and ligation²⁵.

Hereditary NER defects cause several rare autosomal recessive pleiotropic diseases with widely varying phenotypic expression²⁶. Mutations in genes XPA to XPG can cause xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), whereas mutations in CSA and CSB can cause Cockayne syndrome (CS) or, together with mutations in UVSSA, UV-sensitive syndrome. XP is characterized by photosensitivity, pigmentation abnormalities, and a very high risk of developing cancer²⁷. Additionally, some XP patients develop progressive neurodegeneration. CS, on the other hand, is characterized by severe growth failure, progressive neurodegeneration, and segmental progeroid features but not by cancer predisposition²⁸. UV-sensitive syndrome is characterized by mild photosensitivity of the skin. Mutations in some genes of the NER incision complex, i.e., in XPB, XPD, XPF and XPG, can cause a syndrome with combined features of XP and CS referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome (XPCS) complex, or, in its most severe form, as cerebro-oculo-facio-skeletal syndrome (COFS)^29,30. Moreover, other mutations in TFIIH genes XPB, XPD and TTDA can cause a photosensitive form of the Trichothiodystrophy (TTD) syndrome, which is characterized by brittle hair and nails, developmental delay and cognitive decline^31,32. Typically, mutations in XPA never give rise to XPCS, although they can cause a severe form of XP combined with growth failure and progressive neurodegeneration that is sometimes referred to as DeSanctis Cacchione (DSC) syndrome³³. It is not entirely clear why mutations in the same DNA repair pathway, and even in the same gene, cause the different symptoms associated with each different disorder, which range in severity from mild to very severe (with mortality at young age). It is thought that symptoms affecting terminally differentiated tissues in TTD patients are derived from gene expression problems due to TFIIH instability³¹ and that cancer predisposition in XP is caused by mutation accumulation due to reduced GG-NER activity²⁷. However, the pathogenesis of other symptoms, in particularly those associated with CS and affecting the nervous system, likely entails additional mechanisms. Indeed, besides NER deficiency also defects in other DNA repair pathways, transcription, stress responses and/or mitochondria have been linked to CS^5,34,35,36.

We previously observed that the central NER machinery is continuously targeted to DNA damage in cells harboring XPCS-causative XPF mutations and postulated that accumulation of DNA repair intermediates may interfere with transcription and/or replication and could be causative for CS-related neurodegenerative symptoms^5,37. Here, we aimed to further clarify the molecular pathology underlying XPCS. We studied differences between cells lacking XPA or TTDA and cells lacking XPF or XPG, which could help explain why mutations in the NER incision complex factors XPA and TTDA are never associated with CS features. We show that both XPA and TTDA promote the stable binding of TFIIH to DNA damage, whereas ERCC1-XPF and XPG nucleolytic activity promotes its dissociation. As a result, TFIIH is stably and more persistently bound to DNA damage in cells without proper DNA damage excision. Our results suggest that this persistent TFIIH binding induces senescence features in cultured cells and, as we show using C. elegans as model system³⁸, leads to TC-NER-dependent functional impairment of differentiated neurons in vivo.

Results

XPA and XPF/XPG differentially influence TFIIH binding to DNA damage

To investigate the mechanistic differences in NER between cells lacking XPA and cells lacking ERCC1-XPF or XPG function, we determined how the loss of these NER factors affects TFIIH association with DNA damage. To this end, we made use of previously generated GFP-XPB MRC-5 knock-in (KI) fibroblasts, in which a GFP tag is fused to the N-terminus of the endogenous TFIIH subunit XPB¹². The dynamic cellular properties of the endogenous TFIIH complex, and how these change in response to UV radiation, were determined by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments. In FRAP, incomplete fluorescence recovery in a region of interest indicates that a fraction of GFP-tagged factors is immobilized, which in the case of TFIIH after UV-irradiation reflects its binding to DNA damage during NER^12,39,40. In cells treated with control siRNA (siCTRL), a fraction of TFIIH indeed became immobilized immediately after UV irradiation, indicating that a significant fraction of TFIIH molecules was active in NER (Fig. 1A–C). The fraction of immobilized TFIIH was decreased when FRAP experiments were conducted 3 h after UV irradiation, because of ongoing repair of the DNA damage (Supplementary Fig. 1A; Fig. 1C). However, in cells in which XPF or XPG were depleted (Supplementary Fig. 1B), TFIIH showed a strikingly larger UV-induced immobile fraction, which was still observed 3 h after UV irradiation. These results indicate that in the absence of DNA damage excision TFIIH binds longer to DNA damage. In sharp contrast, XPA depletion led to a smaller UV-dependent immobile fraction of TFIIH than the control condition, both immediately and 3 h after UV irradiation (Fig. 1B, C; Supplementary Fig. 1B, C). Altogether, these data indicate that XPA stabilizes TFIIH binding to DNA damage and that XPF and XPG stimulate TFIIH dissociation.

**Fig. 1: TFIIH-DNA damage binding differs between XPA and XPF or XPG deficient cells.**

XPA promotes the formation of a stable NER incision complex

The UV-induced immobile fraction of TFIIH in cells with XPA depletion diminished in time, similar to control siRNA-treated cells, indicating that residual repair likely still takes place due to incomplete XPA knockdown. We, therefore, generated cells with XPA or XPF knockout (KO) alleles expressing fluorescent TFIIH, to corroborate our RNAi-based results and to test if the strong UV-induced retention of TFIIH in UV-treated XPF deficient cells is XPA dependent. We knocked out XPA in the GFP-XPB KI MRC-5 cell line (Supplementary Fig. 1D) and knocked in GFP at the endogenous XPB locus in wild-type U2OS cells and in previously generated XPF KO U2OS cells³⁷ (Supplementary Fig. 1E, F).

Similar to siRNA-mediated XPA depletion, the fraction of TFIIH molecules bound to DNA damage immediately after UV exposure was lower in XPA KO cells than in XPA proficient (or WT) cells (Fig. 1D-F). Moreover, also 3 h after UV irradiation showed a higher percentage of TFIIH molecules bound to DNA in the XPA KO cells, likely due to repeated binding in the complete absence of repair in these cells. Strikingly, depletion of XPF in XPA KO cells did not lead to increased TFIIH binding to chromatin (Fig. 1E, F), contrary to the strong GFP-XPB immobilization in wild-type MRC-5 cells after XPF depletion (Fig. 1A, C). FRAP in wild-type U2OS cells also showed a clear UV-induced immobilization of GFP-XPB, which was reduced upon XPA depletion but enhanced upon XPF KO (Fig. 1G–I). Interestingly, the enhanced GFP-XPB immobilization in XPF KO cells was prevented by XPA depletion. These data indicate that the prolonged stable binding of TFIIH in the absence of DNA damage excision depends on XPA, and that XPA is crucial for the formation of a stable incision complex. Consequently, XPF deficiency does not influence TFIIH binding to DNA damage in XPA deficient cells.

XPA deficiency prevents TFIIH stalling in excision deficient cells

To independently substantiate these FRAP results, we assessed the loading of endogenous non-tagged TFIIH onto damaged chromatin in wild-type and XPF KO U2OS cells, in the presence and absence of XPA, at an early (30 min) and late (3 h) time point after UV irradiation by cell fractionation. Both XPB and XPD TFIIH subunits showed an increased and continuous binding to damaged chromatin in XPF KO cells but not in wild-type cells (Fig. 2A). XPA depletion reduced the binding of TFIIH to damaged chromatin in both wild-type and XPF KO cells, in accordance with the FRAP data, and prevented continuous TFIIH binding in XPF KO cells.

**Fig. 2: Prolonged TFIIH binding to damaged chromatin in XPF deficient cells is prevented by XPA loss.**

To further corroborate these findings, we compared the dissociation of TFIIH from DNA damage by inverse fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (iFRAP). To this end, using a microporous filter we locally UV-irradiated the GFP-XPB KI wild-type U2OS cells and GFP-XPB KI XPF KO U2OS cells to induce steady-state accumulation of GFP-XPB at local UV damage (LUD). Subsequently, the nuclear fluorescent signal outside the LUD was continuously bleached, and the fluorescence decay over time in the LUD was measured to assess TFIIH residence time at damaged DNA (Fig. 2B). GFP-XPB dissociation in XPF KO cells was slower compared to that in wild-type cells, showing that TFIIH resides significantly longer at DNA damage in the absence of an incision (Fig. 2C, D). Conversely, GFP-XPB dissociation was faster upon XPA depletion, both in XPF proficient cells and in XPF KO cells, showing that TFIIH resides shorter at DNA damage in the absence of XPA. Together, these data confirm that XPA promotes the stable binding of TFIIH to damaged chromatin and demonstrate that the increased UV-induced TFIIH immobilization in excision deficient cells observed with FRAP is due to prolonged TFIIH binding to DNA damage.

TFIIH stalling correlates with the severity of cellular impairment and NER disease symptoms

Given the difference of TFIIH-DNA binding kinetics to DNA damage in XPA compared to XPF and XPG deficient cells, we wondered if prolonged TFIIH binding impairs cell function. Therefore, we first tested if the degree of TFIIH stalling correlates with the severity of NER diseases caused by different XPF mutations. We stably transduced mCherry-tagged wild-type XPF (WT) and three disease-associated mutant XPF cDNA constructs, encoding P379S mutant XPF, associated with mild XP, R799W mutant XPF, associated with more severe XP including progressive neurodegeneration, and C236R mutant XPF, associated with the most severe XPCS complex, in GFP-XPB KI XPF KO U2OS cell lines (Fig. 2E)^37,41,42,43. FRAP analysis of the mobility of GFP-XPB after UV irradiation showed that expression of both WT and P379S mutant XPF led to a similar level of TFIIH association with damaged chromatin (Fig. 2F). However, expression of R799W mutant XPF caused increased TFIIH binding to damaged DNA (Fig. 2G), and TFIIH-DNA binding was even more pronounced in cells that expressed the C236R mutant XPF construct (Fig. 2H, I). Previous in vitro incision assays showed that C236R, but not R799W, strongly reduces XPF’s nucleolytic activity^42,44. These results, therefore, reveal that disease-associated mutations in XPF that differ in severity and catalytic activity, also differentially impact TFIIH binding to DNA damage, and that, intriguingly, the degree of TFIIH stalling correlates with the severity of the disease.

Subsequently, we investigated if cellular phenotypes due to ERCC1-XPF or XPG deficiency can be suppressed by additional XPA deficiency, thus preventing TFIIH stalling. We first determined if XPA and XPF deficiency differentially affect DNA damage-induced transcription inhibition. As loss of XPA and XPF impairs the repair of transcription-blocking DNA lesions, this also limits the recovery of RNA synthesis after UV irradiation. We knocked out XPA in wild-type and XPF KO U2OS cells by CRISPR/Cas9 (Supplementary Fig. 1G) and measured recovery of RNA synthesis by fluorescently visualizing 5-ethynyl-uridine incorporation into nascent RNA⁴⁵. Strikingly, this showed that XPF KO leads to a slightly stronger recovery of RNA synthesis defect than XPA KO and that XPA KO suppressed this stronger defect (Fig. 3A). In contrast, we confirmed that XPA, XPF or XPG KO or double XPA and XPF KO equally leads to a complete impairment of NER activity, as shown by the complete absence of 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine incorporation into DNA, as measured by Unscheduled DNA Synthesis⁴⁵, after UV irradiation (Supplementary Fig. 1H). Therefore, these results suggest that possibly the increased TFIIH stalling at DNA damage in XPF KO cells contributes to the stronger impairment of transcriptional activity observed in these cells. To determine if this transcriptional impairment correlates with a difference in the level of lesion-induced Pol II stalling, we performed FRAP in previously generated KI U2OS cells in which the GFP variant mClover is fused to endogenous CSB⁴⁶. The translocase CSB stably binds to lesion-stalled Pol II. Therefore, CSB immobilization, as measured by FRAP, is a very sensitive indicator of DNA damage-induced Pol II stalling^46,47. Indeed, we observed clear immobilization of a fraction of CSB-mClover molecules after UV irradiation, but this fraction was comparable in cells treated with control siRNA or with siRNAs targeting XPA, XPF or XPG (Fig. 3B, C). These results suggest that increased transcriptional impairment due to XPF deficiency, compared to XPA deficiency, is not due to differences in Pol II stalling.

**Fig. 3: XPA loss suppresses transcriptional and senescence features due to XPF or XPG deficiency.**

Endogenous DNA damage accumulation due to ERCC1-XPF or XPG deficiency, but not XPA deficiency, causes cellular senescence in mouse models and expression of senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors such as IL6 in human fibroblasts. These DNA damage-induced senescence features are hypothesized to contribute to the progeroid features observed in NER disease^{48,49,50,51,52,53}. Therefore, we tested if XPA and XPG deficiency differentially affect endogenous DNA damage-induced changes in the expression of nuclear lamins, which is a biomarker for senescence induction^48,54, and in the expression of IL6, whose upregulation is associated with senescence induction⁵⁵. To measure changes in these markers, we stably expressed a lamin- and IL6-expression-based reporter system in wild-type and XPG KO U2OS cells (Supplementary Fig. 2A). This system encompasses translational reporters to measure changes in the expression and expression ratio of BFP-tagged lamin B1 and mScarlet-tagged lamin A, and a transcriptional reporter to measure changes in GFP expression driven by the IL6 promoter. The functionality of this system was confirmed by treating wild-type cells with doxorubicin, which is a genotoxic drug known to induce senescence features⁵⁶. Doxorubicin treatment caused a clear change in the expression and expression ratio of lamin B1 and lamin A, which we visualized by plotting the lamin B1 and lamin A fluorescence intensities and by plotting the proportion of cells with deviating lamin B1 and lamin A expression (Supplementary Fig. 2B–E). Doxorubicin treatment also led to an increased IL6 expression in cells, shown in the same graphs with a blue color to indicate IL-6 positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 2B and E). In XPG KO cells, we also observed clear changes in the expression of lamin B1 and lamin A and an induction of IL6 as compared to wild-type cells, which were more pronounced as compared to siXPA-treated cells (Figure 3Di, ii, iii; Supplementary Fig. 2E–I). Furthermore, XPA depletion reduced the perturbation of lamin B1 and lamin A expression and IL6 induction in XPG KO cells (Figure 3Div, E; Supplementary Fig. 2E–I). Together, these results suggest that preventing prolonged TFIIH binding by XPA deficiency effectively suppresses cellular defects and phenotypes caused by XPF or XPG deficiency.

XPA-1 deficiency suppresses neural dysfunction in C. elegans xpf-1 and xpg-1 mutants

To investigate if TFIIH stalling similarly impairs cell function in vivo, we studied TFIIH DNA damage recruitment and neuron functionality in XPF, XPG and XPA deficient C. elegans ^57,58,59,60. Previously, we generated KI animals with an auxin-inducible degradation (AID) tag⁶¹ and GFP fused to the TFIIH subunit GTF-2H1 (GTF2H1/p62 in humans)⁶², allowing us to visualize the recruitment of endogenous TFIIH to damaged DNA in vivo. TFIIH is rapidly recruited to UV-damaged chromosome pairs in oocytes of wild-type animals and dissociates within ~30 min due to efficient repair of the UV-lesions (Fig. 4A, B)⁶³. Recruitment was also observed in xpa-1 and xpf-1 null mutant animals, but in xpf-1 animals, this recruitment was more persistent after 30 min. Importantly, XPA-1 deficiency suppressed this persistent TFIIH recruitment in xpf-1 animals. These results are in line with our human experimental data and indicate that XPA-1 also promotes the stable binding of TFIIH to DNA damage in C. elegans, while its dissociation concurs with DNA damage excision.

**Fig. 4: XPA-dependent prolonged TFIIH-DNA damage binding impairs neuron functionality.**

Functionally intact chemosensory neurons in the head of C. elegans can take up the fluorescent dye DiI from the environment via ciliated dendrites⁶⁴, as clearly shown by fluorescently labeled neuron bodies, dendrites, and axons in unirradiated wild-type and NER deficient animals exposed to DiI (Fig. 4C). We have previously shown that this ‘dye filling’ neuronal phenotype requires active transcription maintained by TC-NER and is impaired upon transcription inhibition⁶³. Sensory neurons in xpf-1 and xpg-1 mutant animals completely lost their dye filling ability after UV irradiation, in a dose-dependent manner, indicative of transcription impairment and a loss of functional integrity of these neurons (Fig. 4C–E). This was also observed in xpa-1 animals, but to a lesser degree. Strikingly, loss of xpa-1 in xpf-1 or xpg-1 animals rescued their severe dye filling impairment to the same level as observed in xpa-1 single mutants (Fig. 4C–E).

We next measured developmental arrest in response to UV irradiation, as C. elegans larval development requires unperturbed transcription in functionally intact neurons^58,63. Larval survival after UV-induced DNA damage can, therefore, be used as a measure of neuronal and transcriptional integrity. In the ‘L1 larvae survival’ assay, which measures the capacity of first stage larvae to develop into adults⁶⁵, xpf-1 and xpg-1 animals displayed a dose-dependent developmental arrest upon UV irradiation, which was more pronounced than in xpa-1 animals (Fig. 4F, G). Again, we observed that XPA-1 deficiency partially but clearly suppressed the stronger UV-induced developmental arrest of xpf-1 and xpg-1 animals. Taken together, these results suggest that the degree of TFIIH stalling to DNA damage directly correlates with the severity of neuronal defects observed in vivo.

Prolonged TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage causes neuron dysfunction

To confirm that prolonged TFIIH binding to DNA damage, and not some other feature of XPF or XPG deficient cells, induces severe neuronal dysfunction, we tested the impact of GTF2H5/TTDA (in humans) or GTF-2H5 (in C. elegans) deficiency in the absence of DNA damage excision. GTF2H5/TTDA promotes the stability and DNA damage recruitment of TFIIH in human cells^66,67,68. Using immunofluorescence and UV irradiation through a microporous filter to inflict LUD, we observed that siRNA-mediated depletion of human GTF2H5/TTDA not only suppressed TFIIH recruitment to DNA damage in wild-type cells, but also in XPF KO U2OS cells (Supplementary Fig. 3A). In C. elegans, we found that GTF-2H5 also promotes the stability of the TFIIH complex⁶² and that its absence prevented stable TFIIH recruitment to DNA damage as well (Supplementary Fig. 3B). Intriguingly, we observed that GTF-2H5 deficiency suppressed both the dye filling defect and the strong developmental arrest of UV-irradiated xpf-1 animals (Supplementary Fig. 3C, D).

Subsequently, we generated a C. elegans mutant strain with nuclease deficient xpf-1, as in human cells we observed prolonged TFIIH binding to DNA damage with the impaired XPF nuclease mutant C236R. We changed aspartic acid at position 719 (D719) of the XPF-1 nuclease motif into alanine (Supplementary Fig. 3E), which in humans abolishes XPF catalytic activity⁶⁹ and leads to continuous TFIIH recruitment to DNA damage³⁷. As comparison, we also generated C. elegans with arginine at position 805 (R805) mutated into tryptophan (Supplementary Fig. 3F), which mimics human patient XPF mutation R799W that still retains catalytic activity⁴⁴ and leads to less pronounced TFIIH recruitment and stalling (Fig. 2G, I)³⁷. Dye filling experiments showed that nuclease dead xpf-1[D719A] mutants, but not xpf-1[R805W] mutants, display a profound neuronal defect after UV irradiation (Fig. 4H).

We then directly tested whether TFIIH itself is responsible for the strong neuronal defects in UV-irradiated xpf-1 animals. We depleted TFIIH in a mutant xpf-1 background by growing xpf-1 animals expressing AID-tagged GTF-2H1 and a TIR1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex in neurons in the presence of auxin (Supplementary Fig. 3G). TFIIH depletion for the entire duration of the dye filling assay did not rescue the dye filling defect in xpf-1 animals, in line with our previous observation that transcription is required for neuronal functionality⁶³. However, transient TFIIH depletion, i.e. for 24 h of the 72 h recovery time after DNA damage induction, partially rescued the xpf-1 dye filling defect (Fig. 4I, J). Together, these results indicate that prolonged binding of TFIIH to non-excised DNA damage is, in part, responsible for impairment of neuronal functionality in vivo.

TFIIH stalling in transcribed DNA impairs neuron function

In C. elegans neurons, NER is particularly active to maintain the integrity of transcribed genes rather than that of the entire genome⁶³, which implies that the TFIIH stalling and neuronal defects in UV-irradiated xpf-1 animals are predominantly due to TC-NER activity. Indeed, the loss of CSB-1 (TC-NER initiation), but not of XPC-1 (GG-NER initiation), partially rescued the dye filling defect of UV-irradiated xpf-1 animals (Fig. 5A, B). However, counterintuitively, csb-1 animals did not show any dye filling defect by themselves. We have previously shown that in the absence of CSB-1, XPC-1-mediated NER will remove part of the DNA damage in active genes of C. elegans postmitotic cells^58,63. We confirmed this by measuring the ‘recovery of protein synthesis’ after DNA damage induction, which reflects DNA damage repair in a transcribed GFP gene in C. elegans muscle cells⁷⁰. In this assay, AID-tagged GFP expressed in muscle cells is depleted by growing animals in the presence of auxin. Animals are then irradiated to induce DNA damage and after 48 h the ability to transcribe GFP is determined by measuring GFP fluorescence levels. As GFP can only be expressed if the DNA damage in genes is repaired, this assay is an indirect method to monitor DNA repair activity in transcribed genes. This assay indeed showed that repair normally takes place via CSB-1, and thus TC-NER, but that XPC-1 acts partially redundant to CSB-1 (Supplementary Fig. 3H). This suggests that in CSB-1 deficient animals, sufficient residual DNA repair can take place during the course of the dye filling experiment (72 h) to prevent neuronal defects. Also, this implies that, in CSB-1 deficient animals, some TFIIH molecules still bind to DNA damage because of XPC-1 activity. We, therefore, tested if simultaneous loss of CSB-1 and XPC-1 rescued dye filling in xpf-1 animals, but found that this by itself already caused a strong dye filling defect irrespective of whether animals were proficient or deficient in XPF-1 (Fig. 5C). Therefore, to further confirm that TC-NER activity induces the strong neuronal defects in UV-irradiated xpf-1 animals, we exposed animals to the TC-NER-specific DNA damaging agent illudin-S, which creates DNA damage that is not recognized by XPC⁷¹. Similar to UV irradiation, xpf-1 animals exposed to illudin-S displayed a strong developmental arrest and dye filling defect, and these phenotypes were partially rescued by XPA-1 or GTF-2H5 deficiency, respectively (Fig. 5D, E). These results demonstrate that prolonged TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage, mediated by NER in actively transcribed DNA, is in part responsible for neuronal functional impairment in the absence of efficient DNA damage excision. Moreover, the lack of dye filling upon loss of both CSB-1 and XPC-1 suggests that similar neuronal defects occur if DNA damage detection and initiation of NER do not take place in active genes.

**Fig. 5: Prolonged TFIIH-DNA damage binding due to TC-NER activity impairs neuron functionality.**

Discussion

In this study, we show that the binding of TFIIH to DNA damage differs between cells that lack XPA or TTDA and cells that lack ERCC1-XPF or XPG, even though all these cells are defective in the NER pathway. The absence of ERCC1-XPF- or XPG-mediated DNA incision delays TFIIH dissociation, resulting in its stalling at the lesion site. Contrarily, XPA and TTDA loss prevents stable, and thus prolonged, TFIIH binding to DNA damage. These results imply that XPA and TTDA are both necessary for the formation of a stable NER incision complex that normally disassembles upon DNA damage excision. Furthermore, we show that the degree of TFIIH stalling is associated with the severity of XPF-deficiency disease and that TFIIH stalling negatively impacts cell function. We therefore propose that persistent binding of TFIIH to DNA damage could be a causative factor contributing to a more severe pathology observed in some ERCC1-XPF and XPG deficient patients (Fig. 5F).

After DNA damage recognition, TFIIH is recruited to DNA damage in GG-NER by XPC and in TC-NER by UVSSA^{7,8,9,10,11,72}. In vitro NER reconstitution assays, together with immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence studies, have clearly indicated that XPA and RPA are subsequently recruited in a manner dependent on TFIIH function, and aid in the recruitment of additional factors while stabilizing the incision complex^{20,68,73,74,75,76}. However, our TFIIH mobility data in living cells show reduced TFIIH association with and accelerated TFIIH dissociation from damaged chromatin in XPA deficient cells. Thus, it is likely that XPA, in addition to its dependence on TFIIH, reciprocally promotes the stable binding of TFIIH to DNA damage. This is consistent with our previous FRAP studies showing that even the DNA association of XPC, and thus the formation of a stable DNA-bound ternary XPC-TFIIH-XPA damage verification complex, is stimulated by the presence of XPA¹². Also, this is in line with the interdependent recruitment of TFIIH and XPA to lesion-stalled Pol II that has been observed in an in vitro TC-NER system⁷⁷. Moreover, the similar phenotypes that we observe after the loss of TTDA and XPA fit well with this notion, as TTDA not only stabilizes TFIIH^62,66,78,79 but is also specifically required for XPA recruitment⁶⁸. Structural, architectural modeling and biochemical studies hint at a mechanism by which XPA stabilizes TFIIH association with DNA damage. Firstly, XPA itself interacts with DNA and TFIIH and thus anchors TFIIH to DNA damage⁸⁰. Secondly, in doing so, XPA bridges the XPB and XPD subunits and thereby catalyzes the removal of the CAK subcomplex from TFIIH, thus stabilizing a DNA-bound TFIIH conformation that allows the XPD helicase to scan for lesions in a 5’ to 3’ direction^19,20,81. Indeed, XPA stimulates XPD helicase and XPB translocase activities in vitro^14,15,19,82. Besides XPA, XPG also stimulates the XPD helicase activity in vitro, possibly by promoting the stable binding of XPD to ssDNA and the unwinding of dsDNA at the ss/dsDNA junction^19,83. This could imply that XPG joins TFIIH before the full completion of DNA unwinding, suggesting that the stalling of TFIIH in XPG deficient cells is at an incomplete NER bubble intermediate.

We previously reported that severe XPCS mutations in XPF and XPG cause persistent targeting of core NER factors to DNA damage³⁷. Here, we extend these findings by showing that TFIIH is not only repeatedly targeted – due to lack of repair – but also resides longer at each lesion in the absence of DNA incision. Intriguingly, we found that the degree of TFIIH binding is correlated with the severity of disease caused by XPF mutations. In particular, the XPF C236R mutation, causing severe XPCS complex⁴², led to the strongest increase in TFIIH binding, which was similar to that observed upon XPF knockout. This likely relates to the fact that this mutation strongly reduces the nucleolytic activity of human XPF and almost completely abrogates XPF-mediated DNA repair activity, as measured in Xenopus egg extracts and human cells^37,42,84. In line with this, we previously observed that C236R led to similar continuous DNA damage recruitment of TFIIH as a nuclease dead D715A mutation in XPF³⁷. Here, we show that inactivating the nuclease activity of XPF-1 also leads to profound neuronal impairment after UV irradiation in C. elegans. In contrast, XPF with P379S or R799W mutations, which both cause XP, still displays considerable nucleolytic and DNA repair activity^37,44, and therefore does not lead to similarly strong TFIIH stalling as in the absence of DNA incision.

Our results indicate that longer TFIIH binding exacerbates DNA damage-induced transcription restart problems and responses consistent with cellular senescence in mammalian cells grown in culture, which can be partially suppressed by preventing stable TFIIH-DNA binding. In C. elegans this severely impairs the in vivo functional integrity of postmitotic, differentiated neurons upon DNA damage induction. Importantly, we have previously shown that NER is only active in transcribed DNA in these neurons and that inhibition of transcription, by depletion of XPB-1, similarly impairs neuronal functional integrity^38,58,63. Therefore, it is likely that the problematic TFIIH stalling is due to TC-NER activity and that defects arise due to transcriptional interference. This is substantiated by the strong neuronal impairment observed after exposure of xpf-1 animals to illudin S, which generates lesions specifically repaired by TC-NER but not recognized by GG-NER⁷¹. Thus, the continuous recruitment and prolonged binding of TFIIH to transcription-blocking lesions may deplete the TFIIH pool that is needed for transcription initiation and/or may lead to signaling that notifies the transcription machinery to halt transcription. Also, illegitimately stalled TFIIH could render lesions less accessible to other repair mechanisms and directly block transcription. Moreover, stalled TFIIH could, as previously observed in mouse and human XPD deficient XPCS cells, lead to extensive ssDNA formation and DNA breaks impeding transcription^85,86,87. Interestingly, our results show that the complete absence of repair in transcribed genes, i.e. by mutation of both csb-1 and xpc-1, leads to a dye filling defect as strong as loss of xpf-1 or xpg-1 in C. elegans. This suggests that stalling of, e.g., Pol II or the transcription machinery may impair neuronal integrity, as also previously proposed^5,88. It will be interesting to investigate in the future which transcriptional inhibitory mechanisms underlie these similar phenotypes.

Symptoms of human patients carrying pathogenic mutations in XPA, TTDA, ERCC1-XPF or XPG are very heterogeneous and their severity depends on the type of mutation, whether the protein is still present and recruited to damage, and on life circumstances and environmental factors^26,41. In spite of this heterogeneity, prominent differences exist between XPA or TTDA deficiency and ERCC1-XPF or XPG deficiency. Mutations that completely abrogate the XPA protein cause severe XP combined with progressive neurological decline^18,41. However, mutations that inactivate ERCC1-XPF catalytic function or abrogate the XPG protein cause different types of neurological deficiencies, progeria, and severe developmental failure, often resulting in early death, that resemble Cockayne syndrome^{23,37,42,50,89}. Such severe features are not observed in TTDA deficient patients⁶⁷, even though the complete absence of TTDA leads to embryonic lethality in mammals⁶⁶. These differences between XPA, ERCC1-XPF and XPG deficiency are further recapitulated in mouse models for NER disease, which show that knockout of XPA causes photosensitive features, whereas knockout of XPF or XPG leads to additional severe neurodevelopmental problems, progeria and early death^{49,50,51,52,53,90}. These differences can be partially attributed to the different activities of these proteins, as XPA appears to be active in NER only whereas ERCC1-XPF and XPG have important functions in other genome maintenance pathways as well. For instance, ERCC1-XPF plays an important role in the unhooking of DNA interstrand crosslinks as part of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway^91,92. Mutations in ERCC1-XPF that disrupt this function therefore lead to Fanconi anemia disease, which can include features of XP and CS pathology^42,93. XPG has been implicated in e.g. resolving R-loops (together with ERCC1-XPF) and replication stress^94,95,96,97, which will contribute to the heterogeneous phenotype observed in XPG patients²³. Nevertheless, our results strongly suggest that the higher degree of TFIIH stalling observed during NER, and thus the persistence of stable NER intermediates, is more toxic than the damage itself and, therefore, likely also contributes to the more severe symptoms generally observed in the absence of ERCC1-XPF or XPG (Fig. 5F). A similar hypothesis implicating stronger DNA-bound TFIIH and a long-lasting NER intermediate as causative for the more severe CS phenotype has been put forward based on analysis of Rad3/XPD mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae⁹⁸.

We show that the depletion of XPA-1 in C. elegans, preventing the stable association of TFIIH with DNA damage, alleviates the more severe phenotypes observed upon XPF-1 or XPG-1 deficiency. Intriguingly, XPA depletion in TC-NER deficient mouse models for (XP)CS with mutations in CSB, CSA or TFIIH, which exhibit relatively mild neurological features, severely worsens their phenotypes^{86,99,100,101,102,103}. This was attributed to enhanced levels of endogenous DNA damage due to XPA loss and potential other DNA repair functions of CSB, CSA or TFIIH outside TC-NER. Because these findings may appear inconsistent with our results, it is important to emphasize that these mouse models cannot be directly compared to our C. elegans models. In C. elegans, we employed UV irradiation to increase DNA damage levels, as the animals live too short to accumulate sufficient endogenous DNA damage levels to manifest a clear phenotype⁶⁰. In these conditions, xpa-1 deficiency causes clear neurological and developmental phenotypes, as are also observed in humans with hereditary XPA deficiency^18,41, whereas XPA deficiency in mice does not cause any obvious neurological or developmental features^52,53. Importantly, the TC-NER deficient mouse models in which XPA loss worsens the phenotype are deficient in CSB or CSA, which act upstream of TFIIH, or in TFIIH itself, and persistent TFIIH binding will therefore likely not be an issue in these animals. In contrast, we used C. elegans models deficient in XPF-1 or XPG-1, which both act downstream of TFIIH, and in which persistent TFIIH binding occurs. Nevertheless, it will be worth investigating in XPCS mouse models with full XPF or XPG deficiency, which display very severe neurological and growth defects⁹⁰, whether preventing the prolonged binding of TFIIH to DNA damage mitigates any of the severe features. Such experiments are necessary to explore whether it may be possible to alleviate some of the more severe symptoms of ERCC1-XPF or XPG deficiency in human patients as well, possibly by therapeutically targeting XPA or TTDA. To do this, it is necessary to determine how these NER proteins can be safely targeted and which of the heterogeneous symptoms in XPCS patients are specifically caused by TFIIH stalling.

Methods

Cell lines, culture conditions and treatments

All human U2OS osteosarcoma and MRC-5 fibroblasts generated and used are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂ in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM (Lonza) and Ham’s F10 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (PS). All cell lines were regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination. XPA was knocked out by transient transfection of cells with pLentiCRISPR-V2¹⁰⁴ containing an sgRNA targeting near the START codon of the XPA locus (GGCGGCTTTAGAGCAACCCG). Transfected cells were selected with puromycin and correct XPA KO clones were isolated and verified by sequencing and immunoblot. To generate GFP-XPB KI U2OS cells, cells were transiently transfected with pLentiCRISPR-v2¹⁰⁴ carrying an sgRNA targeting near the START codon of the XPB/ERCC3 locus (TCTGCTGCTGTAGCTGCCAT), and pCRBluntIITOPO carrying GFP cDNA flanked by XPB homology sequences. After selection with puromycin and FACS, a clonal cell line was isolated and verified by sequencing and immunoblot. CSB-mClover KI U2OS cells are described in Llerena Schiffmacher et al. ⁴⁶. To generate GFP-XPB KI cells expressing wild-type or P379S, R799W or C236R mutant XPF-mCherry, GFP was first knocked-in at the XPB/ERCC3 locus in XPF KO U2OS cells³⁷, after which cells were lentivirally transduced with wild-type or mutant XPF-mCherry. Stable expressing cell lines were selected with either puromycin (XPF-P379S-mCherry) or blasticidin (XPF-wt-, -R799W-, -C236R-mCherry). To generate WT and XPG KO cells stably expressing BFP-Lamin B1, mScarlet-Lamin A and NLS-GFP driven by an IL6 promoter, cells were transfected with hyperactive piggyBac transposase¹⁰⁵ and the reporter construct containing these sequences. The reporter construct components were derived from Dronpa-LaminB1-10, mCherry-LaminA-C-18, pHRM-NLS-dCas9-GFP11x7-NLS-P2A-BFP-dWPRE and pmScarlet-i_C1. Piggybac-EGFP was a gift from Alex N. Zelensky¹⁰⁶ and was used as the initial cloning template. Dronpa-LaminB1-10 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 57282); mCherry-LaminA-C-18 was a gift from Michael Davidson (Addgene plasmid # 55068); pHRM-NLS-dCas9-GFP11x7-NLS-P2A-BFP-dWPRE was a gift from Bo Huang (Addgene plasmid # 70224)¹⁰⁷ and pmScarlet-i_C1 was a gift from Dorus Gadella (Addgene plasmid # 85044)¹⁰⁸. The plasmid with mCherry expressed under a human IL6-promotor was obtained from Tebu-bio. Cloning details are available upon request. Stable expressing cells were selected by FACS. Plasmid transfections were performed using JetPei (Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

siRNA treatments

siRNA transfections were performed 48 h before each experiment using RNAiMax (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and siRNA efficiency was validated by immunoblotting (Supplementary Fig. 1B). siRNA oligomers were purchased from Thermo Scientific Dharmacon: siCTRL 5’-UGGUUUACAUGUCGACUAA-3’ (D-001210-05-20), siXPA 5’ CUGAUGAUAAACACAAGCUUA-3’ (MJAWM-000011), siXPF 5’-AAGACGAGCUCACGAGUAU-3’ (D-019946-04), siXPG (M-006626-00), and siTTDA 5’-CGUCUUUGUAAUAGCAGAAUU-3’ (custom siRNA).

Colony forming assays

For colony survivals, cells were seeded in triplicate in 6-well plates (400 cells/well) and treated with increasing doses of UV-C one day after seeding. After seven days, colonies were fixed and stained. Fixing and staining solution: 0.1% w/v Coomassie Blue (Bio-Rad) was dispersed in a 50% Methanol, 10% Acetic Acid solution. Colonies were counted with the integrated colony counter GelCount (Oxford Optronix).

UV-C irradiation

Human cells were grown on coverslips and washed with PBS prior to UV-C irradiation with a germicidal lamp (254 nm; TUV lamp, Phillips) at the indicated doses. Local UV damage (LUD) was induced applying 60 J/m² UV-C through an 8 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore) for immunofluorescence or 80 J/m² UV-C through a 5 μm polycarbonate filter (Millipore) for iFRAP.

Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)

For FRAP, cells were seeded on coverslips and imaged with a Leica TCS SP5 or SP8 microscope using a 40x/1.25 NA HCX PL APO CS oil immersion lens (Leica Microsystems) at 37 °C and 5% CO₂. FRAP was performed as described^46,109,110. Briefly, the nuclear fluorescent signal of the GFP-tagged protein was measured in a strip across the nucleus (512×16 pixels) at 1400 Hz of a 488 nm laser until a steady state level was reached (pre-bleach). The fluorescent signal in the strip was bleached with 100% 488 nm laser power and fluorescence recovery was measured until complete recovery. Fluorescence signals were normalized to the average pre-bleach fluorescence after background signal subtraction. The immobile fractions (F_imm) were determined using the fluorescence intensity measured immediately after UV (I₀) and the average steady-state fluorescent signal after complete recovery, from untreated (I_{final, unt}) and UV-treated cells (I_{final, UV}), and applying the formula:

$${{{{{\rm{F}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{imm}}}}}}=1-\frac{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{final}}}}}},{{{{{\rm{UV}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}0,{{{{{\rm{UV}}}}}}}{{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{final}}}}}},{{{{{\rm{unt}}}}}}-{{{{{\rm{I}}}}}}0,{{{{{\rm{UV}}}}}}}$$

(1)

Inverse fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (iFRAP)

For iFRAP, cells were seeded on coverslips and imaged on a Leica SP8 microscope using a 40/1.25 NA HCX PL APO CS oil immersion lens (Leica Microsystems) at 37 °C and 5% CO_2. The entire nucleus was bleached with 20% 488 nm laser power except for two non-bleached areas where fluorescence signal was monitored over time: LUD and a non-damaged nuclear area. Background signal was measured in the cytoplasm. iFRAP curves were obtained after background correction and normalization of the damaged area to the fluorescence levels of the pre-damage conditions. The non-damaged area served as internal control and was not plotted. To obtain the half-time of protein residence in the LUD the non-linear regression fitted to one-phase exponential decay analysis was applied to the iFRAP curves, using Graph Pad Prism version 9 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).

Cell fractionation

U2OS cells were grown to confluency on 10 cm dishes, UV-C irradiated with the indicated dose and lysed in lysis buffer (30 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 1 mM MgCl₂, 130 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM DTT and EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)), at 4 °C for 30 min. Non-chromatin bound proteins were recovered by centrifugation (10 min, 4 °C, 16100 g). Chromatin-containing pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer supplemented with 250 U/µL of Benzonase (Merck Millipore) and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. Equal amounts of sample were used for SDS-PAGE gels and immunoblotting analysis.

Immunoblotting

Total cell extracts were prepared by washing cells twice with PBS and harvesting in 1:1 mixture PBS and 2x Concentrate Laemmli buffer (Merck Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1:1000 benzonase (Millipore) and boiled for 5 min at 98 °C. Protein lysates were separated in SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto PVDF membranes (0.45 µm, Merck Millipore). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% BSA in PBS and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) for 1-2 h at room temperature, or at 4 °C overnight. Membranes were visualized and analyzed with the Odyssey CLx Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences).

Cell fixation and immunofluorescence

To image fluorescence, cells grown on coverslips were fixed for 15 min in 2% paraformaldehyde, incubated with DAPI for 5 min and mounted using Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc.). For immunofluorescence, cells grown on coverslips were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized for 15 min in 0.1% Triton in PBS. To visualize LUD with CPD antibody, DNA was denatured for 5 min in 70 mM NaOH. Blocking was performed for 1 h in 3% BSA and 2.25% glycine in 0.05% Tween-PBS, followed by 2 h incubation at room temperature with primary antibodies and 1 h incubation with secondary antibodies (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) and DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). Coverslips were mounted on slides using Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc.). To acquire images an LSM700 microscope equipped with 40x Plan-apochromat 1.3 NA oil immersion lens (Carl Zeiss Micro Imaging Inc.).

Recovery of RNA synthesis

To measure recovery of RNA synthesis, cells were grown on coverslips and mock treated or irradiated with 2 J/m² UV-C (254 nm lamp, Philips). 24 h after irradiation, RNA was labeled by incubation with EU for 1 h. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were incubated in Click-it buffer containing Atto 594 Azide (60 µM, Atto Tec.), Tris-HCl (50 mM, pH 7.6), CuSO4.5H2O (4 mM, Sigma) and ascorbic acid (10 mM, Sigma) for 1 h to visualize EU incorporation. DAPI (Sigma) was used to stain DNA and coverslips were mounted using Aqua- Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc.). Images were acquired on an LSM700 confocal microscope and transcription levels were quantified with FIJI image analysis software.

Unscheduled DNA synthesis

To measure NER capacity by Unscheduled DNA synthesis⁴⁵, U2OS cells grown on coverslips were incubated with medium containing 0.5% FCS and 1 µM Palbociclib (Selleck Chemicals) for 24 h, to limit S phase cells. Subsequently, cells were treated with 16 J/m² UV irradiation and incubated for 1 h in medium containing 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU, Invitrogen). Cells were fixed in 3.6% formaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min and incubated with 1.5% BSA in PBS for 10 min. EdU incorporation was visualized by incubating cells for 1 h at room temperature with Click-it reaction cocktail containing Atto 594 Azide (60 μM, Atto Tec.), Tris-HCl (50 mM, pH 7.6), CuSO₄*5H₂O (4 mM, Sigma) and ascorbic acid (10 mM, Sigma). After washes in 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, DNA was stained with DAPI (Sigma), and slides were mounted using Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences, Inc.). Images were acquired using an LSM700 confocal microscope and fluorescence signals were quantified using FIJI image analysis software. Background fluorescence was subtracted and intensity levels were averaged and normalized to the fluorescence levels in control conditions.

Senescence reporter assay

To evaluate the induction of senescence features, on day 1 BFP-Lamin B1/mScarlet-Lamin A/GFP-IL6 transgenic U2OS and XPG KO cells were seeded. To deplete XPA, cells were transfected with siXPA on day 2. To evaluate DNA damage-induced senescence, cells were exposed to 1 µM doxorubicin (Sigma) for 2 h on day 2. Cells from all conditions were fixed on day 4 and imaged using a Leica SP8 confocal microscope equipped with a HC PL APO 40X/1.30 OIL CS2 objective. For the analysis of confocal images, we developed an image analysis pipeline in Fiji software¹¹¹. The images were split into separate channels, one channel for each color. Images of the lamin A-intensity were segmented to obtain regions of interest (ROIs). For each obtained ROI, the mean intensities of transgenic lamin A, B1 and GFP were determined and exported to excel files. GFP-positive and negative cells were identified and plotted with their corresponding lamin intensities using Graphpad Prism v5.01 (Graphpad software Inc.).

C. elegans strains, culture and imaging

C. elegans was cultured according to standard methods on nematode growth media (NGM) agar plates seeded with Escherichia coli OP50. C. elegans strains used are listed in Supplementary Table 4. C. elegans xpf-1 point mutants D719A and R805W were generated using gRNAs with targeting sequence TTCCTTTCAATTGCAATGTT (D719A) or ATCCCAAAATGAGATGTGTT (R805W) and as homology directed repair template ssDNA oligomers with sequence GGTAGACATTTTTTAATTATTTTTTTATAACAATTACCGAAGAAGTCTCAGATCGGTGCTTACATTCTCTCGCCGAATATCGCCATCGAGAGGAAAGCGTTGGACGATTTGACACAGTCTTTG (D719A) or AACTCTGCGGAATTTGTCGGAGAAATCGTCCACACACACCACATCTTCGGATTTGCCCAAATTAAAGAGCAAAAAATTGA (R805W). sgRNA and oligomer were injected together with Cas9 (Integrated DNA technologies) in xpf-1(emc57[xpf::GFP]) animals⁶³. Mutations were verified by genotyping PCR and sequencing. All mutants were backcrossed against wild-type strain, which was Bristol N2. All assays were performed at 20 °C.

C. elegans imaging and recovery of protein synthesis

For imaging of DNA damage recruitment (Fig. 4A), living C. elegans were mounted on 2% agar pads in M9 buffer containing 10 mM NaN₃ (Sigma) and imaged on a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. For quantification of DNA damage recruitment (Fig. 4B), animals were fixed at the indicated time points in 3.6% formaldehyde in M9 buffer and recruitment was determined by measuring the fluorescence signal in bivalents in oocytes, normalized for background fluorescence, on a Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope. For recovery of protein synthesis (RPS)⁷⁰, AID::GFP was depleted by culturing young adult animals in the presence of 100 µM auxin (3-indoleacetic acid; Sigma) for 2 h. Animals were mock-treated or irradiated with 120 J/m² UV-B (Philips TL-12 tubes, 40 W) and allowed to recover for 48 h on culture plates. AID::GFP fluorescence was imaged in body wall muscle cells in the heads of living animals on a Leica TCS SP8 microscope (LAS AF software, Leica) and in Fiji ImageJ.

L1 larvae survival assay

L1 larvae UV survival assays were performed as described⁶⁵. Briefly, eggs collected from adult C. elegans after hypochlorite treatment were plated onto five technical replicate agar plates per UV dose seeded with HT115 bacteria. After 16 h, L1 larvae were irradiated with the indicated dose of UV-B (Philips TL-12 tubes, 40 W) and allowed to recover for 48 h. For illudin S survival, eggs collected from hypochlorite treatment were hatched in 96-well plates containing per well 100 µL of S Basal medium (supplemented with HT115 bacteria, 1 M potassium citrate (pH 6), trace metals solution, 1 M CaCl₂ and 1 M MgSO₄), while gently shaking at room temperature. After 16 h, the indicated concentrations of illudin S (Toku-e) were added to the liquid cultures for 24 h after which animals were allowed to recover on culture plates containing HT115 bacteria for 72 h at 15 °C. Animals arrested at the L1/L2 stages and surviving animals that developed beyond the L2 stage were counted to determine the survival percentage.

Dye filling assays

Dye filling experiments were performed as described⁶³. Synchronized adult C. elegans were irradiated with the indicated dose of UV-B (Philips TL-12 tubes, 40 W) or incubated with the indicated dose of illudin S (Toku-e) for 24 h in 100 µL of S Basal medium (supplemented with HT115 bacteria, 1 M potassium citrate (pH 6), trace metals solution, 1 M CaCl₂ and 1 M MgSO₄) and allowed to recover on culture plates for 72 h. To deplete AID-tagged GTF2H1, animals were grown in the presence of 1 mM auxin (3-indoleacetic acid, Sigma) for 24 or 72 h, as indicated. Animals were then washed and incubated in 10 μg/ml DiI (Molecular probes) dissolved in M9 buffer for 30 min. Next, animals were allowed to recover for 1 h on culture plates after which dye filling was scored using an Olympus SZX12 Stereo Microscope equipped with a U-RFL-T mercury lamp or imaged using a Zeiss LSM700 confocal microscope.

Statistical analysis

Mean values and S.E.M. error bars are shown for each experiment. For the statistical significance analysis of immobile fractions, we applied a One-Way ANOVA with correction for multiple comparisons. For iFRAP assays a Non-linear regression analysis was performed. All analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism version 9 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Any other data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Schärer, O. D. Nucleotide excision repair in Eukaryotes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012609 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marteijn, J. A., Lans, H., Vermeulen, W. & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. Understanding nucleotide excision repair and its roles in cancer and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 465–481 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mu, H., Geacintov, N. E., Broyde, S., Yeo, J. E. & Schärer, O. D. Molecular basis for damage recognition and verification by XPC-RAD23B and TFIIH in nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair 71, 33–42 (2018). vol.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sugasawa, K. Molecular mechanisms of DNA damage recognition for mammalian nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 44, 110–117 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lans, H., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., Vermeulen, W. & Marteijn, J. A. The DNA damage response to transcription stress. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 766–784 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jia, N. et al. Dealing with transcription-blocking DNA damage: Repair mechanisms, RNA polymerase II processing and human disorders. DNA Repair (Amst.) 106, 103192 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Theil, A. F., Häckes, D. & Lans, H. TFIIH central activity in nucleotide excision repair to prevent disease. DNA Repair (Amst.) 132, 103568 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bernardes de Jesus, B. M., Bjørås, M., Coin, F. & Egly, J. M. Dissection of the Molecular Defects Caused by Pathogenic Mutations in the DNA Repair Factor XPC. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 7225–7235 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Okuda, M., Nakazawa, Y., Guo, C., Ogi, T. & Nishimura, Y. Common TFIIH recruitment mechanism in global genome and transcription-coupled repair subpathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 13043–13055 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oksenych, V., De Jesus, B. B., Zhovmer, A., Egly, J. M. & Coin, F. Molecular insights into the recruitment of TFIIH to sites of DNA damage. EMBO J. 28, 2971–2980 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van der Weegen, Y. et al. The cooperative action of CSB, CSA, and UVSSA target TFIIH to DNA damage-stalled RNA polymerase II. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–16 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Silva, C. et al. Ubiquitin and TFIIH-stimulated DDB2 dissociation drives DNA damage handover in nucleotide excision repair. Nat. Commun. 11, 4868 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Coin, F., Oksenych, V. & Egly, J. M. Distinct Roles for the XPB/p52 and XPD/p44 Subcomplexes of TFIIH in Damaged DNA Opening during Nucleotide Excision Repair. Mol. Cell 26, 245–256 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugasawa, K., Akagi, Jichi, Nishi, R., Iwai, S. & Hanaoka, F. Two-step recognition of DNA damage for mammalian nucleotide excision repair: directional binding of the XPC complex and DNA strand scanning. Mol. Cell 36, 642–653 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, C. L. et al. Tripartite DNA lesion recognition and verification by XPC, TFIIH, and XPA in nucleotide excision repair. Mol. Cell 59, 1025–1034 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
De Laat, W. L. et al. DNA-binding polarity of human replication protein A positions nucleases in nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev. 12, 2598–2609 (1998).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsunaga, T., Park, C. H., Bessho, T., Mu, D. & Sancar, A. Replication protein A confers structure-specific endonuclease activities to the XPF-ERCC1 and XPG subunits of human DNA repair excision nuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11047–11050 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugitani, N., Sivley, R. M., Perry, K. E., Capra, J. A. & Chazin, W. J. XPA: A key scaffold for human nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair 44, 123–135 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kokic, G. et al. Structural basis of TFIIH activation for nucleotide excision repair. Nat. Commun. 10, 2885 (2019).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Coin, F. et al. Nucleotide Excision Repair Driven by the Dissociation of CAK from TFIIH. Mol. Cell 31, 9–20 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Staresincic, L. et al. Coordination of dual incision and repair synthesis in human nucleotide excision repair. EMBO J. 28, 1111–1120 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fagbemi, A. F., Orelli, B. & Schärer, O. D. Regulation of endonuclease activity in human nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst.) 10, 722–729 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Muniesa-Vargas, A. et al. XPG: a multitasking genome caretaker. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 1–20 (2022).
Article Google Scholar
van Toorn, M. et al. Active DNA damage eviction by HLTF stimulates nucleotide excision repair. Mol. Cell 82, 1343–1358.e8 (2022).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ogi, T. et al. Three DNA polymerases, recruited by different mechanisms, carry out NER repair synthesis in human cells. Mol. Cell 37, 714–727 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ferri, D., Orioli, D. & Botta, E. Heterogeneity and overlaps in nucleotide excision repair disorders. Clin. Genet. 97, 12–24 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lehmann, A. R., McGibbon, D. & Stefanini, M. Xeroderma pigmentosum. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 6, 70 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Natale, V. A comprehensive description of the severity groups in Cockayne syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 155A, 1081–1095 (2011).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Natale, V. & Raquer, H. Xeroderma pigmentosum-Cockayne syndrome complex. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 12, 65 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kraemer, K. H. et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy and Cockayne syndrome: A complex genotype-phenotype relationship. Neuroscience 145, 1388–1396 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Theil, A. F., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. & Vermeulen, W. TTDA: big impact of a small protein. Exp. Cell Res. 329, 61–68 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stefanini, M., Botta, E., Lanzafame, M. & Orioli, D. Trichothiodystrophy: From basic mechanisms to clinical implications. DNA Repair 9, 2–10 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rahbar, Z. & Naraghi, M. De Sanctis-Cacchione syndrome: A case report and literature review. Int. J. Women’s Dermatol. 1, 136–139 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
Karikkineth, A. C., Scheibye-Knudsen, M., Fivenson, E., Croteau, D. L. & Bohr, V. A. Cockayne syndrome: Clinical features, model systems and pathways. Ageing Res. Rev. 33, 3–17 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Dysregulation of gene expression as a cause of cockayne syndrome neurological disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 111, 14454–14459 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Vélez-Cruz, R. & Egly, J. M. Cockayne syndrome group B (CSB) protein: At the crossroads of transcriptional networks. Mech. Ageing Dev. 134, 234–242 (2013).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Sabatella, M. et al. Repair protein persistence at DNA lesions characterizes XPF defect with Cockayne syndrome features. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 9563–9577 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lans, H. & Vermeulen, W. Tissue specific response to DNA damage: C. elegans as role model. DNA Repair (Amst.) 32, 141–148 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoogstraten, D. et al. Rapid switching of TFIIH between RNA polymerase I and II transcription and DNA repair in vivo. Mol. Cell 10, 1163–1174 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vermeulen, W. Dynamics of mammalian NER proteins. DNA Repair (Amst.) 10, 760–771 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fassihi, H. et al. Deep phenotyping of 89 xeroderma pigmentosum patients reveals unexpected heterogeneity dependent on the precise molecular defect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 113, E1236–E1245 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kashiyama, K. et al. Malfunction of nuclease ERCC1-XPF results in diverse clinical manifestations and causes Cockayne syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, and Fanconi anemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92, 807–819 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sijbers, A. M. et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum group F caused by a defect in a structure-specific DNA repair endonuclease. Cell 86, 811–822 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ahmad, A. et al. Mislocalization of XPF-ERCC1 nuclease contributes to reduced DNA repair in XP-F patients. PLoS Genet 6, e1000871 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jia, N. et al. A rapid, comprehensive system for assaying DNA repair activity and cytotoxic effects of DNA-damaging reagents. Nat. Protoc. 10, 12–24 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Llerena Schiffmacher, D. A. et al. Live cell transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair dynamics revisited. DNA Repair (Amst.) 130, 103566 (2023).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Geijer, M. E. et al. Elongation factor ELOF1 drives transcription-coupled repair and prevents genome instability. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 608–619 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, D. E. et al. Deficiency in the DNA repair protein ERCC1 triggers a link between senescence and apoptosis in human fibroblasts and mouse skin. Aging Cell 19, e13072 (2020).
Article MathSciNet CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Harada, Y.-N. et al. Postnatal Growth Failure, Short Life Span, and Early Onset of Cellular Senescence and Subsequent Immortalization in Mice Lacking the Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group G Gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2366 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Niedernhofer, L. J. et al. A new progeroid syndrome reveals that genotoxic stress suppresses the somatotroph axis. Nature 444, 1038–1043 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Weeda, G. et al. Disruption of mouse ERCC1 results in a novel repair syndrome with growth failure, nuclear abnormalities and senescence. Curr. Biol. 7, 427–439 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vries, A. et al. Increased susceptibility to ultraviolet-B and carcinogens of mice lacking the DNA excision repair gene XPA. Nature 377, 169–173 (1995).
Article PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Nakane, H. et al. High incidence of ultraviolet-B-or chemical-carcinogen-induced skin tumours in mice lacking the xeroderma pigmentosum group A gene. Nature 377, 165–168 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed ADS Google Scholar
Freund, A., Laberge, R. M., Demaria, M. & Campisi, J. Lamin B1 loss is a senescence-associated biomarker. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 2066 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Coppé, J. P., Desprez, P. Y., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: The dark side of tumor suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol.: Mech. Dis. 5, 99–118 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Ewald, J. A., Desotelle, J. A., Wilding, G. & Jarrard, D. F. Therapy-induced senescence in cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 1536–1546 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lans, H. & Vermeulen, W. Nucleotide excision repair in caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Biol. Int. 2011, 1–12 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
Lans, H. et al. Involvement of global genome repair, transcription coupled repair, and chromatin remodeling in UV DNA damage response changes during developm. PLoS Genet 6, 41 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
Astin, J. W., O’Neil, N. J. & Kuwabara, P. E. Nucleotide excision repair and the degradation of RNA pol II by the Caenorhabditis elegans XPA and Rsp5 orthologues, RAD-3 and WWP-1. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 267–280 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lans, H. et al. DNA damage leads to progressive replicative decline but extends the life span of long-lived mutant animals. Cell Death Differ. 20, 1709–1718 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Ward, J. D., Cheng, Z. & Dernburg, A. F. The auxin-inducible degradation (AID) system enables versatile conditional protein depletion in C. elegans. Dev 142, 4374–4384 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
Thijssen, K. L. et al. C. elegans TFIIH subunit GTF-2H5/TTDA is a non-essential transcription factor indispensable for DNA repair. Commun. Biol. 4, 1336 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabatella, M., Thijssen, K. L., Davó-Martínez, C., Vermeulen, W. & Lans, H. Tissue-specific DNA repair activity of ERCC-1/XPF-1. Cell Rep. 34, 108608 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hedgecock, E. M., Culotti, J. G., Thomson, J. N. & Perkins, L. A. Axonal guidance mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans identified by filling sensory neurons with fluorescein dyes. Dev. Biol. 111, 158–170 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
van der Woude, M. & Lans, H. C. elegans survival assays to discern global and transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. STAR Protoc. 2, 100586 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Theil, A. F. et al. Disruption of TTDA results in complete nucleotide excision repair deficiency and embryonic lethality. PLoS Genet 9, e1003431 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Giglia-Mari, G. et al. A new, tenth subunit of TFIIH is responsible for the DNA repair syndrome trichothiodystrophy group A. Nat. Genet. 36, 714–719 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Coin, F. et al. p8/TTD-A as a repair-specific TFIIH subunit. Mol. Cell 21, 215–226 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Enzlin, J. H. & Schärer, O. D. The active site of the DNA repair endonuclease XPF–ERCC1 forms a highly conserved nuclease motif. EMBO J. 21, 2045–2053 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van der Woude, M., Davó-Martínez, C., Thijssen, K. L., Vermeulen, W. & Lans, H. Recovery of protein synthesis to assay DNA repair activity in transcribed genes in living cells and tissues. Nucleic Acids Res 1, 13–14 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jaspers, N. G. J. et al. Anti-tumour compounds illudin S and Irofulven induce DNA lesions ignored by global repair and exclusively processed by transcription- and replication-coupled repair pathways. DNA Repair (Amst.) 1, 1027–1038 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yokoi, M. et al. The xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex XPC-HR23B plays an important role in the recruitment of transcription factor IIH to damaged DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9870–9875 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Volker, M. et al. Sequential assembly of the nucleotide excision repair factors in vivo. Mol. Cell 8, 213–224 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ziani, S. et al. Sequential and ordered assembly of a large DNA repair complex on undamaged chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 206, 589–598 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Riedl, T., Hanaoka, F. & Egly, J. M. The comings and goings of nucleotide excision repair factors on damaged DNA. EMBO J. 22, 5293–5303 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tapias, A. et al. Ordered conformational changes in damaged DNA induced by nucleotide excision repair factors. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 19074–19083 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lainé, J.-P. & Egly, J.-M. Initiation of DNA repair mediated by a stalled RNA polymerase IIO. EMBO J. 25, 387–397 (2006).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vermeulen, W. et al. Sublimiting concentration of TFIIH transcription/DNA repair factor causes TTD-A trichothiodystrophy disorder. Nat. Genet. 26, 307–313 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Botta, E. et al. Reduced level of the repair/transcription factor TFIIH in trichothiodystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 2919–2928 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim, J. et al. Lesion recognition by XPC, TFIIH and XPA in DNA excision repair. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05959-z (2023).
Kim, M. et al. Two interaction surfaces between XPA and RPA organize the preincision complex in nucleotide excision repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2207408119 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kappenberger, J. et al. How to limit the speed of a motor: the intricate regulation of the XPB ATPase and translocase in TFIIH. Nucleic Acids Res 48, 12282–12296 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bralić, A. et al. A scanning-to-incision switch in TFIIH-XPG induced by DNA damage licenses nucleotide excision repair. Nucleic Acids Res 51, 1019–1033 (2023).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Klein Douwel, D., Hoogenboom, W. S., Boonen, R. A. & Knipscheer, P. Recruitment and positioning determine the specific role of the XPF-ERCC1 endonuclease in interstrand crosslink repair. EMBO J. 36, 2034–2046 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Theron, T. et al. Transcription-associated breaks in xeroderma pigmentosum group D cells from patients with combined features of xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8368–8378 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Andressoo, J. O. et al. An Xpd mouse model for the combined xeroderma pigmentosum/Cockayne syndrome exhibiting both cancer predisposition and segmental progeria. Cancer Cell 10, 121–132 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Godon, C. et al. Generation of DNA single-strand displacement by compromised nucleotide excision repair. EMBO J. 31, 3550–3563 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakazawa, Y. et al. Mutations in UVSSA cause UV-sensitive syndrome and impair RNA polymerase IIo processing in transcription-coupled nucleotide-excision repair. Nat. Genet. 44, 586–592 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jaspers, N. G. J. et al. First reported patient with human ERCC1 deficiency has cerebro-oculo-facio- skeletal syndrome with a mild defect in nucleotide excision repair and severe developmental failure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 457–466 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Niedernhofer, L. J. Nucleotide excision repair deficient mouse models and neurological disease. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 1180–1189 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bhagwat, N. et al. XPF-ERCC1 participates in the fanconi anemia pathway of cross-link repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 6427–6437 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klein Douwel, D. et al. XPF-ERCC1 Acts in Unhooking DNA Interstrand Crosslinks in Cooperation with FANCD2 and FANCP/SLX4. Mol. Cell 54, 460–471 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bogliolo, M. et al. Mutations in ERCC4, encoding the DNA-repair endonuclease XPF, cause Fanconi anemia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92, 800–806 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Trego, K. S. et al. Non-catalytic Roles for XPG with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Homologous Recombination and Genome Stability. Mol. Cell 61, 535–546 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sollier, J. et al. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair factors promote R-loop-induced genome instability. Mol. Cell 56, 777–785 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Goulielmaki, E. et al. The splicing factor XAB2 interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG for R-loop processing. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–19 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Cristini, A. et al. Dual Processing of R-Loops and Topoisomerase I Induces Transcription-Dependent DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Cell Rep. 28, 3167–3181.e6 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moriel-Carretero, M., Herrera-Moyano, E. & Aguilera, A. A unified model for the molecular basis of Xeroderma pigmentosum -Cockayne Syndrome. Rare Dis. 3, e1079362 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Van Der Pluijm, I. et al. Impaired genome maintenance suppresses the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor 1 axis in mice with cockayne syndrome. PLoS Biol. 5, 0023–0038 (2007).
Google Scholar
Shiomi, N. et al. Severe growth retardation and short life span of double-mutant mice lacking Xpa and exon 15 of Xpg. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 351–357 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Murai, M. et al. Early postnatal ataxia and abnormal cerebellar development in mice lacking Xeroderma pigmentosum Group A and Cockayne syndrome Group B DNA repair genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 98, 13379 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Andressoo, J.-O. et al. An Xpb mouse model for combined xeroderma pigmentosum and cockayne syndrome reveals progeroid features upon further attenuation of DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 1276–1290 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brace, L. E. et al. Lifespan extension by dietary intervention in a mouse model of Cockayne syndrome uncouples early postnatal development from segmental progeria. Aging Cell 12, 1144–1147 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yusa, K., Zhou, L., Li, M. A., Bradley, A. & Craig, N. L. A hyperactive piggyBac transposase for mammalian applications. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 108, 1531–1536 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Zelensky, A. N., Schimmel, J., Kool, H., Kanaar, R. & Tijsterman, M. Inactivation of Pol θ and C-NHEJ eliminates off-target integration of exogenous DNA. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–7 (2017).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kamiyama, D. et al. Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat. Commun. 7, 11046 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Bindels, D. S. et al. MScarlet: A bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 53–56 (2016).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Houtsmuller, A. B. & Vermeulen, W. Macromolecular dynamics in living cell nuclei revealed by fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. Histochem. Cell Biol. 115, 13–21 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ribeiro-Silva, C. et al. DNA damage sensitivity of SWI/SNF-deficient cells depends on TFIIH subunit p62/GTF2H1. Nat. Commun. 9, 4067 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central ADS Google Scholar
Linkert, M. et al. Metadata matters: Access to image data in the real world. J. Cell Biol. 189, 777–782 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gert van Cappellen and Gert-Jan Kremers of the Erasmus MC Optical Imaging Center for microscope support, and Isabel Sierra of the Hubrecht Institute for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ALWOP.494 to HL; 711.018.007 to HL; VI.C.182.025 to JAM), Erasmus MC (HDMA Grant to WV/HL), Worldwide Cancer Research (15–1274 to WV/HL), the Dutch Cancer Society (KWF 10506 to WV/JAM/HL), the European Research Council (advanced grant 340988-ERC-ID to WV), and the Oncode Institute (to WV/RK/JAM), which is partly financed by the Dutch Cancer Society. We thank the Josephine Nefkens Cancer Program for infrastructure support.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Alba Muniesa-Vargas, Carlota Davó-Martínez, Cristina Ribeiro-Silva.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Alba Muniesa-Vargas, Carlota Davó-Martínez, Cristina Ribeiro-Silva, Melanie van der Woude, Karen L. Thijssen, David Häckes, Ülkem U. Kaynak, Arjan F. Theil, Wim Vermeulen & Hannes Lans
Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Oncode Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Ben Haspels, Roland Kanaar, Jurgen A. Marteijn & Maayke M. P. Kuijten

Authors

Alba Muniesa-Vargas
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Carlota Davó-Martínez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Cristina Ribeiro-Silva
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Melanie van der Woude
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Karen L. Thijssen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ben Haspels
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
David Häckes
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ülkem U. Kaynak
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Roland Kanaar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jurgen A. Marteijn
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Arjan F. Theil
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Maayke M. P. Kuijten
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wim Vermeulen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hannes Lans
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.M.V., C.D.M., C.R.S., D.H. and U.U.K. performed live cell imaging and other human cell line experiments. C.D.M., M.W. and K.L.T. generated C. elegans strains, performed dye filling, survival and other C. elegans experiments. K.L.T. generated DNA constructs. A.M.V., B.H. and M.M.P.K. performed senescence experiments. A.M.V., C.R.S. and A.F.T. generated cell lines. A.M.V., C.D.M., C.R.S., R.K., J.A.M., W.V. and H.L. conceptualized ideas, designed experiments and analyzed data. A.M.V., C.D.M. and M.M.P.K. generated figures. A.M.V., C.R.S. and H.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Lans.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Anton Gartner and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muniesa-Vargas, A., Davó-Martínez, C., Ribeiro-Silva, C. et al. Persistent TFIIH binding to non-excised DNA damage causes cell and developmental failure. Nat Commun 15, 3490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47935-9

Download citation

Received: 22 April 2023
Accepted: 12 April 2024
Published: 25 April 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47935-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.